
git-svn-id: svn://svn.h5l.se/heimdal/trunk/heimdal@14346 ec53bebd-3082-4978-b11e-865c3cabbd6b
6867 lines
208 KiB
Plaintext
6867 lines
208 KiB
Plaintext
INTERNET-DRAFT Tom Yu
|
|
draft-yu-krb-wg-kerberos-extensions-02.txt MIT
|
|
Expires: 25 April 2005 25 October 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Kerberos Network Authentication Service (Version 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status of This Memo
|
|
|
|
|
|
By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable
|
|
patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed,
|
|
or will be disclosed, and any of which I become aware will be
|
|
disclosed, in accordance with RFC 3668.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
|
|
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
|
|
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
|
|
Drafts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
|
|
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
|
|
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
|
|
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
|
|
|
|
|
|
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
|
|
|
|
|
|
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright Notice
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document describes version 5 of the Kerberos network
|
|
authentication protocol. It describes a framework to allow for
|
|
extensions to be made to the protocol without creating
|
|
interoperability problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Words for Requirements
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
|
|
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", and "MAY" in this document are
|
|
to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 1]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status of This Memo .............................................. 1
|
|
Copyright Notice ................................................. 1
|
|
Abstract ......................................................... 1
|
|
Key Words for Requirements ....................................... 1
|
|
Table of Contents ................................................ 2
|
|
1. Introduction ................................................. 5
|
|
1.1. Kerberos Protocol Overview ................................. 5
|
|
1.2. Document Organization ...................................... 6
|
|
2. Compatibility Considerations ................................. 6
|
|
2.1. Extensibility .............................................. 7
|
|
2.2. Compatibility with RFC 1510 ................................ 7
|
|
2.3. Backwards Compatibility .................................... 7
|
|
2.4. 1.4.2. Sending Extensible Messages ......................... 8
|
|
2.5. Criticality ................................................ 8
|
|
2.6. Authenticating Cleartext Portions of Messages .............. 9
|
|
2.7. Capability Negotiation ..................................... 10
|
|
3. Use of ASN.1 in Kerberos ..................................... 10
|
|
3.1. Module Header .............................................. 11
|
|
3.2. Top-Level Type ............................................. 11
|
|
3.3. Previously Unused ASN.1 Notation (informative) ............. 12
|
|
3.3.1. Parameterized Types ...................................... 12
|
|
3.3.2. COMPONENTS OF Notation ................................... 12
|
|
3.3.3. Constraints .............................................. 12
|
|
3.4. New Types .................................................. 13
|
|
4. Basic Types .................................................. 14
|
|
4.1. Constrained Integer Types .................................. 14
|
|
4.2. KerberosTime ............................................... 15
|
|
4.3. KerberosString ............................................. 15
|
|
4.4. Language Tags .............................................. 16
|
|
4.5. KerberosFlags .............................................. 16
|
|
4.6. Typed Holes ................................................ 16
|
|
4.7. HostAddress and HostAddresses .............................. 17
|
|
4.7.1. Internet (IPv4) Addresses ................................ 17
|
|
4.7.2. Internet (IPv6) Addresses ................................ 17
|
|
4.7.3. DECnet Phase IV addresses ................................ 18
|
|
4.7.4. Netbios addresses ........................................ 18
|
|
4.7.5. Directional Addresses .................................... 18
|
|
5. Principals ................................................... 19
|
|
5.1. Name Types ................................................. 19
|
|
5.2. Principal Type Definition .................................. 19
|
|
5.3. Principal Name Reuse ....................................... 20
|
|
5.4. Realm Names ................................................ 20
|
|
5.5. Printable Representations of Principal Names ............... 21
|
|
5.6. Ticket-Granting Service Principal .......................... 21
|
|
5.6.1. Cross-Realm TGS Principals ............................... 21
|
|
6. Types Relating to Encryption ................................. 21
|
|
6.1. Assigned Numbers for Encryption ............................ 22
|
|
6.1.1. EType .................................................... 22
|
|
6.1.2. Key Usages ............................................... 22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 2]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2. Which Key to Use ........................................... 23
|
|
6.3. EncryptionKey .............................................. 24
|
|
6.4. EncryptedData .............................................. 24
|
|
6.5. Checksums .................................................. 25
|
|
6.5.1. ChecksumOf ............................................... 26
|
|
6.5.2. Signed ................................................... 27
|
|
7. Tickets ...................................................... 27
|
|
7.1. Timestamps ................................................. 28
|
|
7.2. Ticket Flags ............................................... 28
|
|
7.2.1. Flags Relating to Initial Ticket Acquisition ............. 29
|
|
7.2.2. Invalid Tickets .......................................... 29
|
|
7.2.3. OK as Delegate ........................................... 30
|
|
7.2.4. Renewable Tickets ........................................ 30
|
|
7.2.5. Postdated Tickets ........................................ 31
|
|
7.2.6. Proxiable and Proxy Tickets .............................. 32
|
|
7.2.7. Forwarded and Forwardable Tickets ........................ 33
|
|
7.3. Transited Realms ........................................... 34
|
|
7.4. Authorization Data ......................................... 34
|
|
7.4.1. AD-IF-RELEVANT ........................................... 35
|
|
7.4.2. AD-KDCIssued ............................................. 35
|
|
7.4.3. AD-AND-OR ................................................ 37
|
|
7.4.4. AD-MANDATORY-FOR-KDC ..................................... 37
|
|
7.5. Encrypted Part of Ticket ................................... 37
|
|
7.6. Cleartext Part of Ticket ................................... 38
|
|
8. Credential Acquisition ....................................... 40
|
|
8.1. KDC-REQ .................................................... 40
|
|
8.2. PA-DATA .................................................... 46
|
|
8.3. KDC-REQ Processing ......................................... 46
|
|
8.3.1. Handling Replays ......................................... 46
|
|
8.3.2. Request Validation ....................................... 47
|
|
8.3.2.1. AS-REQ Authentication .................................. 47
|
|
8.3.2.2. TGS-REQ Authentication ................................. 47
|
|
8.3.2.3. Principal Validation ................................... 47
|
|
8.3.2.4. Checking For Revoked or Invalid Tickets ................ 48
|
|
8.3.3. Timestamp Handling ....................................... 48
|
|
8.3.3.1. AS-REQ Timestamp Processing ............................ 49
|
|
8.3.3.2. TGS-REQ Timestamp Processing ........................... 49
|
|
8.3.4. Handling Transited Realms ................................ 50
|
|
8.3.5. Address Processing ....................................... 50
|
|
8.3.6. Ticket Flag Processing ................................... 51
|
|
8.3.7. Key Selection ............................................ 52
|
|
8.3.7.1. Reply Key and Session Key Selection .................... 52
|
|
8.3.7.2. Ticket Key Selection ................................... 52
|
|
8.4. KDC-REP .................................................... 52
|
|
8.5. Reply Validation ........................................... 55
|
|
8.6. IP Transports .............................................. 55
|
|
8.6.1. UDP/IP transport ......................................... 55
|
|
8.6.2. TCP/IP transport ......................................... 56
|
|
8.6.3. KDC Discovery on IP Networks ............................. 57
|
|
8.6.3.1. DNS vs. Kerberos - Case Sensitivity of Realm Names ..... 57
|
|
8.6.3.2. DNS SRV records for KDC location ....................... 58
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 3]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6.3.3. KDC Discovery for Domain Style Realm Names on IP
|
|
Networks ............................................ 58
|
|
9. Errors ....................................................... 58
|
|
10. Session Key Exchange ........................................ 61
|
|
10.1. AP-REQ .................................................... 61
|
|
10.2. AP-REP .................................................... 63
|
|
11. Session Key Use ............................................. 65
|
|
11.1. KRB-SAFE .................................................. 65
|
|
11.2. KRB-PRIV .................................................. 65
|
|
11.3. KRB-CRED .................................................. 66
|
|
12. Security Considerations ..................................... 67
|
|
12.1. Time Synchronization ...................................... 67
|
|
12.2. Replays ................................................... 67
|
|
12.3. Principal Name Reuse ...................................... 67
|
|
12.4. Password Guessing ......................................... 67
|
|
12.5. Forward Secrecy ........................................... 67
|
|
12.6. Authorization ............................................. 68
|
|
12.7. Login Authentication ...................................... 68
|
|
13. IANA Considerations ......................................... 68
|
|
14. Acknowledgments ............................................. 69
|
|
Appendices ....................................................... 69
|
|
A. ASN.1 Module (Normative) ..................................... 69
|
|
B. Kerberos and Character Encodings (Informative) ...............103
|
|
C. Kerberos History (Informative) ...............................104
|
|
D. Notational Differences from [KCLAR] ..........................105
|
|
Normative References .............................................106
|
|
Informative References ...........................................106
|
|
Author's Address .................................................108
|
|
Full Copyright Statement .........................................108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 4]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Introduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Kerberos network authentication protocol is a trusted-third-party
|
|
protocol utilizing symmetric-key cryptography. It assumes that all
|
|
communications between parties in the protocol may be arbitrarily
|
|
tampered with or monitored, and that the security of the overall
|
|
system depends only on the effectiveness of the cryptographic
|
|
techniques and the secrecy of the cryptographic keys used. The
|
|
Kerberos protocol authenticates an application client's identity to
|
|
an application server, and likewise authenticates the application
|
|
server's identity to the application client. These assurances are
|
|
made possible by the client and the server sharing secrets with the
|
|
trusted third party: the Kerberos server, also known as the Key
|
|
Distribution Center (KDC). In addition, the protocol establishes an
|
|
ephemeral shared secret (the session key) between the client and the
|
|
server, allowing the protection of further communications between
|
|
them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Kerberos protocol, as originally specified, provides insufficient
|
|
means for extending the protocol in a backwards-compatible way. This
|
|
deficiency has caused problems for interoperability. This document
|
|
describes a framework which enables backwards-compatible extensions
|
|
to the Kerberos protocol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1. Kerberos Protocol Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerberos comprises three main sub-protocols: credentials acquisition,
|
|
session key exchange, and session key usage. A client acquires
|
|
credentials by asking the KDC for a credential for a service; the KDC
|
|
issues the credential, which contains a ticket and a session key.
|
|
The ticket, containing the client's identity, timestamps, expiration
|
|
time, and a session key, is a encrypted in a key known to the
|
|
application server. The KDC encrypts the credential using a key
|
|
known to the client, and transmits the credential to the client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two means of requesting credentials: the Authentication
|
|
Service (AS) exchange, and the Ticket-Granting Service (TGS)
|
|
exchange. In the typical AS exchange, a client uses a password-
|
|
derived key to decrypt the response. In the TGS exchange, the KDC
|
|
behaves as an application server; the client authenticates to the TGS
|
|
by using a Ticket-Granting Ticket (TGT). The client usually obtains
|
|
the TGT by using the AS exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session key exchange consists of the client transmitting the ticket
|
|
to the application server, accompanied by an authenticator. The
|
|
authenticator contains a timestamp and additional data encrypted
|
|
using the ticket's session key. The application server decrypts the
|
|
ticket, extracting the session key. The application server then uses
|
|
the session key to decrypt the authenticator. Upon successful
|
|
decryption of the authenticator, the application server knows that
|
|
the data in the authenticator were sent by the client named in the
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 5]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
associated ticket. Additionally, since authenticators expire more
|
|
quickly than tickets, the application server has some assurance that
|
|
the transaction is not a replay. The application server may send an
|
|
encrypted acknowledgment to the client, verifying its identity to the
|
|
client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once session key exchange has occurred, the client and server may use
|
|
the established session key to protect further traffic. This
|
|
protection may consist of protection of integrity only, or of
|
|
protection of confidentiality and integrity. Additional measures
|
|
exist for a client to securely forward credentials to a server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The entire scheme depends on loosely synchronized clocks.
|
|
Synchronization of the clock on the KDC with the application server
|
|
clock allows the application server to accurately determine whether a
|
|
credential is expired. Likewise, synchronization of the clock on the
|
|
client with the application server clock prevents replay attacks
|
|
utilizing the same credential. Careful design of the application
|
|
protocol may allow replay prevention without requiring client-server
|
|
clock synchronization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
After establishing a session key, application client and the
|
|
application server can exchange Kerberos protocol messages that use
|
|
the session key to protect the integrity or confidentiality of
|
|
communications between the client and the server. Additionally, the
|
|
client may forward credentials to the application server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The credentials acquisition protocol takes place over specific,
|
|
defined transports (UDP and TCP). Application protocols define which
|
|
transport to use for the session key establishment protocol and for
|
|
messages using the session key; the application may choose to perform
|
|
its own encapsulation of the Kerberos messages, for example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2. Document Organization
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remainder of this document begins by describing the general
|
|
frameworks for protocol extensibility, including whether to interpret
|
|
unknown extensions as critical. It then defines the protocol
|
|
messages and exchanges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The definition of the Kerberos protocol uses Abstract Syntax Notation
|
|
One (ASN.1) [X680], which specifies notation for describing the
|
|
abstract content of protocol messages. This document defines a
|
|
number of base types using ASN.1; these base types subsequently
|
|
appear in multiple types which define actual protocol messages.
|
|
Definitions of principal names and of tickets, which are central to
|
|
the protocol, also appear preceding the protocol message definitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 6]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Compatibility Considerations
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1. Extensibility
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the past, significant interoperability problems have resulted from
|
|
conflicting assumptions about how the Kerberos protocol can be
|
|
extended. As the deployed base of Kerberos grows, the ability to
|
|
extend the Kerberos protocol becomes more important. In order to
|
|
ensure that vendors and the IETF can extend the protocol while
|
|
maintaining backwards compatibility, this document outlines a
|
|
framework for extending Kerberos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerberos provides two general mechanisms for protocol extensibility.
|
|
Many protocol messages, including some defined in RFC 1510, contain
|
|
typed holes--sub-messages containing an octet string along with an
|
|
integer that identifies how to interpret the octet string. The
|
|
integer identifiers are registered centrally, but can be used both
|
|
for vendor extensions and for extensions standardized in the IETF.
|
|
This document adds typed holes to a number of messages which
|
|
previously lacked typed holes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many new messages defined in this document also contain ASN.1
|
|
extension markers. These markers allow future revisions of this
|
|
document to add additional elements to messages, for cases where
|
|
typed holes are inadequate for some reason. Because tag numbers and
|
|
position in a sequence need to be coordinated in order to maintain
|
|
interoperability, implementations MUST NOT include ASN.1 extensions
|
|
except when those extensions are specified by IETF standards-track
|
|
documents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2. Compatibility with RFC 1510
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementations of RFC 1510 did not use extensible ASN.1 types.
|
|
Sending additional fields not in RFC 1510 to these implementations
|
|
results in undefined behavior. Examples of this behavior are known
|
|
to include discarding messages with no error indications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where messages have been changed since RFC 1510, ASN.1 CHOICE types
|
|
are used; one alternative of the CHOICE provides a message which is
|
|
wire-encoding compatible with RFC 1510, and the other alternative
|
|
provides the new, extensible message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementations sending new messages MUST ensure that the recipient
|
|
supports these new messages. Along with each extensible message is a
|
|
guideline for when that message MAY be used. IF that guideline is
|
|
followed, then the recipient is guaranteed to understand the message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3. Backwards Compatibility
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document describes two sets (for the most part) of ASN.1 types.
|
|
The first set of types is wire-encoding compatible with RFC 1510 and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 7]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
[KCLAR]. The second set of types is the set of types enabling
|
|
extensibility. This second set may be referred to as
|
|
"extensibility-enabled types". [ need to make this consistent
|
|
throughout? ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A major difference between the new extensibility-enabled types and
|
|
the types for RFC 1510 compatibility is that the extensibility-
|
|
enabled types allow for the use of UTF-8 encodings in various
|
|
character strings in the protocol. Each party in the protocol must
|
|
have some knowledge of the capabilities of the other parties in the
|
|
protocol. There are methods for establishing this knowledge without
|
|
necessarily requiring explicit configuration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
An extensibility-enabled client can detect whether a KDC supports the
|
|
extensibility-enabled types by requesting an extensibility-enabled
|
|
reply. If the KDC replies with an extensibility-enabled reply, the
|
|
client knows that the KDC supports extensibility. If the KDC issues
|
|
an extensibility-enabled ticket, the client knows that the service
|
|
named in the ticket is extensibility-enabled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4. 1.4.2. Sending Extensible Messages
|
|
|
|
|
|
Care must be taken to make sure that old implementations can
|
|
understand messages sent to them even if they do not understand an
|
|
extension that is used. Unless the sender knows the extension is
|
|
supported, the extension cannot change the semantics of the core
|
|
message or previously defined extensions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, an extension including key information necessary to
|
|
decrypt the encrypted part of a KDC-REP could only be used in
|
|
situations where the recipient was known to support the extension.
