
git-svn-id: svn://svn.h5l.se/heimdal/trunk/heimdal@16075 ec53bebd-3082-4978-b11e-865c3cabbd6b
1178 lines
32 KiB
Plaintext
1178 lines
32 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
|
||
Internet Engineering Task Force K. Jaganathan
|
||
Internet-Draft L. Zhu
|
||
Expires: January 19, 2006 J. Brezak
|
||
Microsoft Corporation
|
||
July 18, 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type
|
||
draft-jaganathan-rc4-hmac-01.txt
|
||
|
||
Status of this Memo
|
||
|
||
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
|
||
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
|
||
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
|
||
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
|
||
|
||
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
|
||
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
|
||
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
|
||
Drafts.
|
||
|
||
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
|
||
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
|
||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
|
||
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
|
||
|
||
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
|
||
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
|
||
|
||
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
|
||
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
|
||
|
||
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 19, 2006.
|
||
|
||
Copyright Notice
|
||
|
||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
|
||
|
||
Abstract
|
||
|
||
The Microsoft Windows 2000 implementation of Kerberos introduces a
|
||
new encryption type based on the RC4 encryption algorithm and using
|
||
an MD5 HMAC for checksum. This is offered as an alternative to using
|
||
the existing DES based encryption types.
|
||
|
||
The RC4-HMAC encryption types are used to ease upgrade of existing
|
||
Windows NT environments, provide strong crypto (128-bit key lengths),
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 1]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
and provide exportable (meet United States government export
|
||
restriction requirements) encryption. This document describes the
|
||
implementation of those encryption types
|
||
|
||
Table of Contents
|
||
|
||
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
|
||
2. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
|
||
3. Key Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
|
||
4. Basic Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
|
||
5. Checksum Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
|
||
6. Encryption Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
|
||
7. Key Strength Negotiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
|
||
8. GSSAPI Kerberos V5 Mechanism Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
|
||
8.1 Mechanism Specific Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
|
||
8.2 GSSAPI MIC Semantics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
|
||
8.3 GSSAPI WRAP Semantics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
|
||
9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
|
||
10. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
|
||
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
|
||
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . 21
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 2]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
1. Introduction
|
||
|
||
The Microsoft Windows 2000 implementation of Kerberos contains new
|
||
encryption and checksum types for two reasons: for export reasons
|
||
early in the development process, 56 bit DES encryption could not be
|
||
exported, and because upon upgrade from Windows NT 4.0 to Windows
|
||
2000, accounts will not have the appropriate DES keying material to
|
||
do the standard DES encryption. Furthermore, 3DES is not available
|
||
for export, and there was a desire to use a single flavor of
|
||
encryption in the product for both US and international products.
|
||
|
||
As a result, there are two new encryption types and one new checksum
|
||
type introduced in Microsoft Windows 2000.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 3]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
2. Conventions Used in This Document
|
||
|
||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
|
||
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
|
||
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 4]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
3. Key Generation
|
||
|
||
On upgrade from existing Windows NT domains, the user accounts would
|
||
not have a DES based key available to enable the use of DES base
|
||
encryption types specified in RFC 4120. The key used for RC4-HMAC is
|
||
the same as the existing Windows NT key (NT Password Hash) for
|
||
compatibility reasons. Once the account password is changed, the DES
|
||
based keys are created and maintained. Once the DES keys are
|
||
available DES based encryption types can be used with Kerberos.
|
||
|
||
The RC4-HMAC String to key function is defined as follow:
|
||
|
||
String2Key(password)
|
||
|
||
K = MD4(UNICODE(password))
|
||
|
||
The RC4-HMAC keys are generated by using the Windows UNICODE version
|
||
of the password. Each Windows UNICODE character is encoded in
|
||
little-endian format of 2 octets each. Then performing an MD4
|
||
[RFC1320] hash operation on just the UNICODE characters of the
|
||
password (not including the terminating zero octets).