|
|
Thus when designing such extensions it is important to provide a way
|
|
for the recipient to notify the sender of support for the extension.
|
|
For example in the case of an extension that changes the KDC-REP
|
|
reply key, the client could indicate support for the extension by
|
|
including a padata element in the AS-REQ sequence. The KDC should
|
|
only use the extension if this padata element is present in the AS-
|
|
REQ. Even if policy requires the use of the extension, it is better
|
|
to return an error indicating that the extension is required than to
|
|
use the extension when the recipient may not support it; debugging
|
|
why implementations do not interoperate is easier when errors are
|
|
returned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5. Criticality
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recipients of unknown message extensions (including typed holes, new
|
|
flags, and ASN.1 extension elements) should preserve the encoding of
|
|
the extension but otherwise ignore the presence of the extension;
|
|
i.e., unknown extensions SHOULD be treated as non-critical. If a
|
|
copy of the message is used later--for example, when a Ticket
|
|
received in a KDC-REP is later used in an AP-REQ--then the unknown
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 8]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
extensions MUST be included.
|
|
|
|
|
|
An implementation SHOULD NOT reject a request merely because it does
|
|
not understand some element of the request. As a related
|
|
consequence, implementations SHOULD handle communicating with other
|
|
implementations which do not implement some requested options. This
|
|
may require designers of options to provide means to determine
|
|
whether an option has been rejected, not understood, or (perhaps
|
|
maliciously) deleted or modified in transit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is one exception to non-criticality described above: if an
|
|
unknown authorization data element is received by a server either in
|
|
an AP-REQ or in a Ticket contained in an AP-REQ, then the
|
|
authentication SHOULD fail. Authorization data is intended to
|
|
restrict the use of a ticket. If the service cannot determine
|
|
whether the restriction applies to that service then a security
|
|
weakness may result if authentication succeeds. Authorization
|
|
elements meant to be truly optional can be enclosed in the AD-IF-
|
|
RELEVANT element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many RFC 1510 implementations ignore unknown authorization data
|
|
elements. Depending on these implementations to honor authorization
|
|
data restrictions may create a security weakness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6. Authenticating Cleartext Portions of Messages
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various denial of service attacks and downgrade attacks against
|
|
Kerberos are possible unless plaintexts are somehow protected against
|
|
modification. An early design goal of Kerberos Version 5 was to
|
|
avoid encrypting more of the authentication exchange that was
|
|
required. (Version 4 doubly-encrypted the encrypted part of a ticket
|
|
in a KDC reply, for example.) This minimization of encryption
|
|
reduces the load on the KDC and busy servers. Also, during the
|
|
initial design of Version 5, the existence of legal restrictions on
|
|
the export of cryptography made it desirable to minimize of the
|
|
number of uses of encryption in the protocol. Unfortunately,
|
|
performing this minimization created numerous instances of
|
|
unauthenticated security-relevant plaintext fields.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The extensible variants of the messages described in this document
|
|
wrap the actual message in an ASN.1 sequence containing a keyed
|
|
checksum of the contents of the message. Guidelines in [XXX] section
|
|
3 specify when the checksum MUST be included and what key MUST be
|
|
used. Guidelines on when to include a checksum are never ambiguous:
|
|
a particular PDU is never correct both with and without a checksum.
|
|
With the exception of the KRB-ERROR message, receiving
|
|
implementations MUST reject messages where a checksum is included and
|
|
not expected or where a checksum is expected but not included. The
|
|
receiving implementation does not always have sufficient information
|
|
to know whether a KRB-ERROR should contain a checksum. Even so,
|
|
KRB-ERROR messages with invalid checksums MUST be rejected and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 9]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
implementations MAY consider the presence or absence of a checksum
|
|
when evaluating whether to trust the error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This authenticated cleartext protection is provided only in the
|
|
extensible variants of the messages; it is never used when
|
|
communicating with an RFC 1510 implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7. Capability Negotiation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerberos is a three-party protocol. Each of the three parties
|
|
involved needs a means of detecting the capabilities supported by the
|
|
others. Two of the parties, the KDC and the application server, do
|
|
not communicate directly in the Kerberos protocol. Communicating
|
|
capabilities from the KDC to the application server requires using a
|
|
ticket as an intermediary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main capability requiring negotiation is the support of the
|
|
extensibility framework described in this document. Negotiation of
|
|
this capability while remaining compatible with RFC 1510
|
|
implementations is possible. The main complication is that the
|
|
client needs to know whether the application server supports the
|
|
extensibility framework prior to sending any message to the
|
|
application server. This can be accomplished if the KDC has
|
|
knowledge of whether an application server supports the extensibility
|
|
framework.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client software advertizes its capabilities when requesting
|
|
credentials from the KDC. If the KDC recognizes the capabilities, it
|
|
acknowledges this fact to the client in its reply. In addition, if
|
|
the KDC has knowledge that the application server supports certain
|
|
capabilities, it also communicates this knowledge to the client in
|
|
its reply. The KDC can encode its own capabilities in the ticket so
|
|
that the application server may discover these capabilities. The
|
|
client advertizes its capabilities to the application server when it
|
|
initiates authentication to the application server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Use of ASN.1 in Kerberos
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerberos uses the ASN.1 Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER) [X690].
|
|
Even though ASN.1 theoretically allows the description of protocol
|
|
messages to be independent of the encoding rules used to encode the
|
|
messages, Kerberos messages MUST be encoded with DER. Subtleties in
|
|
the semantics of the notation, such as whether tags carry any
|
|
semantic content to the application, may cause the use of other ASN.1
|
|
encoding rules to be problematic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementors not using existing ASN.1 tools (e.g., compilers or
|
|
support libraries) are cautioned to thoroughly read and understand
|
|
the actual ASN.1 specification to ensure correct implementation
|
|
behavior. There is more complexity in the notation than is
|
|
immediately obvious, and some tutorials and guides to ASN.1 are
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 10]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
misleading or erroneous. Recommended tutorials and guides include
|
|
[Dub00], [Lar99], though there is still no substitute for reading the
|
|
actual ASN.1 specification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1. Module Header
|
|
|
|
|
|
The type definitions in this document assume an ASN.1 module
|
|
definition of the following form:
|
|
|
|
|
|
KerberosV5Spec3 {
|
|
iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
|
|
security(5) kerberosV5(2) modules(4) krb5spec3(4)
|
|
} DEFINITIONS EXPLICIT TAGS ::= BEGIN
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Rest of definitions here
|
|
|
|
|
|
END
|
|
|
|
|
|
This specifies that the tagging context for the module will be
|
|
explicit and that automatic tagging is not done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some other publications [RFC1510] [RFC1964] erroneously specify an
|
|
object identifier (OID) having an incorrect value of "5" for the
|
|
"dod" component of the OID. In the case of RFC 1964, use of the
|
|
"correct" OID value would result in a change in the wire protocol;
|
|
therefore, the RFC 1964 OID remains unchanged for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2. Top-Level Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ASN.1 type "KRB-PDU" is a CHOICE over all the types (Protocol
|
|
Data Units or PDUs) which an application may directly reference.
|
|
Applications SHOULD NOT transmit any types other than those which are
|
|
alternatives of the KRB-PDU CHOICE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 11]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- top-level type
|
|
--
|
|
-- Applications should not directly reference any types
|
|
-- other than KRB-PDU and its component types.
|
|
--
|
|
KRB-PDU ::= CHOICE {
|
|
ticket Ticket,
|
|
as-req AS-REQ,
|
|
as-rep AS-REP,
|
|
tgs-req TGS-REQ,
|
|
tgs-rep TGS-REP,
|
|
ap-req AP-REQ,
|
|
ap-rep AP-REP,
|
|
krb-safe KRB-SAFE,
|
|
krb-priv KRB-PRIV,
|
|
krb-cred KRB-CRED,
|
|
tgt-req TGT-REQ,
|
|
krb-error KRB-ERROR,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3. Previously Unused ASN.1 Notation (informative)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some aspects of ASN.1 notation used in this document were not used in
|
|
[KCLAR], and may be unfamiliar to some readers. This subsection is
|
|
informative; for normative definitions of the notation, see the
|
|
actual ASN.1 specifications [X680], [X682], [X683].
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3.1. Parameterized Types
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document uses ASN.1 parameterized types [X683] to make
|
|
definitions of types more readable. For some types, some or all of
|
|
the parameters are advisory, i.e., they are not encoded in any form
|
|
for transmission in a protocol message. These advisory parameters
|
|
can describe implementation behavior associated with the type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3.2. COMPONENTS OF Notation
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "COMPONENTS OF" notation, used to define the RFC 1510
|
|
compatibility types, extracts all of the component types of an ASN.1
|
|
SEQUENCE type. The extension marker (the "..." notation) and any
|
|
extension components are not extracted by "COMPONENTS OF". The
|
|
"COMPONENTS OF" notation permits concise definition of multiple types
|
|
which have many components in common with each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3.3. Constraints
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document uses ASN.1 constraints, including the
|
|
"UserDefinedConstraint" notation [X682]. Some constraints can be
|
|
handled automatically by tools that can parse them. Uses of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 12]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
"UserDefinedConstraint" notation (the "CONSTRAINED BY" notation) will
|
|
typically need to have behavior manually coded; the notation provides
|
|
a formalized way of conveying intended implementation behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "WITH COMPONENTS" constraint notation allows constraints to apply
|
|
to component types of a SEQUENCE type. This constraint notation
|
|
effectively allows constraints to "reach into" a type to constrain
|
|
its component types.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4. New Types
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document defines a number of ASN.1 types which are new since
|
|
[KCLAR]. The names of these types will typically have a suffix like
|
|
"Ext", indicating that the types are intended to support
|
|
extensibility. Types original to RFC 1510 and [KCLAR] have been
|
|
renamed to have a suffix like "1510". The "Ext" and "1510" types
|
|
often contain a number of common elements; these common elements have
|
|
a suffix like "Common". The "1510" types have various ASN.1
|
|
constraints applied to them; the constraints limit the possible
|
|
values of the "1510" types to those permitted by RFC 1510 or by
|
|
[KCLAR]. The "Ext" types may have different constraints, typically
|
|
to force string values to be sent as UTF-8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, consider
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- example "common" type
|
|
Foo-Common ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
a [0] INTEGER,
|
|
b [1] OCTET STRING,
|
|
...,
|
|
c [2] INTEGER,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- example "RFC 1510 compatibility" type
|
|
Foo-1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
-- the COMPONENTS OF notation drops the extension marker
|
|
-- and all extension additions.
|
|
COMPONENTS OF Foo-Common
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- example "extensibility-enabled" type
|
|
Foo-Ext ::= Foo-Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
where "Foo-Common" is a common type used to define both the "1510"
|
|
and "Ext" versions of a type. "Foo-1510" is the RFC 1510 version of
|
|
the type, while "Foo-Ext" is the extensible version. "Foo-1510" does
|
|
not contain the extension marker, nor does it contain the extension
|
|
component "c". The type "Foo-1510" is equivalent to "Foo-1510-
|
|
Equiv", shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 13]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- example type equivalent to Foo-1510
|
|
Foo-1510-Equiv ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
a [0] INTEGER,
|
|
b [1] OCTET STRING
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Basic Types
|
|
|
|
|
|
These "basic" Kerberos ASN.1 types appear in multiple other Kerberos
|
|
types.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1. Constrained Integer Types
|
|
|
|
|
|
In RFC 1510, many types contained references to the unconstrained
|
|
INTEGER type. Since an unconstrained INTEGER can contain almost any
|
|
possible abstract integer value, most of the unconstrained references
|
|
to INTEGER in RFC 1510 were constrained to 32 bits or smaller in
|
|
[KCLAR].
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- signed values representable in 32 bits
|
|
--
|
|
-- These are often used as assigned numbers for various things.
|
|
Int32 ::= INTEGER (-2147483648..2147483647)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "Int32" type often contains an assigned number identifying the
|
|
contents of a typed hole. Unless otherwise stated, non-negative
|
|
values are registered, and negative values are available for local
|
|
use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- unsigned 32 bit values
|
|
UInt32 ::= INTEGER (0..4294967295)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "UInt32" type is used in some places where an unsigned 32-bit
|
|
integer is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- unsigned 64 bit values
|
|
UInt64 ::= INTEGER (0..18446744073709551615)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "UInt64" type is used in places where 32 bits of precision may
|
|
provide inadequate security.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- sequence numbers
|
|
SeqNum ::= UInt64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequence numbers were constrained to 32 bits in [KCLAR], but this
|
|
document allows for 64-bit sequence numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- nonces
|
|
Nonce ::= UInt64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 14]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Likewise, nonces were constrained to 32 bits in [KCLAR], but expanded
|
|
to 64 bits here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- microseconds
|
|
Microseconds ::= INTEGER (0..999999)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "microseconds" type is intended to carry the microseconds part of
|
|
a time value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2. KerberosTime
|
|
|
|
|
|
KerberosTime ::= GeneralizedTime (CONSTRAINED BY {
|
|
-- MUST NOT include fractional seconds
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
The timestamps used in Kerberos are encoded as GeneralizedTimes. A
|
|
KerberosTime value MUST NOT include any fractional portions of the
|
|
seconds. As required by the DER, it further MUST NOT include any
|
|
separators, and it specifies the UTC time zone (Z). Example: The
|
|
only valid format for UTC time 6 minutes, 27 seconds after 9 pm on 6
|
|
November 1985 is "19851106210627Z".