|
||
|
||
For an account with a password of "foo", this String2Key("foo") will
|
||
return:
|
||
|
||
0xac, 0x8e, 0x65, 0x7f, 0x83, 0xdf, 0x82, 0xbe,
|
||
0xea, 0x5d, 0x43, 0xbd, 0xaf, 0x78, 0x00, 0xcc
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 5]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
4. Basic Operations
|
||
|
||
The MD5 HMAC function is defined in [RFC2104]. It is used in this
|
||
encryption type for checksum operations. Refer to[RFC2104]for
|
||
details on its operation. In this document this function is referred
|
||
to as HMAC(Key, Data) returning the checksum using the specified key
|
||
on the data.
|
||
|
||
The basic MD5 hash operation is used in this encryption type and
|
||
defined in [RFC1321]. In this document this function is referred to
|
||
as MD5(Data) returning the checksum of the data.
|
||
|
||
RC4 is a stream cipher licensed by RSA Data Security . In this
|
||
document the function is referred to as RC4(Key, Data) returning the
|
||
encrypted data using the specified key on the data.
|
||
|
||
These encryption types use key derivation. With each message, the
|
||
message type (T) is used as a component of the keying material. This
|
||
table summarizes the different key derivation values used in the
|
||
various operations. Note that these differ from the key derivations
|
||
used in other Kerberos encryption types. T = the message type,
|
||
encoded as a little-endian four byte integer.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 6]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
1. AS-REQ PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP padata timestamp, encrypted with
|
||
the client key (T=1)
|
||
2. AS-REP Ticket and TGS-REP Ticket (includes TGS session key
|
||
or application session key), encrypted with the service key
|
||
(T=2)
|
||
3. AS-REP encrypted part (includes TGS session key or
|
||
application session key), encrypted with the client key (T=8)
|
||
4. TGS-REQ KDC-REQ-BODY AuthorizationData, encrypted with the
|
||
TGS session key (T=4)
|
||
5. TGS-REQ KDC-REQ-BODY AuthorizationData, encrypted with the
|
||
TGS authenticator subkey (T=5)
|
||
6. TGS-REQ PA-TGS-REQ padata AP-REQ Authenticator cksum,
|
||
keyed with the TGS session key (T=6)
|
||
7. TGS-REQ PA-TGS-REQ padata AP-REQ Authenticator (includes
|
||
TGS authenticator subkey), encrypted with the TGS session key
|
||
T=7)
|
||
8. TGS-REP encrypted part (includes application session key),
|
||
encrypted with the TGS session key (T=8)
|
||
9. TGS-REP encrypted part (includes application session key),
|
||
encrypted with the TGS authenticator subkey (T=8)
|
||
10. AP-REQ Authenticator cksum, keyed with the application
|
||
session key (T=10)
|
||
11. AP-REQ Authenticator (includes application authenticator
|
||
subkey), encrypted with the application session key (T=11)
|
||
12. AP-REP encrypted part (includes application session
|
||
subkey), encrypted with the application session key (T=12)
|
||
13. KRB-PRIV encrypted part, encrypted with a key chosen by
|
||
the application. Also for data encrypted with GSS Wrap (T=13)
|
||
14. KRB-CRED encrypted part, encrypted with a key chosen by
|
||
the application (T=14)
|
||
15. KRB-SAFE cksum, keyed with a key chosen by the
|
||
application. Also for data signed in GSS MIC (T=15)
|
||
|
||
Relative to RFC-4121 key uses:
|
||
|
||
T = 0 in the generation of sequence number for the MIC token
|
||
T = 0 in the generation of sequence number for the WRAP token
|
||
T = 0 in the generation of encrypted data for the WRAPPED token
|
||
|
||
All strings in this document are ASCII unless otherwise specified.