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3. KerberosString
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- used for names and for error messages
|
|
KerberosString ::= CHOICE {
|
|
ia5 GeneralString (IA5String),
|
|
utf8 UTF8String,
|
|
... -- no extension may be sent
|
|
-- to an rfc1510 implementation --
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
The KerberosString type is used for character strings in various
|
|
places in the Kerberos protocol. For compatibility with RFC 1510,
|
|
GeneralString values constrained to IA5String (US-ASCII) are
|
|
permitted in messages exchanged with RFC 1510 implementations. The
|
|
new protocol messages contain strings encoded as UTF-8, and these
|
|
strings MUST be normalized using [SASLPREP]. KerberosString values
|
|
are present in principal names and in error messages. Control
|
|
characters SHOULD NOT be used in principal names, and used with
|
|
caution in error messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- IA5 choice only; useful for constraints
|
|
KerberosStringIA5 ::= KerberosString
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS { ia5 PRESENT })
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- IA5 excluded; useful for constraints
|
|
KerberosStringExt ::= KerberosString
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS { ia5 ABSENT })
|
|
|
|
|
|
KerberosStringIA5 requires the use of the "ia5" alternative, while
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 15]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KerberosStringExt forbids it. These types appear in ASN.1
|
|
constraints on messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For detailed background regarding the history of character string use
|
|
in Kerberos, as well as discussion of some compatibility issues, see
|
|
Appendix B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4. Language Tags
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- used for language tags
|
|
LangTag ::= PrintableString
|
|
(FROM ("A".."Z" | "a".."z" | "0".."9" | "-"))
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "LangTag" type is used to specify language tags for localization
|
|
purposes, using the [RFC3066] format.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5. KerberosFlags
|
|
|
|
|
|
For several message types, a specific constrained bit string type,
|
|
KerberosFlags, is used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KerberosFlags { NamedBits } ::= BIT STRING (SIZE (32..MAX))
|
|
(CONSTRAINED BY {
|
|
-- MUST be a valid value of -- NamedBits
|
|
-- but if the value to be sent would be truncated to shorter
|
|
-- than 32 bits according to DER, the value MUST be padded
|
|
-- with trailing zero bits to 32 bits. Otherwise, no
|
|
-- trailing zero bits may be present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The actual bit string type encoded in Kerberos messages does not use
|
|
named bits. The advisory parameter of the KerberosFlags type names a
|
|
bit string type defined using named bits, whose value is encoded as
|
|
if it were a bit string with unnamed bits. This practice is
|
|
necessary because the DER require trailing zero bits to be removed
|
|
when encoding bit strings defined using named bits. Existing
|
|
implementations of Kerberos send exactly 32 bits rather than
|
|
truncating, so the size constraint requires the transmission of at
|
|
least 32 bits. Trailing zero bits beyond the first 32 bits are
|
|
truncated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6. Typed Holes
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Typed hole identifiers
|
|
TH-id ::= CHOICE {
|
|
int32 Int32,
|
|
rel-oid RELATIVE-OID
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 16]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "TH-id" type is a generalized means to identify the contents of a
|
|
typed hole. The "int32" alternative may be used for simple integer
|
|
assignments, in the same manner as "Int32", while the "rel-oid"
|
|
alternative may be used for hierarchical delegation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7. HostAddress and HostAddresses
|
|
|
|
|
|
AddrType ::= Int32
|
|
|
|
|
|
HostAddress ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
addr-type [0] AddrType,
|
|
address [1] OCTET STRING
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- NOTE: HostAddresses is always used as an OPTIONAL field and
|
|
-- should not be a zero-length SEQUENCE OF.
|
|
--
|
|
-- The extensible messages explicitly constrain this to be
|
|
-- non-empty.
|
|
HostAddresses ::= SEQUENCE OF HostAddress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
addr-type
|
|
This field specifies the type of address that follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
address
|
|
This field encodes a single address of the type identified by
|
|
"addr-type".
|
|
|
|
|
|
All negative values for the host address type are reserved for local
|
|
use. All non-negative values are reserved for officially assigned
|
|
type fields and interpretations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
addr-type | meaning
|
|
__________|______________
|
|
2 | IPv4
|
|
3 | directional
|
|
12 | DECnet
|
|
20 | NetBIOS
|
|
24 | IPv6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.1. Internet (IPv4) Addresses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internet (IPv4) addresses are 32-bit (4-octet) quantities, encoded in
|
|
MSB order (most significant byte first). The IPv4 loopback address
|
|
SHOULD NOT appear in a Kerberos PDU. The type of IPv4 addresses is
|
|
two (2).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 17]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.2. Internet (IPv6) Addresses
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPv6 addresses [RFC2373] are 128-bit (16-octet) quantities, encoded
|
|
in MSB order (most significant byte first). The type of IPv6
|
|
addresses is twenty-four (24). The following addresses MUST NOT
|
|
appear in any Kerberos PDU:
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the Unspecified Address
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the Loopback Address
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Link-Local addresses
|
|
|
|
|
|
This restriction applies to the inclusion in the address fields of
|
|
Kerberos PDUs, but not to the address fields of packets that might
|
|
carry such PDUs. The restriction is necessary because the use of an
|
|
address with non-global scope could allow the acceptance of a message
|
|
sent from a node that may have the same address, but which is not the
|
|
host intended by the entity that added the restriction. If the
|
|
link-local address type needs to be used for communication, then the
|
|
address restriction in tickets must not be used (i.e. addressless
|
|
tickets must be used).
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses MUST be represented as addresses of type
|
|
2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.3. DECnet Phase IV addresses
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECnet Phase IV addresses are 16-bit addresses, encoded in LSB order.
|
|
The type of DECnet Phase IV addresses is twelve (12).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.4. Netbios addresses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netbios addresses are 16-octet addresses typically composed of 1 to
|
|
15 alphanumeric characters and padded with the US-ASCII SPC character
|
|
(code 32). The 16th octet MUST be the US-ASCII NUL character (code
|
|
0). The type of Netbios addresses is twenty (20).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.5. Directional Addresses
|
|
|
|
|
|
In many environments, including the sender address in KRB-SAFE and
|
|
KRB-PRIV messages is undesirable because the addresses may be changed
|
|
in transport by network address translators. However, if these
|
|
addresses are removed, the messages may be subject to a reflection
|
|
attack in which a message is reflected back to its originator. The
|
|
directional address type provides a way to avoid transport addresses
|
|
and reflection attacks. Directional addresses are encoded as four
|
|
byte unsigned integers in network byte order. If the message is
|
|
originated by the party sending the original AP-REQ message, then an
|
|
address of 0 SHOULD be used. If the message is originated by the
|
|
party to whom that AP-REQ was sent, then the address 1 SHOULD be
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 18]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
used. Applications involving multiple parties can specify the use of
|
|
other addresses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directional addresses MUST only be used for the sender address field
|
|
in the KRB-SAFE or KRB-PRIV messages. They MUST NOT be used as a
|
|
ticket address or in a AP-REQ message. This address type SHOULD only
|
|
be used in situations where the sending party knows that the
|
|
receiving party supports the address type. This generally means that
|
|
directional addresses may only be used when the application protocol
|
|
requires their support. Directional addresses are type (3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Principals
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principals are participants in the Kerberos protocol. A "realm"
|
|
consists of principals in one administrative domain, served by one
|
|
KDC (or one replicated set of KDCs). Each principal name has an
|
|
arbitrary number of components, though typical principal names will
|
|
only have one or two components. A principal name is meant to be
|
|
readable by and meaningful to humans, especially in a realm lacking a
|
|
centrally adminstered authorization infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1. Name Types
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each PrincipalName has NameType indicating what sort of name it is.
|
|
The name-type SHOULD be treated as a hint. Ignoring the name type,
|
|
no two names can be the same (i.e., at least one of the components,
|
|
or the realm, must be different).
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- assigned numbers for name types (used in principal names)
|
|
NameType ::= Int32
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Name type not known
|
|
nt-unknown NameType ::= 0
|
|
-- Just the name of the principal as in DCE, or for users
|
|
nt-principal NameType ::= 1
|
|
-- Service and other unique instance (krbtgt)
|
|
nt-srv-inst NameType ::= 2
|
|
-- Service with host name as instance (telnet, rcommands)
|
|
nt-srv-hst NameType ::= 3
|
|
-- Service with host as remaining components
|
|
nt-srv-xhst NameType ::= 4
|
|
-- Unique ID
|
|
nt-uid NameType ::= 5
|
|
-- Encoded X.509 Distingished name [RFC 2253]
|
|
nt-x500-principal NameType ::= 6
|
|
-- Name in form of SMTP email name (e.g. user@foo.com)
|
|
nt-smtp-name NameType ::= 7
|
|
-- Enterprise name - may be mapped to principal name
|
|
nt-enterprise NameType ::= 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 19]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2. Principal Type Definition
|
|
|
|
|
|
PrincipalName ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
name-type [0] NameType,
|
|
-- May have zero elements, or individual elements may be
|
|
-- zero-length, but this is NOT RECOMMENDED.
|
|
name-string [1] SEQUENCE OF KerberosString
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
name-type
|
|
hint of the type of name that follows
|
|
|
|
|
|
name-string
|
|
The "name-string" encodes a sequence of components that form a
|
|
name, each component encoded as a KerberosString. Taken
|
|
together, a PrincipalName and a Realm form a principal
|
|
identifier. Most PrincipalNames will have only a few components
|
|
(typically one or two).
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3. Principal Name Reuse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realm administrators SHOULD use extreme caution when considering
|
|
reusing a principal name. A service administrator might explicitly
|
|
enter principal names into a local access control list (ACL) for the
|
|
service. If such local ACLs exist independently of a centrally
|
|
administered authorization infrastructure, realm administrators
|
|
SHOULD NOT reuse principal names until confirming that all extant ACL
|
|
entries referencing that principal name have been updated. Failure
|
|
to perform this check can result in a security vulnerability, as a
|
|
new principal can inadvertently inherit unauthorized privileges upon
|
|
receiving a reused principal name. An organization whose Kerberos-
|
|
authenticated services all use a centrally-adminstered authorization
|
|
infrastructure may not need to take these precautions regarding
|
|
principal name reuse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4. Realm Names
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realm ::= KerberosString
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- IA5 only
|
|
RealmIA5 ::= Realm (KerberosStringIA5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- IA5 excluded
|
|
RealmExt ::= Realm (KerberosStringExt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerberos realm names are KerberosStrings. Realms MUST NOT contain a
|
|
character with the code 0 (the US-ASCII NUL). Most realms will
|
|
usually consist of several components separated by periods (.), in
|
|
the style of Internet Domain Names, or separated by slashes (/) in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 20]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
the style of X.500 names.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5. Printable Representations of Principal Names
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ perhaps non-normative? ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
The printable form of a principal name consists of the concatenation
|
|
of components of the PrincipalName value using the slash character
|
|
(/), followed by an at-sign (@), followed by the realm name. Any
|
|
occurrence of a backslash (\), slash (/) or at-sign (@) in the
|
|
PrincipalName value is quoted by a backslash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6. Ticket-Granting Service Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PrincipalName value corresponding to a ticket-granting service
|
|
has two components: the first component is the string "krbtgt", and
|
|
the second component is the realm name of the TGS which will accept a
|
|
ticket-granting ticket having this service principal name. The realm
|
|
name of service always indicates which realm issued the ticket. A
|
|
ticket-granting ticket issued by "A.EXAMPLE.COM" which is valid for
|
|
obtaining tickets in the same realm would have the following ASN.1
|
|
values for its "realm" and "sname" components, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Example Realm and PrincipalName for a TGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
tgtRealm1 Realm ::= ia5 : "A.EXAMPLE.COM"
|
|
|
|
|
|
tgtPrinc1 PrincipalName ::= {
|
|
name-type nt-srv-inst,
|
|
name-string { ia5 : "krbtgt", ia5 : "A.EXAMPLE.COM" }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its printable representation would be written as
|
|
"krbtgt/A.EXAMPLE.COM@A.EXAMPLE.COM".
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6.1. Cross-Realm TGS Principals
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is possible for a principal in one realm to authenticate to a
|
|
service in another realm. A KDC can issue a cross-realm ticket-
|
|
granting ticket to allow one of its principals to authenticate to a
|
|
service in a foreign realm. For example, the TGS principal
|
|
"krbtgt/B.EXAMPLE.COM@A.EXAMPLE.COM" is a principal that permits a
|
|
client principal in the realm A.EXAMPLE.COM to authenticate to a
|
|
service in the realm B.EXAMPLE.COM. When the KDC for B.EXAMPLE.COM
|
|
issues a ticket to a client originating in A.EXAMPLE.COM, the
|
|
client's realm name remains "A.EXAMPLE.COM", even though the service
|
|
principal will have the realm "B.EXAMPLE.COM".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 21]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Types Relating to Encryption
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many Kerberos protocol messages contain encrypted encodings of
|
|
various data types. Some Kerberos protocol messages also contain
|
|
checksums (signatures) of encodings of various types.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1. Assigned Numbers for Encryption
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encryption algorithm identifiers and key usages both have assigned
|
|
numbers, described in [KCRYPTO].
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1.1. EType
|
|
|
|
|
|
EType is the integer type for assigned numbers for encryption
|
|
algorithms. Defined in [KCRYPTO].
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Assigned numbers denoting encryption mechanisms.
|
|
EType ::= Int32
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- assigned numbers for encryption schemes
|
|
et-des-cbc-crc EType ::= 1
|
|
et-des-cbc-md4 EType ::= 2
|
|
et-des-cbc-md5 EType ::= 3
|
|
-- [reserved] 4
|
|
et-des3-cbc-md5 EType ::= 5
|
|
-- [reserved] 6
|
|
et-des3-cbc-sha1 EType ::= 7
|
|
et-dsaWithSHA1-CmsOID EType ::= 9
|
|
et-md5WithRSAEncryption-CmsOID EType ::= 10
|
|
et-sha1WithRSAEncryption-CmsOID EType ::= 11
|
|
et-rc2CBC-EnvOID EType ::= 12
|
|
et-rsaEncryption-EnvOID EType ::= 13
|
|
et-rsaES-OAEP-ENV-OID EType ::= 14
|
|
et-des-ede3-cbc-Env-OID EType ::= 15
|
|
et-des3-cbc-sha1-kd EType ::= 16
|
|
-- AES
|
|
et-aes128-cts-hmac-sha1-96 EType ::= 17
|
|
-- AES
|
|
et-aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96 EType ::= 18
|
|
-- Microsoft
|
|
et-rc4-hmac EType ::= 23
|
|
-- Microsoft
|
|
et-rc4-hmac-exp EType ::= 24
|
|
-- opaque; PacketCable
|
|
et-subkey-keymaterial EType ::= 65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1.2. Key Usages
|
|
|
|
|
|
KeyUsage is the integer type for assigned numbers for key usages.
|
|
Key usage values are inputs to the encryption and decryption
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 22]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
functions described in [KCRYPTO].
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Assigned numbers denoting key usages.
|
|
KeyUsage ::= UInt32
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- Actual identifier names are provisional and subject to
|
|
-- change.
|
|
--
|
|
ku-pa-enc-ts KeyUsage ::= 1
|
|
ku-Ticket KeyUsage ::= 2
|
|
ku-EncASRepPart KeyUsage ::= 3
|
|
ku-TGSReqAuthData-sesskey KeyUsage ::= 4
|
|
ku-TGSReqAuthData-subkey KeyUsage ::= 5
|
|
ku-pa-TGSReq-cksum KeyUsage ::= 6
|
|
ku-pa-TGSReq-authenticator KeyUsage ::= 7
|
|
ku-EncTGSRepPart-sesskey KeyUsage ::= 8
|
|
ku-EncTGSRepPart-subkey KeyUsage ::= 9
|
|
ku-Authenticator-cksum KeyUsage ::= 10
|
|
ku-APReq-authenticator KeyUsage ::= 11
|
|
ku-EncAPRepPart KeyUsage ::= 12
|
|
ku-EncKrbPrivPart KeyUsage ::= 13
|
|
ku-EncKrbCredPart KeyUsage ::= 14
|
|
ku-KrbSafe-cksum KeyUsage ::= 15
|
|
ku-ad-KDCIssued-cksum KeyUsage ::= 19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- The following numbers are provisional...
|
|
-- conflicts may exist elsewhere.
|
|
ku-Ticket-cksum KeyUsage ::= 25
|
|
ku-ASReq-cksum KeyUsage ::= 26
|
|
ku-TGSReq-cksum KeyUsage ::= 27
|
|
ku-ASRep-cksum KeyUsage ::= 28
|
|
ku-TGSRep-cksum KeyUsage ::= 29
|
|
ku-APReq-cksum KeyUsage ::= 30
|
|
ku-APRep-cksum KeyUsage ::= 31
|
|
ku-KrbCred-cksum KeyUsage ::= 32
|
|
ku-KrbError-cksum KeyUsage ::= 33
|
|
ku-KDCRep-cksum KeyUsage ::= 34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2. Which Key to Use
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 23]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- KeyToUse identifies which key is to be used to encrypt or
|
|
-- sign a given value.
|
|
--
|
|
-- Values of KeyToUse are never actually transmitted over the
|
|
-- wire, or even used directly by the implementation in any
|
|
-- way, as key usages are; it exists primarily to identify
|
|
-- which key gets used for what purpose. Thus, the specific
|
|
-- numeric values associated with this type are irrelevant.
|
|
KeyToUse ::= ENUMERATED {
|
|
-- unspecified
|
|
key-unspecified,
|
|
-- server long term key
|
|
key-server,
|
|
-- client long term key
|
|
key-client,
|
|
-- key selected by KDC for encryption of a KDC-REP
|
|
key-kdc-rep,
|
|
-- session key from ticket
|
|
key-session,
|
|
-- subsession key negotiated via AP-REQ/AP-REP
|
|
key-subsession,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3. EncryptionKey
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "EncryptionKey" type holds an encryption key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncryptionKey ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
keytype [0] EType,
|
|
keyvalue [1] OCTET STRING
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
keytype
|
|
This "EType" identifies the encryption algorithm, described in
|
|
[KCRYPTO].
|
|
|
|
|
|
keyvalue
|
|
Contains the actual key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4. EncryptedData
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "EncryptedData" type contains the encryption of another data
|
|
type. The recipient uses fields within EncryptedData to determine
|
|
which key to use for decryption.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 24]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- "Type" specifies which ASN.1 type is encrypted to the
|
|
-- ciphertext in the EncryptedData. "Keys" specifies a set of
|
|
-- keys of which one key may be used to encrypt the data.
|
|
-- "KeyUsages" specifies a set of key usages, one of which may
|
|
-- be used to encrypt.
|
|
--
|
|
-- None of the parameters is transmitted over the wire.
|
|
EncryptedData {
|
|
Type, KeyToUse:Keys, KeyUsage:KeyUsages
|
|
} ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
etype [0] EType,
|
|
kvno [1] UInt32 OPTIONAL,
|
|
cipher [2] OCTET STRING (CONSTRAINED BY {
|
|
-- must be encryption of --
|
|
OCTET STRING (CONTAINING Type),
|
|
-- with one of the keys -- KeyToUse:Keys,
|
|
-- with key usage being one of --
|
|
KeyUsage:KeyUsages
|
|
}),
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KeyUsages
|
|
Advisory parameter indicating which key usage to use when
|
|
encrypting the ciphertext. If "KeyUsages" indicate multiple
|
|
"KeyUsage" values, the detailed description of the containing
|
|
message will indicate which key to use under which conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Advisory parameter indicating the ASN.1 type whose DER encoding
|
|
is the plaintext encrypted into the EncryptedData.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keys
|
|
Advisory parameter indicating which key to use to perform the
|
|
encryption. If "Keys" indicate multiple "KeyToUse" values, the
|
|
detailed description of the containing message will indicate
|
|
which key to use under which conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KeyUsages
|
|
Advisory parameter indicating which "KeyUsage" value is used to
|
|
encrypt. If "KeyUsages" indicates multiple "KeyUsage" values,
|
|
the detailed description of the containing message will indicate
|
|
which key usage to use under which conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5. Checksums
|
|
|
|
|
|
Several types contain checksums (actually signatures) of data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 25]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
CksumType ::= Int32
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- The parameters specify which key to use to produce the
|
|
-- signature, as well as which key usage to use. The
|
|
-- parameters are not actually sent over the wire.
|
|
Checksum {
|
|
KeyToUse:Keys, KeyUsage:KeyUsages
|
|
} ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
cksumtype [0] CksumType,
|
|
checksum [1] OCTET STRING (CONSTRAINED BY {
|
|
-- signed using one of the keys --
|
|
KeyToUse:Keys,
|
|
-- with key usage being one of --
|
|
KeyUsage:KeyUsages
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CksumType
|
|
Integer type for assigned numbers for signature algorithms.
|
|
Defined in [KCRYPTO]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keys
|
|
As in EncryptedData
|
|
|
|
|
|
KeyUsages
|
|
As in EncryptedData
|
|
|
|
|
|
cksumtype
|
|
Signature algorithm used to produce the signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
checksum
|
|
The actual checksum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.1. ChecksumOf
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChecksumOf is similar to "Checksum", but specifies which type is
|
|
signed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- a Checksum that must contain the checksum
|
|
-- of a particular type
|
|
ChecksumOf {
|
|
Type, KeyToUse:Keys, KeyUsage:KeyUsages
|
|
} ::= Checksum { Keys, KeyUsages } (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
checksum (CONSTRAINED BY {
|
|
-- must be checksum of --
|
|
OCTET STRING (CONTAINING Type)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 26]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Indicates the ASN.1 type whose DER encoding is signed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.2. Signed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed is similar to "ChecksumOf", but contains an actual instance of
|
|
the type being signed in addition to the signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- parameterized type for wrapping authenticated plaintext
|
|
Signed {
|
|
InnerType, KeyToUse:Keys, KeyUsage:KeyUsages
|
|
} ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
cksum [0] ChecksumOf {
|
|
InnerType, Keys, KeyUsages
|
|
} OPTIONAL,
|
|
inner [1] InnerType,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Tickets
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ A large number of items described here are duplicated in the
|
|
sections describing KDC-REQ processing. Should find a way to avoid
|
|
this duplication. ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A ticket binds a principal name to a session key. The important
|
|
fields of a ticket are in the encrypted part. The components in
|
|
common between the RFC 1510 and the extensible versions are
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncTicketPartCommon ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
flags [0] TicketFlags,
|
|
key [1] EncryptionKey,
|
|
crealm [2] Realm,
|
|
cname [3] PrincipalName,
|
|
transited [4] TransitedEncoding,
|
|
authtime [5] KerberosTime,
|
|
starttime [6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
endtime [7] KerberosTime,
|
|
renew-till [8] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
caddr [9] HostAddresses OPTIONAL,
|
|
authorization-data [10] AuthorizationData OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crealm
|
|
This field contains the client's realm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
cname
|
|
This field contains the client's name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 27]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
caddr
|
|
This field lists the network addresses (if absent, all addresses
|
|
are permitted) from which the ticket is valid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptions of the other fields appear in the following sections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1. Timestamps
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three of the ticket timestamps may be requested from the KDC. The
|
|
timestamps may differ from those requested, depending on site policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
authtime
|
|
The time at which the client authenticated, as recorded by the
|
|
KDC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
starttime
|
|
The earliest time when the ticket is valid. If not present, the
|
|
ticket is valid starting at the authtime. This is requested as
|
|
the "from" field of KDC-REQ-BODY-COMMON.
|
|
|
|
|
|
endtime
|
|
This time is requested in the "till" field of KDC-REQ-BODY-
|
|
COMMON. Contains the time after which the ticket will not be
|
|
honored (its expiration time). Note that individual services
|
|
MAY place their own limits on the life of a ticket and MAY
|
|
reject tickets which have not yet expired. As such, this is
|
|
really an upper bound on the expiration time for the ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
renew-till
|
|
This time is requested in the "rtime" field of KDC-REQ-BODY-
|
|
COMMON. It is only present in tickets that have the "renewable"
|
|
flag set in the flags field. It indicates the maximum endtime
|
|
that may be included in a renewal. It can be thought of as the
|
|
absolute expiration time for the ticket, including all renewals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2. Ticket Flags
|
|
|
|
|
|
A number of flags may be set in the ticket, further defining some of
|
|
its capabilities. Some of these flags map to flags in a KDC request.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 28]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
TicketFlags ::= KerberosFlags { TicketFlagsBits }
|
|
|
|
|
|
TicketFlagsBits ::= BIT STRING {
|
|
reserved (0),
|
|
forwardable (1),
|
|
forwarded (2),
|
|
proxiable (3),
|
|
proxy (4),
|
|
may-postdate (5),
|
|
postdated (6),
|
|
invalid (7),
|
|
renewable (8),
|
|
initial (9),
|
|
pre-authent (10),
|
|
hw-authent (11),
|
|
transited-policy-checked (12),
|
|
ok-as-delegate (13),
|
|
anonymous (14),
|
|
cksummed-ticket (15)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2.1. Flags Relating to Initial Ticket Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ adapted KCLAR 2.1. ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Several flags indicate the details of how the initial ticket was
|
|
acquired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial
|
|
The "initial" flag indicates that a ticket was issued using the
|
|
AS protocol, rather than issued based on a ticket-granting
|
|
ticket. Application servers (e.g., a password-changing program)
|
|
requiring a client's definite knowledge of its secret key can
|
|
insist that this flag be set in any tickets they accept, thus
|
|
being assured that the client's key was recently presented to
|
|
the application client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-authent
|
|
The "pre-authent" flag indicates that some sort of pre-
|
|
authentication was used during the AS exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hw-authent
|
|
The "hw-authent" flag indicates that some sort of hardware-based
|
|
pre-authentication occurred during the AS exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both the "pre-authent" and the "hw-authent" flags may be present with
|
|
or without the "initial" flag; such tickets with the "initial" flag
|
|
clear are ones which are derived from initial tickets with the "pre-
|
|
authent" or "hw-authent" flags set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 29]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2.2. Invalid Tickets
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ KCLAR 2.2. ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "invalid" flag indicates that a ticket is invalid. Application
|
|
servers MUST reject tickets which have this flag set. A postdated
|
|
ticket will be issued in this form. Invalid tickets MUST be
|
|
validated by the KDC before use, by presenting them to the KDC in a
|
|
TGS request with the "validate" option specified. The KDC will only
|
|
validate tickets after their starttime has passed. The validation is
|
|
required so that postdated tickets which have been stolen before
|
|
their starttime can be rendered permanently invalid (through a hot-
|
|
list mechanism -- see Section 8.3.2.4).
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2.3. OK as Delegate
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ KCLAR 2.8. ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "ok-as-delegate" flag provides a way for a KDC to communicate
|
|
local realm policy to a client regarding whether the service for
|
|
which the ticket is issued is trusted to accept delegated
|
|
credentials. For some applications, a client may need to delegate
|
|
credentials to a service to act on its behalf in contacting other
|
|
services. The ability of a client to obtain a service ticket for a
|
|
service conveys no information to the client about whether the
|
|
service should be trusted to accept delegated credentials.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The copy of the ticket flags visible to the client may have the "ok-
|
|
as-delegate" flag set to indicate to the client that the service
|
|
specified in the ticket has been determined by policy of the realm to
|
|
be a suitable recipient of delegation. A client can use the presence
|
|
of this flag to help it make a decision whether to delegate
|
|
credentials (either grant a proxy or a forwarded ticket-granting
|
|
ticket) to this service. It is acceptable to ignore the value of
|
|
this flag. When setting this flag, an administrator should consider
|
|
the security and placement of the server on which the service will
|
|
run, as well as whether the service requires the use of delegated
|
|
credentials.
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2.4. Renewable Tickets
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ adapted KCLAR 2.3. ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "renewable" flag indicates whether the ticket may be renewed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewable tickets can be used to mitigate the consequences of ticket
|
|
theft. Applications may desire to hold credentials which can be
|
|
valid for long periods of time. However, this can expose the
|
|
credentials to potential theft for equally long periods, and those
|
|
stolen credentials would be valid until the expiration time of the
|
|
ticket(s). Simply using short-lived tickets and obtaining new ones
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 30]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
periodically would require the application to have long-term access
|
|
to the client's secret key, which is an even greater risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewable tickets have two "expiration times": the first is when the
|
|
current instance of the ticket expires, and the second is the latest
|
|
permissible value for an individual expiration time. An application
|
|
client must periodically present an unexpired renewable ticket to the
|
|
KDC, setting the "renew" option in the KDC request. The KDC will
|
|
issue a new ticket with a new session key and a later expiration
|
|
time. All other fields of the ticket are left unmodified by the
|
|
renewal process. When the latest permissible expiration time
|
|
arrives, the ticket expires permanently. At each renewal, the KDC
|
|
MAY consult a hot-list to determine if the ticket had been reported
|
|
stolen since its last renewal; it will refuse to renew such stolen
|
|
tickets, and thus the usable lifetime of stolen tickets is reduced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "renewable" flag in a ticket is normally only interpreted by the
|
|
ticket-granting service. It can usually be ignored by application
|
|
servers. However, some particularly careful application servers MAY
|
|
disallow renewable tickets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a renewable ticket is not renewed by its expiration time, the KDC
|
|
will not renew the ticket. The "renewable" flag is clear by default,
|
|
but a client can request it be set by setting the "renewable" option
|
|
in the AS-REQ message. If it is set, then the "renew-till" field in
|
|
the ticket contains the time after which the ticket may not be
|
|
renewed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2.5. Postdated Tickets
|
|
|
|
|
|
postdated
|
|
indicates a ticket which has been postdated
|
|
|
|
|
|
may-postdate
|
|
indicates that postdated tickets may be issued based on this
|
|
ticket
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ KCLAR 2.4. ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications may occasionally need to obtain tickets for use much
|
|
later, e.g., a batch submission system would need tickets to be valid
|
|
at the time the batch job is serviced. However, it is dangerous to
|
|
hold valid tickets in a batch queue, since they will be on-line
|
|
longer and more prone to theft. Postdated tickets provide a way to
|
|
obtain these tickets from the KDC at job submission time, but to
|
|
leave them "dormant" until they are activated and validated by a
|
|
further request of the KDC. If a ticket theft were reported in the
|
|
interim, the KDC would refuse to validate the ticket, and the thief
|
|
would be foiled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 31]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "may-postdate" flag in a ticket is normally only interpreted by
|
|
the TGS. It can be ignored by application servers. This flag MUST
|
|
be set in a ticket-granting ticket in order for the KDC to issue a
|
|
postdated ticket based on the presented ticket. It is reset by
|
|
default; it MAY be requested by a client by setting the "allow-
|
|
postdate" option in the AS-REQ [?also TGS-REQ?] message. This flag
|
|
does not allow a client to obtain a postdated ticket-granting ticket;
|
|
postdated ticket-granting tickets can only by obtained by requesting
|
|
the postdating in the AS-REQ message. The life (endtime minus
|
|
starttime) of a postdated ticket will be the remaining life of the
|
|
ticket-granting ticket at the time of the request, unless the
|
|
"renewable" option is also set, in which case it can be the full life
|
|
(endtime minus starttime) of the ticket-granting ticket. The KDC MAY
|
|
limit how far in the future a ticket may be postdated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "postdated" flag indicates that a ticket has been postdated. The
|
|
application server can check the authtime field in the ticket to see
|
|
when the original authentication occurred. Some services MAY choose
|
|
to reject postdated tickets, or they may only accept them within a
|
|
certain period after the original authentication. When the KDC
|
|
issues a "postdated" ticket, it will also be marked as "invalid", so
|
|
that the application client MUST present the ticket to the KDC for
|
|
validation before use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2.6. Proxiable and Proxy Tickets
|
|
|
|
|
|
proxy
|
|
indicates a proxy ticket
|
|
|
|
|
|
proxiable
|
|
indicates that proxy tickets may be issued based on this ticket
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ KCLAR 2.5. ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
It may be necessary for a principal to allow a service to perform an
|
|
operation on its behalf. The service must be able to take on the
|
|
identity of the client, but only for a particular purpose. A
|
|
principal can allow a service to take on the principal's identity for
|
|
a particular purpose by granting it a proxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The process of granting a proxy using the "proxy" and "proxiable"
|
|
flags is used to provide credentials for use with specific services.
|
|
Though conceptually also a proxy, users wishing to delegate their
|
|
identity in a form usable for all purposes MUST use the ticket
|
|
forwarding mechanism described in the next section to forward a
|
|
ticket-granting ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "proxiable" flag in a ticket is normally only interpreted by the
|
|
ticket-granting service. It can be ignored by application servers.
|
|
When set, this flag tells the ticket-granting server that it is OK to
|
|
issue a new ticket (but not a ticket-granting ticket) with a
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 32]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
different network address based on this ticket. This flag is set if
|
|
requested by the client on initial authentication. By default, the
|
|
client will request that it be set when requesting a ticket-granting
|
|
ticket, and reset when requesting any other ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This flag allows a client to pass a proxy to a server to perform a
|
|
remote request on its behalf (e.g. a print service client can give
|
|
the print server a proxy to access the client's files on a particular
|
|
file server in order to satisfy a print request).