|
||
The lengths of ASCII encoded character strings include the trailing
|
||
terminator character (0). The concat(a,b,c,...) function will return
|
||
the logical concatenation (left to right) of the values of the
|
||
arguments. The nonce(n) function returns a pseudo-random number of
|
||
"n" octets.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 7]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
5. Checksum Types
|
||
|
||
There is one checksum type used in this encryption type. The
|
||
Kerberos constant for this type is:
|
||
|
||
#define KERB_CHECKSUM_HMAC_MD5 (-138)
|
||
|
||
The function is defined as follows:
|
||
|
||
K - is the Key
|
||
T - the message type, encoded as a little-endian four byte integer
|
||
|
||
CHKSUM(K, T, data)
|
||
|
||
Ksign = HMAC(K, "signaturekey") //includes zero octet at end
|
||
tmp = MD5(concat(T, data))
|
||
CHKSUM = HMAC(Ksign, tmp)
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 8]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
6. Encryption Types
|
||
|
||
There are two encryption types used in these encryption types. The
|
||
Kerberos constants for these types are:
|
||
|
||
#define KERB_ETYPE_RC4_HMAC 23
|
||
#define KERB_ETYPE_RC4_HMAC_EXP 24
|
||
|
||
The basic encryption function is defined as follow:
|
||
|
||
T = the message type, encoded as a little-endian four byte integer.
|
||
|
||
OCTET L40[14] = "fortybits";
|
||
OCTET SK = "signaturekey";
|
||
|
||
The header field on the encrypted data in KDC messages is:
|
||
|
||
typedef struct _RC4_MDx_HEADER {
|
||
OCTET Checksum[16];
|
||
OCTET Confounder[8];
|
||
} RC4_MDx_HEADER, *PRC4_MDx_HEADER;
|
||
|
||
|
||
ENCRYPT (K, export, T, data)
|
||
{
|
||
struct EDATA {
|
||
struct HEADER {
|
||
OCTET Checksum[16];
|
||
OCTET Confounder[8];
|
||
} Header;
|
||
OCTET Data[0];
|
||
} edata;
|
||
|
||
if (export){
|
||
*((DWORD *)(L40+10)) = T;
|
||
HMAC (K, L40, 10 + 4, K1);
|
||
}
|
||
else
|
||
{
|
||
HMAC (K, "&"T, 4, K1);
|
||
}
|
||
memcpy (K2, K1, 16);
|
||
if (export) memset (K1+7, 0xAB, 9);
|
||
|
||
nonce (edata.Confounder, 8);
|
||
memcpy (edata.Data, data);
|
||
|
||
edata.Checksum = HMAC (K2, edata);
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 9]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
K3 = HMAC (K1, edata.Checksum);
|
||
|
||
RC4 (K3, edata.Confounder);
|
||
RC4 (K3, data.Data);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
DECRYPT (K, export, T, edata)
|
||
{
|
||
// edata looks like
|
||
struct EDATA {
|
||
struct HEADER {
|
||
OCTET Checksum[16];
|
||
OCTET Confounder[8];
|
||
} Header;
|
||
OCTET Data[0];
|
||
} edata;
|
||
|
||
if (export){
|
||
*((DWORD *)(L40+10)) = T;
|
||
HMAC (K, L40, 14, K1);
|
||
}
|
||
else
|
||
{
|
||
HMAC (K, "&"T, 4, K1);
|
||
}
|
||
memcpy (K2, K1, 16);
|
||
if (export) memset (K1+7, 0xAB, 9);
|
||
|
||
K3 = HMAC (K1, edata.Checksum);
|
||
|
||
RC4 (K3, edata.Confounder);
|
||
RC4 (K3, edata.Data);
|
||
|
||
|
||
// verify generated and received checksums
|
||
checksum = HMAC (K2, concat(edata.Confounder, edata.Data));
|
||
if (checksum != edata.Checksum)
|
||
printf("CHECKSUM ERROR !!!!!!\n");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
The KDC message is encrypted using the ENCRYPT function not including
|
||
the Checksum in the RC4_MDx_HEADER.
|
||
|
||
The character constant "fortybits" evolved from the time when a 40-
|
||
bit key length was all that was exportable from the United States.