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to complicate the use of stolen credentials, Kerberos
|
|
tickets may contain a set of network addresses from which they are
|
|
valid. When granting a proxy, the client MUST specify the new
|
|
network address from which the proxy is to be used, or indicate that
|
|
the proxy is to be issued for use from any address.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "proxy" flag is set in a ticket by the TGS when it issues a proxy
|
|
ticket. Application servers MAY check this flag and at their option
|
|
they MAY require additional authentication from the agent presenting
|
|
the proxy in order to provide an audit trail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2.7. Forwarded and Forwardable Tickets
|
|
|
|
|
|
forwarded
|
|
indicates a forwarded ticket
|
|
|
|
|
|
forwardable
|
|
indicates that forwarded tickets may be issued based on this
|
|
ticket
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ KCLAR 2.6. ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authentication forwarding is an instance of a proxy where the service
|
|
that is granted is complete use of the client's identity. An example
|
|
where it might be used is when a user logs in to a remote system and
|
|
wants authentication to work from that system as if the login were
|
|
local.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "forwardable" flag in a ticket is normally only interpreted by
|
|
the ticket-granting service. It can be ignored by application
|
|
servers. The "forwardable" flag has an interpretation similar to
|
|
that of the "proxiable" flag, except ticket-granting tickets may also
|
|
be issued with different network addresses. This flag is reset by
|
|
default, but users MAY request that it be set by setting the
|
|
"forwardable" option in the AS request when they request their
|
|
initial ticket-granting ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This flag allows for authentication forwarding without requiring the
|
|
user to enter a password again. If the flag is not set, then
|
|
authentication forwarding is not permitted, but the same result can
|
|
still be achieved if the user engages in the AS exchange specifying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 33]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
the requested network addresses and supplies a password.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "forwarded" flag is set by the TGS when a client presents a
|
|
ticket with the "forwardable" flag set and requests a forwarded
|
|
ticket by specifying the "forwarded" KDC option and supplying a set
|
|
of addresses for the new ticket. It is also set in all tickets
|
|
issued based on tickets with the "forwarded" flag set. Application
|
|
servers may choose to process "forwarded" tickets differently than
|
|
non-forwarded tickets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If addressless tickets are forwarded from one system to another,
|
|
clients SHOULD still use this option to obtain a new TGT in order to
|
|
have different session keys on the different systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3. Transited Realms
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ KCLAR 2.7., plus new stuff ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4. Authorization Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ KCLAR 5.2.6. ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADType ::= TH-id
|
|
|
|
|
|
AuthorizationData ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
|
|
ad-type [0] ADType,
|
|
ad-data [1] OCTET STRING
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ad-type
|
|
This field identifies the contents of the ad-data. All negative
|
|
values are reserved for local use. Non-negative values are
|
|
reserved for registered use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ad-data
|
|
This field contains authorization data to be interpreted
|
|
according to the value of the corresponding ad-type field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each sequence of ADType and OCTET STRING is referred to as an
|
|
authorization element. Elements MAY be application specific,
|
|
however, there is a common set of recursive elements that should be
|
|
understood by all implementations. These elements contain other
|
|
AuthorizationData, and the interpretation of the encapsulating
|
|
element determines which enclosed elements must be interpreted, and
|
|
which may be ignored.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depending on the meaning of the encapsulating element, the
|
|
encapsulated AuthorizationData may be ignored, interpreted as issued
|
|
directly by the KDC, or be stored in a separate plaintext part of the
|
|
ticket. The types of the encapsulating elements are specified as
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 34]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
part of the Kerberos protocol because behavior based on these
|
|
container elements should be understood across implementations, while
|
|
other elements need only be understood by the applications which they
|
|
affect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorization data elements are considered critical if present in a
|
|
ticket or authenticator. Unless encapsulated in a known
|
|
authorization data element modifying the criticality of the elements
|
|
it contains, an application server MUST reject the authentication of
|
|
a client whose AP-REQ or ticket contains an unrecognized
|
|
authorization data element. Authorization data is intended to
|
|
restrict the use of a ticket. If the service cannot determine
|
|
whether it is the target of a restriction, a security weakness may
|
|
exist if the ticket can be used for that service. Authorization
|
|
elements that are truly optional can be enclosed in AD-IF-RELEVANT
|
|
element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ad-type | contents of ad-data
|
|
________|_______________________________________
|
|
1 | DER encoding of AD-IF-RELEVANT
|
|
4 | DER encoding of AD-KDCIssued
|
|
5 | DER encoding of AD-AND-OR
|
|
8 | DER encoding of AD-MANDATORY-FOR-KDC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4.1. AD-IF-RELEVANT
|
|
|
|
|
|
ad-if-relevant ADType ::= int32 : 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Encapsulates another AuthorizationData.
|
|
-- Intended for application servers; receiving application servers
|
|
-- MAY ignore.
|
|
AD-IF-RELEVANT ::= AuthorizationData
|
|
|
|
|
|
AD elements encapsulated within the if-relevant element are intended
|
|
for interpretation only by application servers that understand the
|
|
particular ad-type of the embedded element. Application servers that
|
|
do not understand the type of an element embedded within the if-
|
|
relevant element MAY ignore the uninterpretable element. This element
|
|
promotes interoperability across implementations which may have local
|
|
extensions for authorization. The ad-type for AD-IF-RELEVANT is (1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4.2. AD-KDCIssued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 35]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- KDC-issued privilege attributes
|
|
ad-kdcissued ADType ::= int32 : 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
AD-KDCIssued ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
ad-checksum [0] ChecksumOf {
|
|
AuthorizationData, { key-session },
|
|
{ ku-ad-KDCIssued-cksum }},
|
|
i-realm [1] Realm OPTIONAL,
|
|
i-sname [2] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
|
|
elements [3] AuthorizationData
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ad-checksum
|
|
A cryptographic checksum computed over the DER encoding of the
|
|
AuthorizationData in the "elements" field, keyed with the
|
|
session key. Its checksumtype is the mandatory checksum type
|
|
for the encryption type of the session key, and its key usage
|
|
value is 19.
|
|
|
|
|
|
i-realm, i-sname
|
|
The name of the issuing principal if different from the KDC
|
|
itself. This field would be used when the KDC can verify the
|
|
authenticity of elements signed by the issuing principal and it
|
|
allows this KDC to notify the application server of the validity
|
|
of those elements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
elements
|
|
AuthorizationData issued by the KDC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The KDC-issued ad-data field is intended to provide a means for
|
|
Kerberos credentials to embed within themselves privilege attributes
|
|
and other mechanisms for positive authorization, amplifying the
|
|
privileges of the principal beyond what it would have if using
|
|
credentials without such an authorization-data element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This amplification of privileges cannot be provided without this
|
|
element because the definition of the authorization-data field allows
|
|
elements to be added at will by the bearer of a TGT at the time that
|
|
they request service tickets and elements may also be added to a
|
|
delegated ticket by inclusion in the authenticator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For KDC-issued elements this is prevented because the elements are
|
|
signed by the KDC by including a checksum encrypted using the
|
|
server's key (the same key used to encrypt the ticket -- or a key
|
|
derived from that key). AuthorizationData encapsulated with in the
|
|
AD-KDCIssued element MUST be ignored by the application server if
|
|
this "signature" is not present. Further, AuthorizationData
|
|
encapsulated within this element from a ticket-granting ticket MAY be
|
|
interpreted by the KDC, and used as a basis according to policy for
|
|
including new signed elements within derivative tickets, but they
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 36]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
will not be copied to a derivative ticket directly. If they are
|
|
copied directly to a derivative ticket by a KDC that is not aware of
|
|
this element, the signature will not be correct for the application
|
|
ticket elements, and the field will be ignored by the application
|
|
server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This element and the elements it encapsulates MAY be safely ignored
|
|
by applications, application servers, and KDCs that do not implement
|
|
this element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ad-type for AD-KDC-ISSUED is (4).
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4.3. AD-AND-OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
ad-and-or ADType ::= int32 : 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
AD-AND-OR ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
condition-count [0] INTEGER,
|
|
elements [1] AuthorizationData
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When restrictive AD elements are encapsulated within the and-or
|
|
element, the and-or element is considered satisfied if and only if at
|
|
least the number of encapsulated elements specified in condition-
|
|
count are satisfied. Therefore, this element MAY be used to
|
|
implement an "or" operation by setting the condition-count field to
|
|
1, and it MAY specify an "and" operation by setting the condition
|
|
count to the number of embedded elements. Application servers that do
|
|
not implement this element MUST reject tickets that contain
|
|
authorization data elements of this type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ad-type for AD-AND-OR is (5).
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4.4. AD-MANDATORY-FOR-KDC
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- KDCs MUST interpret any AuthorizationData wrapped in this.
|
|
ad-mandatory-for-kdc ADType ::= int32 : 8
|
|
AD-MANDATORY-FOR-KDC ::= AuthorizationData
|
|
|
|
|
|
AD elements encapsulated within the mandatory-for-kdc element are to
|
|
be interpreted by the KDC. KDCs that do not understand the type of
|
|
an element embedded within the mandatory-for-kdc element MUST reject
|
|
the request.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ad-type for AD-MANDATORY-FOR-KDC is (8).
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5. Encrypted Part of Ticket
|
|
|
|
|
|
The complete definition of the encrypted part is
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 37]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Encrypted part of ticket
|
|
EncTicketPart ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 3] EncTicketPart1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 5] EncTicketPartExt
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
with the common portion being
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncTicketPartCommon ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
flags [0] TicketFlags,
|
|
key [1] EncryptionKey,
|
|
crealm [2] Realm,
|
|
cname [3] PrincipalName,
|
|
transited [4] TransitedEncoding,
|
|
authtime [5] KerberosTime,
|
|
starttime [6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
endtime [7] KerberosTime,
|
|
renew-till [8] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
caddr [9] HostAddresses OPTIONAL,
|
|
authorization-data [10] AuthorizationData OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The encrypted part of the backwards-compatibility form of a ticket
|
|
is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncTicketPart1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF EncTicketPartCommon
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
-- explicitly force IA5 in strings
|
|
crealm (RealmIA5),
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameIA5)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
The encrypted part of the extensible form of a ticket is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncTicketPartExt ::= EncTicketPartCommon (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
-- explicitly force UTF-8 in strings
|
|
crealm (RealmExt),
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameExt),
|
|
-- explicitly constrain caddr to be non-empty if present
|
|
caddr (SIZE (1..MAX)),
|
|
-- forbid empty authorization-data encodings
|
|
authorization-data (SIZE (1..MAX))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 38]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.6. Cleartext Part of Ticket
|
|
|
|
|
|
The complete definition of Ticket is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ticket ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 1] Ticket1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 4] Signed {
|
|
TicketExt, { key-server }, { ku-Ticket-cksum }
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
with the common portion being:
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- takes a parameter specifying which type gets encrypted
|
|
TicketCommon { EncPart } ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
tkt-vno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
realm [1] Realm,
|
|
sname [2] PrincipalName,
|
|
enc-part [3] EncryptedData {
|
|
EncPart, { key-server }, { ku-Ticket }
|
|
},
|
|
...,
|
|
extensions [4] TicketExtensions OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "sname" field provides the name of the target service principal
|
|
in cleartext, as a hint to aid the server in choosing the correct
|
|
decryption key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The backwards-compatibility form of Ticket is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ticket1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF TicketCommon { EncTicketPart1510 }
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
-- explicitly force IA5 in strings
|
|
realm (RealmIA5),
|
|
sname (PrincipalNameIA5)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
The extensible form of Ticket is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 39]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- APPLICATION tag goes inside Signed{} as well as outside,
|
|
-- to prevent possible substitution attacks.
|
|
TicketExt ::= [APPLICATION 4] TicketCommon {
|
|
EncTicketPartExt
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
-- explicitly force UTF-8 in strings
|
|
realm (RealmExt),
|
|
sname (PrincipalNameExt)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TicketExtensions, which may only be present in the extensible form of
|
|
Ticket, are a cleartext typed hole for extension use.
|
|
AuthorizationData already provides an encrypted typed hole.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEType ::= TH-id
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- ticket extensions: for TicketExt only
|
|
TicketExtensions ::= SEQUENCE (SIZE (1..MAX)) OF SEQUENCE {
|
|
te-type [0] TEType,
|
|
te-data [1] OCTET STRING
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A client will only receive an extensible Ticket if the application
|
|
server supports extensibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Credential Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two exchanges that can be used for acquiring credentials:
|
|
the AS exchange and the TGS exchange. These exchanges have many
|
|
similarities, and this document describes them in parallel, noting
|
|
which behaviors are specific to one type of exchange. The AS request
|
|
(AS-REQ) and TGS request (TGS-REQ) are both forms of KDC requests
|
|
(KDC-REQ). Likewise, the AS reply (AS-REP) and TGS reply (TGS-REP)
|
|
are forms of KDC replies (KDC-REP).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The credentials acquisition protocol operates over specific
|
|
transports. Additionally, specific methods exist to permit a client
|
|
to discover the KDC host with which to communicate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1. KDC-REQ
|
|
|
|
|
|
The KDC-REQ has a large number of fields in common between the RFC
|
|
1510 and the extensible versions. The KDC-REQ type itself is never
|
|
directly encoded; it is always a part of a AS-REQ or a TGS-REQ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 40]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REQ-COMMON ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
-- NOTE: first tag is [1], not [0]
|
|
pvno [1] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [2] INTEGER (10 -- AS-REQ.rfc1510 --
|
|
| 12 -- TGS-REQ.rfc1510 --
|
|
| 6 -- AS-REQ.ext --
|
|
| 8 -- TGS-REQ.ext -- ),
|
|
padata [3] SEQUENCE OF PA-DATA OPTIONAL
|
|
-- NOTE: not empty
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REQ-BODY-COMMON ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
kdc-options [0] KDCOptions,
|
|
cname [1] PrincipalName OPTIONAL
|
|
-- Used only in AS-REQ --,
|
|
|
|
|
|
realm [2] Realm
|
|
-- Server's realm; also client's in AS-REQ --,
|
|
|
|
|
|
sname [3] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
|
|
from [4] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
till [5] KerberosTime OPTIONAL
|
|
-- was required in rfc1510;
|
|
-- still required for compat versions
|
|
-- of messages --,
|
|
|
|
|
|
rtime [6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
nonce [7] Nonce,
|
|
etype [8] SEQUENCE OF EType
|
|
-- in preference order --,
|
|
|
|
|
|
addresses [9] HostAddresses OPTIONAL,
|
|
enc-authorization-data [10] EncryptedData {
|
|
AuthorizationData, { key-session | key-subsession },
|
|
{ ku-TGSReqAuthData-subkey |
|
|
ku-TGSReqAuthData-sesskey }
|
|
} OPTIONAL,
|
|
|
|
|
|
additional-tickets [11] SEQUENCE OF Ticket OPTIONAL
|
|
-- NOTE: not empty --,
|
|
...
|
|
lang-tags [5] SEQUENCE (SIZE (1..MAX)) OF
|
|
LangTag OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many fields of KDC-REQ-BODY-COMMON correspond directly to fields of
|
|
an EncTicketPartCommon. The KDC copies most of them unchanged,
|
|
provided that the requested values meet site policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 41]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
kdc-options
|
|
These flags do not correspond directly to "flags" in
|
|
EncTicketPartCommon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
cname
|
|
This field is copied to the "cname" field in
|
|
EncTicketPartCommon. The "cname" field is required in an AS-
|
|
REQ; the client places its own name here. In a TGS-REQ, the
|
|
"cname" in the ticket in the AP-REQ takes precedence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
realm
|
|
This field is the server's realm, and also holds the client's
|
|
realm in an AS-REQ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sname
|
|
The "sname" field indicates the server's name. It may be absent
|
|
in a TGS-REQ which requests user-to-user authentication, in
|
|
which case the "sname" of the issued ticket will be taken from
|
|
the included additional ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "from", "till", and "rtime" fields correspond to the "starttime",
|
|
"endtime", and "renew-till" fields of EncTicketPartCommon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
addresses
|
|
This field corresponds to the "caddr" field of
|
|
EncTicketPartCommon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
enc-authorization-data
|
|
For TGS-REQ, this field contains authorization data encrypted
|
|
using either the TGT session key or the AP-REQ subsession key;
|
|
the KDC may copy these into the "authorization-data" field of
|
|
EncTicketPartCommon if policy permits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lang-tags
|
|
Only present in the extensible messages. Specifies the set of
|
|
languages which the client is willing to accept in error
|
|
messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC options used in a KDC-REQ are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 42]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDCOptions ::= KerberosFlags { KDCOptionsBits }
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDCOptionsBits ::= BIT STRING {
|
|
reserved (0),
|
|
forwardable (1),
|
|
forwarded (2),
|
|
proxiable (3),
|
|
proxy (4),
|
|
allow-postdate (5),
|
|
postdated (6),
|
|
unused7 (7),
|
|
renewable (8),
|
|
unused9 (9),
|
|
unused10 (10),
|
|
unused11 (11),
|
|
unused12 (12),
|
|
unused13 (13),
|
|
requestanonymous (14),
|
|
canonicalize (15),
|
|
disable-transited-check (26),
|
|
renewable-ok (27),
|
|
enc-tkt-in-skey (28),
|
|
renew (30),
|
|
validate (31)
|
|
-- XXX need "need ticket1" flag?
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Different options apply to different phases of KDC-REQ processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The backwards-compatibility form of a KDC-REQ is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REQ-1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF KDC-REQ-COMMON,
|
|
req-body [4] KDC-REQ-BODY-1510
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (10 | 12) })
|
|
|
|
|
|
The extensible form of a KDC-REQ is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- APPLICATION tag goes inside Signed{} as well as outside,
|
|
-- to prevent possible substitution attacks.
|
|
KDC-REQ-EXT ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF KDC-REQ-COMMON,
|
|
req-body [4] KDC-REQ-BODY-EXT,
|
|
...
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (6 | 8),
|
|
padata (SIZE (1..MAX))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
The backwards-compatibility form of a KDC-REQ-BODY is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 43]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REQ-BODY-1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF KDC-REQ-BODY-COMMON
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameIA5),
|
|
realm (RealmIA5),
|
|
sname (PrincipalNameIA5),
|
|
till PRESENT,
|
|
nonce (UInt32)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
The extensible form of a KDC-REQ-BODY is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REQ-BODY-EXT ::= KDC-REQ-BODY-COMMON
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameExt),
|
|
realm (RealmExt),
|
|
sname (PrincipalNameExt),
|
|
addresses (SIZE (1..MAX)),
|
|
enc-authorization-data (EncryptedData {
|
|
AuthorizationData (SIZE (1..MAX)),
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession },
|
|
{ ku-TGSReqAuthData-subkey |
|
|
ku-TGSReqAuthData-sesskey }
|
|
}),
|
|
additional-tickets (SIZE (1..MAX))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
The AS-REQ is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 44]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS-REQ ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 10] KDC-REQ-1510
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (10),
|
|
-- AS-REQ must include client name
|
|
req-body (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., cname PRESENT })
|
|
}),
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 6] Signed {
|
|
-- APPLICATION tag goes inside Signed{} as well as
|
|
-- outside, to prevent possible substitution attacks.
|
|
[APPLICATION 6] KDC-REQ-EXT,
|
|
-- not sure this is correct key to use; do we even want
|
|
-- to sign AS-REQ?
|
|
{ key-client },
|
|
{ ku-ASReq-cksum }
|
|
}
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (6),
|
|
-- AS-REQ must include client name
|
|
req-body (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., cname PRESENT })
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
A client SHOULD NOT send the extensible AS-REQ alternative to a KDC
|
|
if the client does not know that the KDC supports the extensibility
|
|
framework. A client SHOULD send the extensible AS-REQ alternative in
|
|
a PA-AS-REQ PA-DATA. A KDC supporting extensibility will treat the
|
|
AS-REQ contained within the PA-AS-REQ as the actual AS-REQ. [ XXX
|
|
what if their contents conflict? ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
The TGS-REQ is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 45]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
TGS-REQ ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 12] KDC-REQ-1510
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (12),
|
|
-- client name optional in TGS-REQ
|
|
req-body (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., cname ABSENT })
|
|
}),
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 8] Signed {
|
|
-- APPLICATION tag goes inside Signed{} as well as
|
|
-- outside, to prevent possible substitution attacks.
|
|
[APPLICATION 8] KDC-REQ-EXT,
|
|
{ key-session }, { ku-TGSReq-cksum }
|
|
}
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (8),
|
|
-- client name optional in TGS-REQ
|
|
req-body (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., cname ABSENT })
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.2. PA-DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
PA-DATA have multiple uses in the Kerberos protocol. They may pre-
|
|
authenticate an AS-REQ; they may also modify several of the
|
|
encryption keys used in a KDC-REP. PA-DATA may also provide "hints"
|
|
to the client about which long-term key (usually password-derived) to
|
|
use. PA-DATA may also include "hints" about which pre-authentication
|
|
mechanisms to use, or include data for input into a pre-
|
|
authentication mechanism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ XXX enumerate standard padata here ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3. KDC-REQ Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing of a KDC-REQ proceeds through several steps. An
|
|
implementation need not perform these steps exactly as described, as
|
|
long as it behaves as if the steps were performed as described. The
|
|
KDC performs replay handling upon receiving the request; it then
|
|
validates the request, adjusts timestamps, and selects the keys used
|
|
in the reply. It copies data from the request into the issued
|
|
ticket, adjusting the values to conform with its policies. The KDC
|
|
then transmits the reply to the client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.1. Handling Replays
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because Kerberos can run over unreliable transports such as UDP, the
|
|
KDC MUST be prepared to retransmit responses in case they are lost.
|
|
If a KDC receives a request identical to one it has recently
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 46]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
successfully processed, the KDC MUST respond with a KDC-REP message
|
|
rather than a replay error. In order to reduce the amount of
|
|
ciphertext given to a potential attacker, KDCs MAY send the same
|
|
response generated when the request was first handled. KDCs MUST
|
|
obey this replay behavior even if the actual transport in use is
|
|
reliable. If the AP-REQ which authenticates a TGS-REQ is a replay,
|
|
and the entire request is not identical to a recently successfully
|
|
processed request, the KDC SHOULD return "krb-ap-err-repeat", as is
|
|
appropriate for AP-REQ processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.2. Request Validation
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.2.1. AS-REQ Authentication
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site policy determines whether a given client principal is required
|
|
to provide some pre-authentication prior to receiving an AS-REP.
|
|
Since the default reply key is typically the client's long-term
|
|
password-based key, an attacker may easily request known plaintext
|
|
(in the form of an AS-REP) upon which to mount a dictionary attack.
|
|
Pre-authentication can limit the possibility of such an attack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If site policy requires pre-authentication for a client principal,
|
|
and no pre-authentication is provided, the KDC returns the error
|
|
"kdc-err-preauth-required". Accompanying this error are "e-data"
|
|
which include hints telling the client which pre-authentication
|
|
mechanisms to use, or data for input to pre-authentication mechanisms
|
|
(e.g., input to challenge-response systems). If pre-authentication
|
|
fails, the KDC returns the error "kdc-err-preauth-failed".
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ may need additional changes based on Sam's preauth draft ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.2.2. TGS-REQ Authentication
|
|
|
|
|
|
A TGS-REQ has an accompanying AP-REQ, which is included in the "pa-
|
|
tgs-req". The KDC MUST validate the checksum in the Authenticator of
|
|
the AP-REQ, which is computed over the KDC-REQ-BODY-1510 or KDC-REQ-
|
|
BODY-EXT (for TGS-REQ-1510 or TGS-REQ-EXT, respectively) of the
|
|
request. [ padata not signed by authenticator! ] Any error from the
|
|
AP-REQ validation process SHOULD be returned in a KRB-ERROR message.
|
|
The service principal in the ticket of the AP-REQ may be a ticket-
|
|
granting service principal, or a normal application service
|
|
principal. A ticket which is not a ticket-granting ticket MUST NOT
|
|
be used to issue a ticket for any service other than the one named in
|
|
the ticket. In this case, the "renew", "validate", or "proxy" [?also
|
|
forwarded?] option must be set in the request.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.2.3. Principal Validation
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the client principal in an AS-REQ is unknown, the KDC returns the
|
|
error "kdc-err-c-principal-unknown". If the server principal in a
|
|
KDC-REQ is unknown, the KDC returns the error "kdc-err-s-principal-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 47]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
unknown".
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.2.4. Checking For Revoked or Invalid Tickets
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ KCLAR 3.3.3.1 ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whenever a request is made to the ticket-granting server, the
|
|
presented ticket(s) is(are) checked against a hot-list of tickets
|
|
which have been canceled. This hot-list might be implemented by
|
|
storing a range of issue timestamps for "suspect tickets"; if a
|
|
presented ticket had an authtime in that range, it would be rejected.
|
|
In this way, a stolen ticket-granting ticket or renewable ticket
|
|
cannot be used to gain additional tickets (renewals or otherwise)
|
|
once the theft has been reported to the KDC for the realm in which
|
|
the server resides. Any normal ticket obtained before it was
|
|
reported stolen will still be valid (because they require no
|
|
interaction with the KDC), but only until their normal expiration
|
|
time. If TGTs have been issued for cross-realm authentication, use
|
|
of the cross-realm TGT will not be affected unless the hot-list is
|
|
propagated to the KDCs for the realms for which such cross-realm
|
|
tickets were issued.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a TGS-REQ ticket has its "invalid" flag set, the KDC MUST NOT
|
|
issue any ticket unless the TGS-REQ requests the "validate" option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.3. Timestamp Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ some aspects of timestamp handling, especially regarding postdating
|
|
and renewal, are difficult to read in KCLAR... needs closer
|
|
examination here ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing of "starttime" (requested in the "from" field) differs
|
|
depending on whether the "postdated" option is set in the request.
|
|
If the "postdated" option is not set, and the requested "starttime"
|
|
is in the future beyond the window of acceptable clock skew, the KDC
|
|
returns the error "kdc-err-cannot-postdate". If the "postdated"
|
|
option is not set, and the requested "starttime" is absent or does
|
|
not indicate a time in the future beyond the acceptable clock skew,
|
|
the KDC sets the "starttime" to the KDC's current time. The
|
|
"postdated" option MUST NOT be honored if the ticket is being
|
|
requested by TGS-REQ and the "may-postdate" is not set in the TGT.
|
|
Otherwise, if the "postdated" option is set, and site policy permits,
|
|
the KDC sets the "starttime" as requested, and sets the "invalid"
|
|
flag in the new ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "till" field is required in the RFC 1510 version of the KDC-REQ.
|
|
If the "till" field is equal to "19700101000000Z" (midnight, January
|
|
1, 1970), the KDC SHOULD behave as if the "till" field were absent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The KDC MUST NOT issue a ticket whose "starttime", "endtime", or
|
|
"renew-till" time is later than the "renew-till" time of the ticket
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 48]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
from which it is derived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.3.1. AS-REQ Timestamp Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the AS exchange, the "authtime" of a ticket is set to the local
|
|
time at the KDC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "endtime" of the ticket will be set to the earlier of the
|
|
requested "till" time and a time determined by local policy, possibly
|
|
determined using factors specific to the realm or principal. For
|
|
example, the expiration time MAY be set to the earliest of the
|
|
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the expiration time ("till" value) requested
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the ticket's start time plus the maximum allowable lifetime
|
|
associated with the client principal from the authentication
|
|
server's database
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the ticket's start time plus the maximum allowable lifetime
|
|
associated with the server principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the ticket's start time plus the maximum lifetime set by the
|
|
policy of the local realm
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the requested expiration time minus the start time (as determined
|
|
above) is less than a site-determined minimum lifetime, an error
|
|
message with code "kdc-err-never-valid" is returned. If the
|
|
requested expiration time for the ticket exceeds what was determined
|
|
as above, and if the "renewable-ok" option was requested, then the
|
|
"renewable" flag is set in the new ticket, and the "renew-till" value
|
|
is set as if the "renewable" option were requested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the "renewable" option has been requested or if the "renewable-ok"
|
|
option has been set and a renewable ticket is to be issued, then the
|
|
"renew-till" field MAY be set to the earliest of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
* its requested value
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the start time of the ticket plus the minimum of the two maximum
|
|
renewable lifetimes associated with the principals' database
|
|
entries
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the start time of the ticket plus the maximum renewable lifetime
|
|
set by the policy of the local realm
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.3.2. TGS-REQ Timestamp Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the TGS exchange, the KDC sets the "authtime" to that of the
|
|
ticket in the AP-REQ authenticating the TGS-REQ. [?application
|
|
server can print a ticket for itself with a spoofed authtime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 49]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
security issues for hot-list?] [ MIT implementation may change
|
|
authtime of renewed tickets; needs check... ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the TGS-REQ has a TGT as the ticket in its AP-REQ, and the TGS-REQ
|
|
requests an "endtime" (in the "till" field), then the "endtime" of
|
|
the new ticket is set to the minimum of
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the requested "endtime" value,
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the "endtime" in the TGT, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
* an "endtime" determined by site policy on ticket lifetimes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the new ticket is a renewal, the "endtime" of the new ticket is
|
|
bounded by the minimum of
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the requested "endtime" value,
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the value of the "renew-till" value of the old,
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the "starttime" of the new ticket plus the lifetime (endtime
|
|
minus starttime) of the old ticket, i.e., the lifetime of the
|
|
new ticket may not exceed that of the ticket being renewed [
|
|
adapted from KCLAR 3.3.3. ], and
|
|
|
|
|
|
* an "endtime" determined by site policy on ticket lifetimes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When handling a TGS-REQ, a KDC MUST NOT issue a postdated ticket with
|
|
a "starttime", "endtime", or "renew-till" time later than the
|
|
"renew-till" time of the TGT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.4. Handling Transited Realms
|
|
|
|
|
|
The KDC checks the ticket in a TGS-REQ against site policy, unless
|
|
the "disable-transited-check" option is set in the TGS-REQ. If site
|
|
policy permits the transit path in the TGS-REQ ticket, the KDC sets
|
|
the "transited-policy-checked" flag in the issued ticket. If the
|
|
"disable-transited-check" option is set, the issued ticket will have
|
|
the "transited-policy-checked" flag cleared.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.5. Address Processing The requested "addresses" in the KDC-REQ are
|
|
copied into the issued ticket. If the "addresses" field is absent or
|
|
empty in a TGS-REQ, the KDC copies addresses from the ticket in the
|
|
TGS-REQ into the issued ticket, unless the either "forwarded" or
|
|
"proxy" option is set. If the "forwarded" option is set, and the
|
|
ticket in the TGS-REQ has its "forwardable" flag set, the KDC copies
|
|
the addresses from the TGS-REQ, not the from TGS-REQ ticket, into the
|
|
issued ticket. The KDC behaves similarly if the "proxy" option is
|
|
set in the TGS-REQ and the "proxiable" flag is set in the ticket.
|
|
The "proxy" option will not be honored on requests for additional
|
|
ticket-granting tickets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 50]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.6. Ticket Flag Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many kdc-options request that the KDC set a corresponding flag in the
|
|
issued ticket. kdc-options marked with an asterisk (*) in the
|
|
following table do not directly request the corresponding ticket flag
|
|
and therefore require special handling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kdc-option | ticket flag affected
|
|
________________________|__________________________
|
|
forwardable | forwardable
|
|
forwarded | forwarded
|
|
proxiable | proxiable
|
|
proxy | proxy
|
|
allow-postdate | may-postdate
|
|
postdated | postdated
|
|
renewable | renewable
|
|
requestanonymous | anonymous
|
|
canonicalize | -
|
|
disable-transited-check*| transited-policy-checked
|
|
renewable-ok* | renewable
|
|
enc-tkt-in-skey | -
|
|
renew | -
|
|
validate* | invalid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
forwarded
|
|
The KDC sets the "forwarded" flag in the issued ticket if the
|
|
"forwarded" option is set in the TGS-REQ and the "forwardable"
|
|
flag is set in the TGS-REQ ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
proxy
|
|
The KDC sets the "proxy" flag in the issued ticket if the
|
|
"proxy" option is set in the TGS-REQ and the "proxiable" flag is
|
|
set in the TGS-REQ ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
disable-transited-check
|
|
The handling of the "disable-transited-check" kdc-option is
|
|
described in Section 8.3.4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
renewable-ok
|
|
The handling of the "renewable-ok" kdc-option is described in
|
|
Section 8.3.3.1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
enc-tkt-in-skey
|
|
This flag modifies ticket key selection to use the session key
|
|
of an additional ticket included in the TGS-REQ, for the purpose
|
|
of user-to-user authentication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 51]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
validate
|
|
If the "validate" kdc-option is set in a TGS-REQ, and the
|
|
"starttime" has passed, the KDC will clear the "invalid" bit on
|
|
the ticket before re-issuing it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.7. Key Selection
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three keys are involved in creating a KDC-REP. The reply key
|
|
encrypts the encrypted part of the KDC-REP. The session key is
|
|
stored in the encrypted part of the ticket, and is also present in
|
|
the encrypted part of the KDC-REP so that the client can retrieve it.
|
|
The ticket key is used to encrypt the ticket. These keys all have
|
|
initial values for a given exchange; pre-authentication and other
|
|
extension mechanisms may change the value used for any of these keys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ again, may need changes based on Sam's preauth draft ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.7.1. Reply Key and Session Key Selection
|
|
|
|
|
|
The set of encryption types which the client will understand appears
|
|
in the "etype" field of KDC-REQ-BODY-COMMON. The KDC limits the set
|
|
of possible reply keys and the set of session key encryption types
|
|
based on the "etype" field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the AS exchange, the reply key is initially a long-term key of
|
|
the client, limited to those encryption types listed in the "etype"
|
|
field. The KDC SHOULD use the first valid strong "etype" for which
|
|
an encryption key is available. For the TGS exchange, the reply key
|
|
is initially the subsession key of the Authenticator. If the
|
|
Authenticator subsesion key is absent, the reply key is initially the
|
|
session key of the ticket used to authenticate the TGS-REQ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The session key is initially randomly generated, and has an
|
|
encryption type which both the client and the server will understand.