|
||
It is now used to recognize that the key length is of "exportable"
|
||
length. In this description, the key size is actually 56-bits.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 10]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
7. Key Strength Negotiation
|
||
|
||
TA Kerberos client and server can negotiate over key length if they
|
||
are using mutual authentication. If the client is unable to perform
|
||
full strength encryption, it may propose a key in the "subkey" field
|
||
of the authenticator, using a weaker encryption type. The server
|
||
must then either return the same key or suggest its own key in the
|
||
subkey field of the AP reply message. The key used to encrypt data
|
||
is derived from the key returned by the server. If the client is
|
||
able to perform strong encryption but the server is not, it may
|
||
propose a subkey in the AP reply without first being sent a subkey in
|
||
the authenticator.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 11]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
8. GSSAPI Kerberos V5 Mechanism Type
|
||
|
||
8.1 Mechanism Specific Changes
|
||
|
||
The GSSAPI per-message tokens also require new checksum and
|
||
encryption types. The GSS-API per-message tokens are adapted to
|
||
support these new encryption types . See [RFC4121] .
|
||
|
||
The only support quality of protection is:
|
||
|
||
#define GSS_KRB5_INTEG_C_QOP_DEFAULT 0x0
|
||
|
||
When using this RC4 based encryption type, the sequence number is
|
||
always sent in big-endian rather than little-endian order.
|
||
|
||
The Windows 2000 implementation also defines new GSSAPI flags in the
|
||
initial token passed when initializing a security context. These
|
||
flags are passed in the checksum field of the authenticator. See
|
||
[RFC4121] .
|
||
|
||
GSS_C_DCE_STYLE - This flag was added for use with Microsoft's
|
||
implementation of DCE RPC, which initially expected three legs of
|
||
authentication. Setting this flag causes an extra AP reply to be
|
||
sent from the client back to the server after receiving the serverAEs
|
||
AP reply. In addition, the context negotiation tokens do not have
|
||
GSSAPI per message tokens - they are raw AP messages that do not
|
||
include object identifiers.
|
||
|
||
#define GSS_C_DCE_STYLE 0x1000
|
||
|
||
GSS_C_IDENTIFY_FLAG - This flag allows the client to indicate to the
|
||
server that it should only allow the server application to identify
|
||
the client by name and ID, but not to impersonate the client.
|
||
|
||
#define GSS_C_IDENTIFY_FLAG 0x2000
|
||
|
||
GSS_C_EXTENDED_ERROR_FLAG - Setting this flag indicates that the
|
||
client wants to be informed of extended error information. In
|
||
particular, Windows 2000 status codes may be returned in the data
|
||
field of a Kerberos error message. This allows the client to
|
||
understand a server failure more precisely. In addition, the server
|
||
may return errors to the client that are normally handled at the
|
||
application layer in the server, in order to let the client try to
|
||
recover. After receiving an error message, the client may attempt to
|
||
resubmit an AP request.
|
||
|
||
#define GSS_C_EXTENDED_ERROR_FLAG 0x4000
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 12]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
These flags are only used if a client is aware of these conventions
|
||
when using the SSPI on the Windows platform; they are not generally
|
||
used by default.
|
||
|
||
When NetBIOS addresses are used in the GSSAPI, they are identified by
|
||
the GSS_C_AF_NETBIOS value. This value is defined as:
|
||
|
||
#define GSS_C_AF_NETBIOS 0x14
|
||
|
||
NetBios addresses are 16-octet addresses typically composed of 1 to
|
||
15 characters, trailing blank (ASCII char 20) filled, with a 16-th
|
||
octet of 0x0.
|
||
|
||
8.2 GSSAPI MIC Semantics
|
||
|
||
The GSSAPI checksum type and algorithm is defined in Section 5. Only
|
||
the first 8 octets of the checksum are used. The resulting checksum
|
||
is stored in the SGN_CKSUM field . See [RFC4121] for GSS_GetMIC()
|
||
and GSS_Wrap(conf_flag=FALSE).
|
||
|
||
The GSS_GetMIC token has the following format:
|
||
|
||
Byte no Name Description
|
||
0..1 TOK_ID Identification field.