|
|
Typically, the KDC has prior knowledge of which encryption types the
|
|
server will understand. It selects the first valid strong "etype"
|
|
listed the request which the server also will understand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.7.2. Ticket Key Selection
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ticket key is initially the long-term key of the service. The
|
|
"enc-tkt-in-skey" option requests user-to-user authentication, where
|
|
the ticket encryption key of the issued ticket is set equal to the
|
|
session key of the additional ticket in the request.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4. KDC-REP
|
|
|
|
|
|
The important parts of the KDC-REP are encrypted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 52]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncASRepPart1510 ::= [APPLICATION 25] EncKDCRepPart1510
|
|
EncTGSRepPart1510 ::= [APPLICATION 26] EncKDCRepPart1510
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncASRepPartExt ::= [APPLICATION 32] EncKDCRepPartExt
|
|
EncTGSRepPartExt ::= [APPLICATION 33] EncKDCRepPartExt
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncKDCRepPartCom ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
key [0] EncryptionKey,
|
|
last-req [1] LastReq,
|
|
nonce [2] Nonce,
|
|
key-expiration [3] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
flags [4] TicketFlags,
|
|
authtime [5] KerberosTime,
|
|
starttime [6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
endtime [7] KerberosTime,
|
|
renew-till [8] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
srealm [9] Realm,
|
|
sname [10] PrincipalName,
|
|
caddr [11] HostAddresses OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncKDCRepPart1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF EncKDCRepPartCom
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
srealm (RealmIA5),
|
|
sname (PrincipalNameIA5),
|
|
nonce UInt32 })
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncKdcRepPartExt ::= EncKDCRepPartCom (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
srealm (RealmExt),
|
|
sname (PrincipalNameExt)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most of the fields of EncKDCRepPartCom are duplicates of the
|
|
corresponding fields in the returned ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 53]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REP-COMMON { EncPart } ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (11 -- AS-REP.rfc1510 -- |
|
|
13 -- TGS.rfc1510 -- |
|
|
7 -- AS-REP.ext -- |
|
|
9 -- TGS-REP.ext -- ),
|
|
padata [2] SEQUENCE OF PA-DATA OPTIONAL,
|
|
crealm [3] Realm,
|
|
cname [4] PrincipalName,
|
|
ticket [5] Ticket,
|
|
|
|
|
|
enc-part [6] EncryptedData {
|
|
EncPart,
|
|
{ key-reply },
|
|
-- maybe reach into EncryptedData in AS-REP/TGS-REP
|
|
-- definitions to apply constraints on key usages?
|
|
{ ku-EncASRepPart -- if AS-REP -- |
|
|
ku-EncTGSRepPart-subkey -- if TGS-REP and
|
|
-- using Authenticator
|
|
-- session key -- |
|
|
ku-EncTGSRepPart-sesskey -- if TGS-REP and using
|
|
-- subsession key -- }
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
...,
|
|
-- In extensible version, KDC signs original request
|
|
-- to avoid replay attacks against client.
|
|
req-cksum [7] ChecksumOf { CHOICE {
|
|
as-req AS-REQ,
|
|
tgs-req TGS-REQ
|
|
}, { key-reply }, { ku-KDCRep-cksum }} OPTIONAL,
|
|
lang-tag [8] LangTag OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REP-1510 { EncPart } ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF KDC-REP-COMMON { EncPart }
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (11 | 13),
|
|
crealm (RealmIA5),
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameIA5)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 54]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REP-EXT { EncPart } ::= KDC-REP-COMMON { EncPart }
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (7 | 9),
|
|
crealm (RealmExt),
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameExt)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
req-cksum
|
|
Signature of the original request using the reply key, to avoid
|
|
replay attacks against the client, among other things. Only
|
|
present in the extensible version of KDC-REP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS-REP ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 11] KDC-REP-1510 {
|
|
EncASRepPart1510
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (11) }),
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 7] Signed {
|
|
[APPLICATION 7] KDC-REP-EXT { EncASRepPartExt },
|
|
{ key-reply }, { ku-ASRep-cksum }
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (7) })
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TGS-REP ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 13] KDC-REP-1510 {
|
|
EncTGSRepPart1510
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (13) }),
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 9] Signed {
|
|
[APPLICATION 9] KDC-REP-EXT { EncTGSRepPartExt },
|
|
{ key-reply }, { ku-TGSRep-cksum }
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (9) })
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The extensible versions of AS-REQ and TGS-REQ are signed with the
|
|
reply key, to prevent an attacker from performing a delayed denial-
|
|
of-service attack by substituting the ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5. Reply Validation
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ signature verification ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6. IP Transports
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ KCLAR 7.2 ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerberos defines two IP transport mechanisms for the credentials
|
|
acquisition protocol: UDP/IP and TCP/IP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 55]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6.1. UDP/IP transport
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerberos servers (KDCs) supporting IP transports MUST accept UDP
|
|
requests and SHOULD listen for such requests on port 88 (decimal)
|
|
unless specifically configured to listen on an alternative UDP port.
|
|
Alternate ports MAY be used when running multiple KDCs for multiple
|
|
realms on the same host.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerberos clients supporting IP transports SHOULD support the sending
|
|
of UDP requests. Clients SHOULD use KDC discovery (Section 8.6.3) to
|
|
identify the IP address and port to which they will send their
|
|
request.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When contacting a KDC for a KRB_KDC_REQ request using UDP/IP
|
|
transport, the client shall send a UDP datagram containing only an
|
|
encoding of the request to the KDC. The KDC will respond with a reply
|
|
datagram containing only an encoding of the reply message (either a
|
|
KRB-ERROR or a KDC-REP) to the sending port at the sender's IP
|
|
address. The response to a request made through UDP/IP transport MUST
|
|
also use UDP/IP transport. If the response can not be handled using
|
|
UDP (for example because it is too large), the KDC MUST return "krb-
|
|
err-response-too-big", forcing the client to retry the request using
|
|
the TCP transport.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6.2. TCP/IP transport
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerberos servers (KDCs) supporting IP transports MUST accept TCP
|
|
requests and SHOULD listen for such requests on port 88 (decimal)
|
|
unless specifically configured to listen on an alternate TCP port.
|
|
Alternate ports MAY be used when running multiple KDCs for multiple
|
|
realms on the same host.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients MUST support the sending of TCP requests, but MAY choose to
|
|
initially try a request using the UDP transport. Clients SHOULD use
|
|
KDC discovery (Section 8.6.3) to identify the IP address and port to
|
|
which they will send their request.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation note: Some extensions to the Kerberos protocol will
|
|
not succeed if any client or KDC not supporting the TCP transport is
|
|
involved. Implementations of RFC 1510 were not required to support
|
|
TCP/IP transports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the KDC-REQ message is sent to the KDC over a TCP stream, the
|
|
response (KDC-REP or KRB-ERROR message) MUST be returned to the
|
|
client on the same TCP stream that was established for the request.
|
|
The KDC MAY close the TCP stream after sending a response, but MAY
|
|
leave the stream open for a reasonable period of time if it expects a
|
|
followup. Care must be taken in managing TCP/IP connections on the
|
|
KDC to prevent denial of service attacks based on the number of open
|
|
TCP/IP connections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 56]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
The client MUST be prepared to have the stream closed by the KDC at
|
|
anytime after the receipt of a response. A stream closure SHOULD NOT
|
|
be treated as a fatal error. Instead, if multiple exchanges are
|
|
required (e.g., certain forms of pre-authentication) the client may
|
|
need to establish a new connection when it is ready to send
|
|
subsequent messages. A client MAY close the stream after receiving a
|
|
response, and SHOULD close the stream if it does not expect to send
|
|
followup messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A client MAY send multiple requests before receiving responses,
|
|
though it must be prepared to handle the connection being closed
|
|
after the first response.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each request (KDC-REQ) and response (KDC-REP or KRB-ERROR) sent over
|
|
the TCP stream is preceded by the length of the request as 4 octets
|
|
in network byte order. The high bit of the length is reserved for
|
|
future expansion and MUST currently be set to zero. If a KDC that
|
|
does not understand how to interpret a set high bit of the length
|
|
encoding receives a request with the high order bit of the length
|
|
set, it MUST return a KRB-ERROR message with the error "krb-err-
|
|
field-toolong" and MUST close the TCP stream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If multiple requests are sent over a single TCP connection, and the
|
|
KDC sends multiple responses, the KDC is not required to send the
|
|
responses in the order of the corresponding requests. This may
|
|
permit some implementations to send each response as soon as it is
|
|
ready even if earlier requests are still being processed (for
|
|
example, waiting for a response from an external device or database).
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6.3. KDC Discovery on IP Networks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerberos client implementations MUST provide a means for the client
|
|
to determine the location of the Kerberos Key Distribution Centers
|
|
(KDCs). Traditionally, Kerberos implementations have stored such
|
|
configuration information in a file on each client machine.
|
|
Experience has shown this method of storing configuration information
|
|
presents problems with out-of-date information and scaling problems,
|
|
especially when using cross-realm authentication. This section
|
|
describes a method for using the Domain Name System [RFC 1035] for
|
|
storing KDC location information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6.3.1. DNS vs. Kerberos - Case Sensitivity of Realm Names
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Kerberos, realm names are case sensitive. While it is strongly
|
|
encouraged that all realm names be all upper case this recommendation
|
|
has not been adopted by all sites. Some sites use all lower case
|
|
names and other use mixed case. DNS, on the other hand, is case
|
|
insensitive for queries. Since the realm names "MYREALM", "myrealm",
|
|
and "MyRealm" are all different, but resolve the same in the domain
|
|
name system, it is necessary that only one of the possible
|
|
combinations of upper and lower case characters be used in realm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 57]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
names.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6.3.2. DNS SRV records for KDC location
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC location information is to be stored using the DNS SRV RR [RFC
|
|
2782]. The format of this RR is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
_Service._Proto.Realm TTL Class SRV Priority Weight Port Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Service name for Kerberos is always "kerberos".
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Proto can be one of "udp", "tcp". If these SRV records are to be
|
|
used, both "udp" and "tcp" records MUST be specified for all KDC
|
|
deployments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Realm is the Kerberos realm that this record corresponds to. The
|
|
realm MUST be a domain style realm name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TTL, Class, SRV, Priority, Weight, and Target have the standard
|
|
meaning as defined in RFC 2782.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As per RFC 2782 the Port number used for "_udp" and "_tcp" SRV
|
|
records SHOULD be the value assigned to "kerberos" by the Internet
|
|
Assigned Number Authority: 88 (decimal) unless the KDC is configured
|
|
to listen on an alternate TCP port.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation note: Many existing client implementations do not
|
|
support KDC Discovery and are configured to send requests to the IANA
|
|
assigned port (88 decimal), so it is strongly recommended that KDCs
|
|
be configured to listen on that port.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6.3.3. KDC Discovery for Domain Style Realm Names on IP Networks
|
|
|
|
|
|
These are DNS records for a Kerberos realm EXAMPLE.COM. It has two
|
|
Kerberos servers, kdc1.example.com and kdc2.example.com. Queries
|
|
should be directed to kdc1.example.com first as per the specified
|
|
priority. Weights are not used in these sample records.
|
|
|
|
|
|
_kerberos._udp.EXAMPLE.COM. IN SRV 0 0 88 kdc1.example.com.
|
|
_kerberos._udp.EXAMPLE.COM. IN SRV 1 0 88 kdc2.example.com.
|
|
_kerberos._tcp.EXAMPLE.COM. IN SRV 0 0 88 kdc1.example.com.
|
|
_kerberos._tcp.EXAMPLE.COM. IN SRV 1 0 88 kdc2.example.com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Errors
|
|
|
|
|
|
The KRB-ERROR message is returned by the KDC if an error occurs
|
|
during credentials acquisition. It may also be returned by an
|
|
application server if an error occurs during authentication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 58]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
ErrCode ::= Int32
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-ERROR ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 30] KRB-ERROR-1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 23] Signed {
|
|
KRB-ERROR-EXT, { ku-KrbError-cksum } }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The extensible KRB-ERROR is only signed if there has been a key
|
|
negotiated with its recipient. KRB-ERROR messages sent in response
|
|
to AS-REQ messages will probably not be signed unless a
|
|
preauthentication mechanism has negotiated a key. (Signing using a
|
|
client's long-term key can expose ciphertext to dictionary attacks.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The parts of a KRB-ERROR common to both the backwards-compatibility
|
|
and the extensibile messages are
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-ERROR-COMMON ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (30 | 23),
|
|
ctime [2] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
cusec [3] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
|
|
stime [4] KerberosTime,
|
|
susec [5] Microseconds,
|
|
error-code [6] ErrCode,
|
|
crealm [7] Realm OPTIONAL,
|
|
cname [8] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
|
|
realm [9] Realm -- Correct realm --,
|
|
sname [10] PrincipalName -- Correct name --,
|
|
e-text [11] KerberosString OPTIONAL,
|
|
e-data [12] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL,
|
|
...,
|
|
typed-data [13] TYPED-DATA OPTIONAL,
|
|
nonce [14] Nonce OPTIONAL,
|
|
lang-tag [15] LangTag OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-ERROR-1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF KRB-ERROR-COMMON
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (30)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-ERROR-EXT ::= [APPLICATION 23] KRB-ERROR-COMMON
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (23) })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 59]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
ctime, cusec
|
|
Client's time, if known from a KDC-REQ or AP-REQ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
stime, susec
|
|
KDC or application server's current time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
error-code
|
|
Numeric error code designating the error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
crealm, cname
|
|
Client's realm and name, if known.
|
|
|
|
|
|
realm, sname
|
|
server's realm and name. [ XXX what if these aren't known? ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
e-text
|
|
Human-readable text providing additional details for the error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
e-data
|
|
This field contains additional data about the error for use by
|
|
the client to help it recover from or handle the error. If the
|
|
"error-code" is "kdc-err-preauth-required", then the e-data
|
|
field will contain an encoding of a sequence of padata fields,
|
|
each corresponding to an acceptable pre-authentication method
|
|
and optionally containing data for the method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
METHOD-DATA ::= SEQUENCE OF PA-DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For error codes defined in this document other than "kdc-err-
|
|
preauth-required", the format and contents of the e-data field
|
|
are implementation-defined. Similarly, for future error codes,
|
|
the format and contents of the e-data field are implementation-
|
|
defined unless specified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lang-tag
|
|
Indicates the language of the message in the "e-text" field. It
|
|
is only present in the extensible KRB-ERROR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
nonce
|
|
is the nonce from a KDC-REQ. It is only present in the
|
|
extensible KRB-ERROR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
typed-data
|
|
TYPED-DATA is a typed hole allowing for additional data to be
|
|
returned in error conditions, since "e-data" is insufficiently
|
|
flexible for some purposes. TYPED-DATA is only present in the
|
|
extensible KRB-ERROR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 60]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDType ::= TH-id
|
|
|
|
|
|
TYPED-DATA ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF SEQUENCE {
|
|
data-type [0] TDType,
|
|
data-value [1] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Session Key Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session key exchange consists of the AP-REQ and AP-REP messages. The
|
|
client sends the AP-REQ message, and the service responds with an
|
|
AP-REP message if mutual authentication is desired. Following
|
|
session key exchange, the client and service share a secret session
|
|
key, or possibly a subsesion key, which can be used to protect
|
|
further communications. Additionally, the session key exchange
|
|
process can establish initial sequence numbers which the client and
|
|
service can use to detect replayed messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1. AP-REQ
|
|
|
|
|
|
An AP-REQ message contains a ticket and a authenticator. The
|
|
authenticator is ciphertext encrypted with the session key contained
|
|
in the ticket. The plaintext contents of the authenticator are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- plaintext of authenticator
|
|
Authenticator ::= [APPLICATION 2] SEQUENCE {
|
|
authenticator-vno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
crealm [1] Realm,
|
|
cname [2] PrincipalName,
|
|
cksum [3] Checksum {{ key-session },
|
|
{ ku-Authenticator-cksum |
|
|
ku-pa-TGSReq-cksum }} OPTIONAL,
|
|
cusec [4] Microseconds,
|
|
ctime [5] KerberosTime,
|
|
subkey [6] EncryptionKey OPTIONAL,
|
|
seq-number [7] SeqNum OPTIONAL,
|
|
authorization-data [8] AuthorizationData OPTIONAL
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
The common parts between the RFC 1510 and the extensible versions of
|
|
the AP-REQ are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 61]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REQ-COMMON ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (14 | 18),
|
|
ap-options [2] APOptions,
|
|
ticket [3] Ticket,
|
|
authenticator [4] EncryptedData {
|
|
Authenticator,
|
|
{ key-session },
|
|
{ ku-APReq-authenticator |
|
|
ku-pa-TGSReq-authenticator }
|
|
},
|
|
...,
|
|
extensions [5] ApReqExtensions OPTIONAL,
|
|
lang-tag [6] SEQUENCE (SIZE (1..MAX))
|
|
OF LangTag OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
The complete definition of AP-REQ is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REQ ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 14] AP-REQ-1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 18] Signed {
|
|
AP-REQ-EXT, { key-session }, { ku-APReq-cksum }
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REQ-COMMON ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (14 | 18),
|
|
ap-options [2] APOptions,
|
|
ticket [3] Ticket,
|
|
authenticator [4] EncryptedData {
|
|
Authenticator,
|
|
{ key-session },
|
|
{ ku-APReq-authenticator |
|
|
ku-pa-TGSReq-authenticator }
|
|
},
|
|
...,
|
|
extensions [5] ApReqExtensions OPTIONAL,
|
|
lang-tag [6] SEQUENCE (SIZE (1..MAX))
|
|
OF LangTag OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 62]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REQ-1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF AP-REQ-COMMON
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (14),
|
|
authenticator (EncryptedData {
|
|
Authenticator (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
crealm (RealmIA5),
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameIA5),
|
|
seqnum (UInt32)
|
|
}), { key-session }, { ku-APReq-authenticator }})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REQ-EXT ::= AP-REQ-COMMON
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (18),
|
|
-- The following constraints on Authenticator assume that
|
|
-- we want to restrict the use of AP-REQ-EXT with TicketExt
|
|
-- only, since that is the only way we can enforce UTF-8.