|
||
Tokens emitted by GSS_GetMIC() contain
|
||
the hex value 01 01 in this field.
|
||
2..3 SGN_ALG Integrity algorithm indicator.
|
||
11 00 - HMAC
|
||
4..7 Filler Contains ff ff ff ff
|
||
8..15 SND_SEQ Sequence number field.
|
||
6..23 SGN_CKSUM Checksum of "to-be-signed data",
|
||
calculated according to algorithm
|
||
specified in SGN_ALG field.
|
||
|
||
The MIC mechanism used for GSS MIC based messages is as follow:
|
||
|
||
GetMIC(Kss, direction, export, seq_num, data)
|
||
{
|
||
struct Token {
|
||
struct Header {
|
||
OCTET TOK_ID[2];
|
||
OCTET SGN_ALG[2];
|
||
OCTET Filler[4];
|
||
};
|
||
OCTET SND_SEQ[8];
|
||
OCTET SGN_CKSUM[8];
|
||
} Token;
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 13]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
Token.TOK_ID = 01 01;
|
||
Token.SGN_SLG = 11 00;
|
||
Token.Filler = ff ff ff ff;
|
||
|
||
// Create the sequence number
|
||
|
||
if (direction == sender_is_initiator)
|
||
{
|
||
memset(Token.SEND_SEQ+4, 0xff, 4)
|
||
}
|
||
else if (direction == sender_is_acceptor)
|
||
{
|
||
memset(Token.SEND_SEQ+4, 0, 4)
|
||
}
|
||
Token.SEND_SEQ[0] = (seq_num "&" 0xff000000) >> 24;
|
||
Token.SEND_SEQ[1] = (seq_num "&" 0x00ff0000) >> 16;
|
||
Token.SEND_SEQ[2] = (seq_num "&" 0x0000ff00) >> 8;
|
||
Token.SEND_SEQ[3] = (seq_num "&" 0x000000ff);
|
||
|
||
// Derive signing key from session key
|
||
|
||
Ksign = HMAC(Kss, "signaturekey");
|
||
// length includes terminating null
|
||
|
||
// Generate checksum of message - SGN_CKSUM
|
||
// Key derivation salt = 15
|
||
|
||
Sgn_Cksum = MD5((int32)15, Token.Header, data);
|
||
|
||
// Save first 8 octets of HMAC Sgn_Cksum
|
||
|
||
Sgn_Cksum = HMAC(Ksign, Sgn_Cksum);
|
||
memcpy(Token.SGN_CKSUM, Sgn_Cksum, 8);
|
||
|
||
// Encrypt the sequence number
|
||
|
||
// Derive encryption key for the sequence number
|
||
// Key derivation salt = 0
|
||
|
||
if (exportable)
|
||
{
|
||
Kseq = HMAC(Kss, "fortybits", (int32)0);
|
||
// len includes terminating null
|
||
memset(Kseq+7, 0xab, 7)
|
||
}
|
||
else
|
||
{
|
||
Kseq = HMAC(Kss, (int32)0);
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 14]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
}
|
||
Kseq = HMAC(Kseq, Token.SGN_CKSUM);
|
||
|
||
// Encrypt the sequence number
|
||
|
||
RC4(Kseq, Token.SND_SEQ);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
8.3 GSSAPI WRAP Semantics
|
||
|
||
There are two encryption keys for GSSAPI message tokens, one that is
|
||
128 bits in strength, and one that is 56 bits in strength as defined
|
||
in Section 6.
|
||
|
||
All padding is rounded up to 1 byte. One byte is needed to say that
|
||
there is 1 byte of padding. The DES based mechanism type uses 8 byte
|
||
padding. See [RFC4121] .
|
||
|
||
The RC4-HMAC GSS_Wrap() token has the following format:
|
||
|
||
|
||
Byte no Name Description
|
||
0..1 TOK_ID Identification field.
|
||
Tokens emitted by GSS_Wrap() contain
|
||
the hex value 02 01 in this field.
|
||
2..3 SGN_ALG Checksum algorithm indicator.
|
||
11 00 - HMAC
|
||
4..5 SEAL_ALG ff ff - none
|
||
00 00 - DES-CBC
|
||
10 00 - RC4
|
||
6..7 Filler Contains ff ff
|
||
8..15 SND_SEQ Encrypted sequence number field.
|
||
16..23 SGN_CKSUM Checksum of plaintext padded data,
|
||
calculated according to algorithm
|
||
specified in SGN_ALG field.
|
||
24..31 Confounder Random confounder
|
||
32..last Data encrypted or plaintext padded data
|
||
|
||
The encryption mechanism used for GSS wrap based messages is as
|
||
follow:
|
||
|
||
|
||
WRAP(Kss, encrypt, direction, export, seq_num, data)
|
||
{
|
||
struct Token { // 32 octets
|
||
struct Header {
|
||
OCTET TOK_ID[2];
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 15]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
OCTET SGN_ALG[2];
|
||
OCTET SEAL_ALG[2];
|
||
OCTET Filler[2];
|
||
};
|
||
OCTET SND_SEQ[8];
|
||
OCTET SGN_CKSUM[8];
|
||
OCTET Confounder[8];
|
||
} Token;
|
||
|
||
|
||
Token.TOK_ID = 02 01;
|
||
Token.SGN_SLG = 11 00;
|
||
Token.SEAL_ALG = (no_encrypt)? ff ff : 10 00;
|
||
Token.Filler = ff ff;
|
||
|
||
// Create the sequence number
|
||
|
||
if (direction == sender_is_initiator)
|
||
{
|
||
memset("&"Token.SEND_SEQ[4], 0xff, 4)
|
||
}
|
||
else if (direction == sender_is_acceptor)
|
||
{
|
||
memset("&"Token.SEND_SEQ[4], 0, 4)
|
||
}
|
||
Token.SEND_SEQ[0] = (seq_num "&" 0xff000000) >> 24;
|
||
Token.SEND_SEQ[1] = (seq_num "&" 0x00ff0000) >> 16;
|
||
Token.SEND_SEQ[2] = (seq_num "&" 0x0000ff00) >> 8;
|
||
Token.SEND_SEQ[3] = (seq_num "&" 0x000000ff);
|
||
|
||
// Generate random confounder
|
||
|
||
nonce("&"Token.Confounder, 8);
|
||
|
||
// Derive signing key from session key
|
||
|
||
Ksign = HMAC(Kss, "signaturekey");
|
||
|
||
// Generate checksum of message -
|
||
// SGN_CKSUM + Token.Confounder
|
||
// Key derivation salt = 15
|
||
|
||
Sgn_Cksum = MD5((int32)15, Token.Header,
|
||
Token.Confounder);
|
||
|
||
// Derive encryption key for data
|
||
// Key derivation salt = 0
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 16]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
for (i = 0; i "<" 16; i++) Klocal[i] = Kss[i] ^ 0xF0;
|
||
// XOR
|
||
if (exportable)
|
||
{
|
||
Kcrypt = HMAC(Klocal, "fortybits", (int32)0);
|
||
// len includes terminating null
|
||
memset(Kcrypt+7, 0xab, 7);
|
||
}
|
||
else
|
||
{
|
||
Kcrypt = HMAC(Klocal, (int32)0);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// new encryption key salted with seq
|
||
|
||
Kcrypt = HMAC(Kcrypt, (int32)seq);
|
||
|
||
// Encrypt confounder (if encrypting)
|
||
|
||
if (encrypt)
|
||
RC4(Kcrypt, Token.Confounder);
|
||
|
||
// Sum the data buffer
|
||
|
||
Sgn_Cksum += MD5(data); // Append to checksum
|
||
|
||
// Encrypt the data (if encrypting)
|
||
|
||
if (encrypt)
|
||
RC4(Kcrypt, data);
|
||
|
||
// Save first 8 octets of HMAC Sgn_Cksum
|
||
|
||
Sgn_Cksum = HMAC(Ksign, Sgn_Cksum);
|
||
memcpy(Token.SGN_CKSUM, Sgn_Cksum, 8);
|
||
|
||
// Derive encryption key for the sequence number
|
||
// Key derivation salt = 0
|
||
|
||
if (exportable)
|
||
{
|
||
Kseq = HMAC(Kss, "fortybits", (int32)0);
|
||
// len includes terminating null
|
||
memset(Kseq+7, 0xab, 7)
|
||
}
|
||
else
|
||
{
|
||
Kseq = HMAC(Kss, (int32)0);
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 17]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
}
|
||
Kseq = HMAC(Kseq, Token.SGN_CKSUM);
|
||
|
||
// Encrypt the sequence number
|
||
|
||
RC4(Kseq, Token.SND_SEQ);
|
||
|
||
// Encrypted message = Token + Data
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
The character constant "fortybits" evolved from the time when a 40-
|
||
bit key length was all that was exportable from the United States.
|
||
It is now used to recognize that the key length is of "exportable"
|
||
length. In this description, the key size is actually 56-bits.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 18]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
9. Security Considerations
|
||
|
||
Care must be taken in implementing this encryption type because it
|
||
uses a stream cipher. If a different IV isn't used in each direction
|
||
when using a session key, the encryption is weak. By using the
|
||
sequence number as an IV, this is avoided. The Windows
|
||
implementation of Kerberos uses a minimum RC4 key strength of 128
|
||
bits. A discussion of the security considerations when using HMACs
|
||
is present in [RFC2104] .
|
||
|
||
10. Normative References
|
||
|
||
[RFC1320] Rivest, R., "The MD4 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC 1320,
|
||
April 1992.
|
||
|
||
[RFC1321] Rivest, R., "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC 1321,
|
||
April 1992.
|
||
|
||
[RFC2104] Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, "HMAC: Keyed-
|
||
Hashing for Message Authentication", RFC 2104,
|
||
February 1997.
|
||
|
||
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
|
||
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
|
||
|
||
[RFC4120] Neuman, C., Yu, T., Hartman, S., and K. Raeburn, "The
|
||
Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)", RFC 4120,
|
||
July 2005.
|
||
|
||
[RFC4121] Zhu, L., Jaganathan, K., and S. Hartman, "The Kerberos
|
||
Version 5 Generic Security Service Application Program
|
||
Interface (GSS-API) Mechanism: Version 2", RFC 4121,
|
||
July 2005.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Authors' Addresses
|
||
|
||
Karthik Jaganathan
|
||
Microsoft Corporation
|
||
One Microsoft Way
|
||
Redmond, WA 98052
|
||
US
|
||
|
||
Email: karthikj@microsoft.com
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 19]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
Larry Zhu
|
||
Microsoft Corporation
|
||
One Microsoft Way
|
||
Redmond, WA 98052
|
||
US
|
||
|
||
Email: lzhu@microsoft.com
|
||
|
||
|
||
John Brezak
|
||
Microsoft Corporation
|
||
One Microsoft Way
|
||
Redmond, WA 98052
|
||
US
|
||
|
||
Email: jbrezak@microsoft.com
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 20]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft The RC4-HMAC Kerberos encryption type July 2005
|
||
|
||
|
||
Intellectual Property Statement
|
||
|
||
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
|
||
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
|
||
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
|
||
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
|
||
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
|
||
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
|
||
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
|
||
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
|
||
|
||
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
|
||
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
|
||
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
|
||
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
|
||
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
|
||
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
|
||
|
||
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
|
||
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
|
||
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
|
||
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
|
||
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Disclaimer of Validity
|
||
|
||
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
|
||
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
|
||
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
|
||
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
|
||
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
|
||
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
|
||
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Copyright Statement
|
||
|
||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject
|
||
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
|
||
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Acknowledgment
|
||
|
||
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
|
||
Internet Society.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Jaganathan, et al. Expires January 19, 2006 [Page 21]
|
||
|
||
|