|
|
authenticator (EncryptedData {
|
|
Authenticator (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
crealm (RealmExt),
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameExt),
|
|
authorization-data (SIZE (1..MAX))
|
|
}), { key-session }, { ku-APReq-authenticator }})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APOptions ::= KerberosFlags { APOptionsBits }
|
|
|
|
|
|
APOptionsBits ::= BIT STRING {
|
|
reserved (0),
|
|
use-session-key (1),
|
|
mutual-required (2)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2. AP-REP
|
|
|
|
|
|
An AP-REP message provides mutual authentication of the service to
|
|
the client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncAPRepPart ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 27] EncAPRepPart1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 31] EncAPRepPartExt
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 63]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncAPRepPartCom ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
ctime [0] KerberosTime,
|
|
cusec [1] Microseconds,
|
|
subkey [2] EncryptionKey OPTIONAL,
|
|
seq-number [3] SeqNum OPTIONAL,
|
|
...,
|
|
authorization-data [4] AuthorizationData OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncAPRepPart1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF ENCAPRepPartCom
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
seq-number (UInt32),
|
|
authorization-data ABSENT
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncAPRepPartExt ::= EncAPRepPartCom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REP ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 15] AP-REP-1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 19] Signed {
|
|
AP-REP-EXT,
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession }, { ku-APRep-cksum }}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REP-COMMON { EncPart } ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (15 | 19),
|
|
enc-part [2] EncryptedData {
|
|
EncPart,
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession }, { ku-EncAPRepPart }},
|
|
...,
|
|
extensions [3] ApRepExtensions OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REP-1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF AP-REP-COMMON { EncAPRepPart1510 }
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (15)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 64]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REP-EXT ::= [APPLICATION 19] AP-REP-COMMON {
|
|
EncAPRepPartExt
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (19) })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Session Key Use
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a session key has been established, the client and server can
|
|
use several kinds of messages to securely transmit data. KRB-SAFE
|
|
provides integrity protection for application data, while KRB-PRIV
|
|
provides confidentiality along with integrity protection. The KRB-
|
|
CRED message provides a means of securely forwarding credentials from
|
|
the client host to the server host.
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1. KRB-SAFE
|
|
|
|
|
|
The KRB-SAFE message provides integrity protection for an included
|
|
cleartext message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Do we chew up another tag for KRB-SAFE-EXT? That would
|
|
-- allow us to make safe-body optional, allowing for a GSS-MIC
|
|
-- sort of message.
|
|
KRB-SAFE ::= [APPLICATION 20] SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (20),
|
|
safe-body [2] KRB-SAFE-BODY,
|
|
cksum [3] ChecksumOf {
|
|
KRB-SAFE-BODY,
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession }, { ku-KrbSafe-cksum }},
|
|
... -- ASN.1 extensions must be excluded
|
|
-- when sending to rfc1510 implementations
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-SAFE-BODY ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
user-data [0] OCTET STRING,
|
|
timestamp [1] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
usec [2] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
|
|
seq-number [3] SeqNum OPTIONAL,
|
|
s-address [4] HostAddress,
|
|
r-address [5] HostAddress OPTIONAL,
|
|
... -- ASN.1 extensions must be excluded
|
|
-- when sending to rfc1510 implementations
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2. KRB-PRIV
|
|
|
|
|
|
The KRB-PRIV message provides confidentiality and integrity
|
|
protection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 65]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-PRIV ::= [APPLICATION 21] SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (21),
|
|
enc-part [3] EncryptedData {
|
|
EncKrbPrivPart,
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession }, { ku-EncKrbPrivPart }},
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncKrbPrivPart ::= [APPLICATION 28] SEQUENCE {
|
|
user-data [0] OCTET STRING,
|
|
timestamp [1] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
usec [2] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
|
|
seq-number [3] SeqNum OPTIONAL,
|
|
s-address [4] HostAddress -- sender's addr --,
|
|
r-address [5] HostAddress OPTIONAL -- recip's addr --,
|
|
... -- ASN.1 extensions must be excluded
|
|
-- when sending to rfc1510 implementations
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3. KRB-CRED
|
|
|
|
|
|
The KRB-CRED message provides a means of securely transferring
|
|
credentials from the client to the service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-CRED ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 22] KRB-CRED-1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 24] Signed {
|
|
KRB-CRED-EXT,
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession }, { ku-KrbCred-cksum }}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-CRED-COMMON ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (22 | 24),
|
|
tickets [2] SEQUENCE OF Ticket,
|
|
enc-part [3] EncryptedData {
|
|
EncKrbCredPart,
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession }, { ku-EncKrbCredPart }},
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-CRED-1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF KRB-CRED-COMMON
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (22) })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 66]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-CRED-EXT ::= [APPLICATION 24] KRB-CRED-COMMON
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (24) })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncKrbCredPart ::= [APPLICATION 29] SEQUENCE {
|
|
ticket-info [0] SEQUENCE OF KrbCredInfo,
|
|
nonce [1] Nonce OPTIONAL,
|
|
timestamp [2] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
usec [3] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
|
|
s-address [4] HostAddress OPTIONAL,
|
|
r-address [5] HostAddress OPTIONAL
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KrbCredInfo ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
key [0] EncryptionKey,
|
|
prealm [1] Realm OPTIONAL,
|
|
pname [2] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
|
|
flags [3] TicketFlags OPTIONAL,
|
|
authtime [4] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
starttime [5] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
endtime [6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
renew-till [7] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
srealm [8] Realm OPTIONAL,
|
|
sname [9] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
|
|
caddr [10] HostAddresses OPTIONAL
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Security Considerations
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1. Time Synchronization
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time synchronization between the KDC and application servers is
|
|
necessary to prevent acceptance of expired tickets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time synchronization is needed between application servers and
|
|
clients to prevent replay attacks if a replay cache is being used.
|
|
If negotiated subsession keys are used to encrypt application data,
|
|
replay caches may not be necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2. Replays
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.3. Principal Name Reuse
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Section 5.3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.4. Password Guessing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 67]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5. Forward Secrecy
|
|
|
|
|
|
[from KCLAR 10.; needs some rewriting]
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Kerberos protocol in its basic form does not provide perfect
|
|
forward secrecy for communications. If traffic has been recorded by
|
|
an eavesdropper, then messages encrypted using the KRB-PRIV message,
|
|
or messages encrypted using application-specific encryption under
|
|
keys exchanged using Kerberos can be decrypted if any of the user's,
|
|
application server's, or KDC's key is subsequently discovered. This
|
|
is because the session key used to encrypt such messages is
|
|
transmitted over the network encrypted in the key of the application
|
|
server, and also encrypted under the session key from the user's
|
|
ticket-granting ticket when returned to the user in the TGS-REP
|
|
message. The session key from the ticket-granting ticket was sent to
|
|
the user in the AS-REP message encrypted in the user's secret key,
|
|
and embedded in the ticket-granting ticket, which was encrypted in
|
|
the key of the KDC. Application requiring perfect forward secrecy
|
|
must exchange keys through mechanisms that provide such assurance,
|
|
but may use Kerberos for authentication of the encrypted channel
|
|
established through such other means.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6. Authorization
|
|
|
|
|
|
As an authentication service, Kerberos provides a means of verifying
|
|
the identity of principals on a network. Kerberos does not, by
|
|
itself, provide authorization. Applications SHOULD NOT accept the
|
|
mere issuance of a service ticket by the Kerberos server as granting
|
|
authority to use the service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.7. Login Authentication
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some applications, particularly those which provide login access when
|
|
provided with a password, SHOULD NOT treat successful acquisition of
|
|
credentials as sufficient proof of the user's identity. An attacker
|
|
posing as a user could generate an illegitimate KDC-REP message which
|
|
decrypts properly. To authenticate a user logging on to a local
|
|
system, the credentials obtained SHOULD be used in a TGS exchange to
|
|
obtain credentials for a local service. Successful use of those
|
|
credentials to authenticate to the local service assures that the
|
|
initially obtained credentials are from a valid KDC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. IANA Considerations
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ needs more work ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each use of Int32 in this document defines a number space. [ XXX
|
|
enumerate these ] Negative numbers are reserved for private use;
|
|
local and experimental extensions should use these values. Zero is
|
|
reserved and may not be assigned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 68]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Typed hole contents may be identified by either Int32 values or by
|
|
RELATIVE-OID values. Since RELATIVE-OIDs define a hierarchical
|
|
namespace, assignments to the top level of the RELATIVE-OID space may
|
|
be made on a first-come, first-served basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Acknowledgments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Much of the text here is adapted from draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-
|
|
clarifications-07. The description of the general form of the
|
|
extensibility framework was derived from text by Sam Hartman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendices
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. ASN.1 Module (Normative)
|
|
|
|
|
|
KerberosV5Spec3 {
|
|
iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
|
|
security(5) kerberosV5(2) modules(4) krb5spec3(4)
|
|
} DEFINITIONS EXPLICIT TAGS ::= BEGIN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- OID arc for KerberosV5
|
|
--
|
|
-- This OID may be used to identify Kerberos protocol messages
|
|
-- encapsulated in other protocols.
|
|
--
|
|
-- This OID also designates the OID arc for KerberosV5-related
|
|
-- OIDs.
|
|
--
|
|
-- NOTE: RFC 1510 had an incorrect value (5) for "dod" in its
|
|
-- OID.
|
|
id-krb5 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
|
|
iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
|
|
security(5) kerberosV5(2)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 69]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- top-level type
|
|
--
|
|
-- Applications should not directly reference any types
|
|
-- other than KRB-PDU and its component types.
|
|
--
|
|
KRB-PDU ::= CHOICE {
|
|
ticket Ticket,
|
|
as-req AS-REQ,
|
|
as-rep AS-REP,
|
|
tgs-req TGS-REQ,
|
|
tgs-rep TGS-REP,
|
|
ap-req AP-REQ,
|
|
ap-rep AP-REP,
|
|
krb-safe KRB-SAFE,
|
|
krb-priv KRB-PRIV,
|
|
krb-cred KRB-CRED,
|
|
tgt-req TGT-REQ,
|
|
krb-error KRB-ERROR,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- *** basic types
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- signed values representable in 32 bits
|
|
--
|
|
-- These are often used as assigned numbers for various things.
|
|
Int32 ::= INTEGER (-2147483648..2147483647)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Typed hole identifiers
|
|
TH-id ::= CHOICE {
|
|
int32 Int32,
|
|
rel-oid RELATIVE-OID
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- unsigned 32 bit values
|
|
UInt32 ::= INTEGER (0..4294967295)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- unsigned 64 bit values
|
|
UInt64 ::= INTEGER (0..18446744073709551615)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- sequence numbers
|
|
SeqNum ::= UInt64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 70]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- nonces
|
|
Nonce ::= UInt64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- microseconds
|
|
Microseconds ::= INTEGER (0..999999)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KerberosTime ::= GeneralizedTime (CONSTRAINED BY {
|
|
-- MUST NOT include fractional seconds
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- used for names and for error messages
|
|
KerberosString ::= CHOICE {
|
|
ia5 GeneralString (IA5String),
|
|
utf8 UTF8String,
|
|
... -- no extension may be sent
|
|
-- to an rfc1510 implementation --
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- IA5 choice only; useful for constraints
|
|
KerberosStringIA5 ::= KerberosString
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS { ia5 PRESENT })
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- IA5 excluded; useful for constraints
|
|
KerberosStringExt ::= KerberosString
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS { ia5 ABSENT })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- used for language tags
|
|
LangTag ::= PrintableString
|
|
(FROM ("A".."Z" | "a".."z" | "0".."9" | "-"))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 71]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- assigned numbers for name types (used in principal names)
|
|
NameType ::= Int32
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Name type not known
|
|
nt-unknown NameType ::= 0
|
|
-- Just the name of the principal as in DCE, or for users
|
|
nt-principal NameType ::= 1
|
|
-- Service and other unique instance (krbtgt)
|
|
nt-srv-inst NameType ::= 2
|
|
-- Service with host name as instance (telnet, rcommands)
|
|
nt-srv-hst NameType ::= 3
|
|
-- Service with host as remaining components
|
|
nt-srv-xhst NameType ::= 4
|
|
-- Unique ID
|
|
nt-uid NameType ::= 5
|
|
-- Encoded X.509 Distingished name [RFC 2253]
|
|
nt-x500-principal NameType ::= 6
|
|
-- Name in form of SMTP email name (e.g. user@foo.com)
|
|
nt-smtp-name NameType ::= 7
|
|
-- Enterprise name - may be mapped to principal name
|
|
nt-enterprise NameType ::= 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PrincipalName ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
name-type [0] NameType,
|
|
-- May have zero elements, or individual elements may be
|
|
-- zero-length, but this is NOT RECOMMENDED.
|
|
name-string [1] SEQUENCE OF KerberosString
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- IA5 only
|
|
PrincipalNameIA5 ::= PrincipalName (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
name-string (WITH COMPONENT (KerberosStringIA5))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- IA5 excluded
|
|
PrincipalNameExt ::= PrincpalName (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
name-string (WITH COMPONENT (KerberosStringExt))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 72]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realm ::= KerberosString
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- IA5 only
|
|
RealmIA5 ::= Realm (KerberosStringIA5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- IA5 excluded
|
|
RealmExt ::= Realm (KerberosStringExt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KerberosFlags { NamedBits } ::= BIT STRING (SIZE (32..MAX))
|
|
(CONSTRAINED BY {
|
|
-- MUST be a valid value of -- NamedBits
|
|
-- but if the value to be sent would be truncated to shorter
|
|
-- than 32 bits according to DER, the value MUST be padded
|
|
-- with trailing zero bits to 32 bits. Otherwise, no
|
|
-- trailing zero bits may be present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AddrType ::= Int32
|
|
|
|
|
|
HostAddress ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
addr-type [0] AddrType,
|
|
address [1] OCTET STRING
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- NOTE: HostAddresses is always used as an OPTIONAL field and
|
|
-- should not be a zero-length SEQUENCE OF.
|
|
--
|
|
-- The extensible messages explicitly constrain this to be
|
|
-- non-empty.
|
|
HostAddresses ::= SEQUENCE OF HostAddress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- *** crypto-related types and assignments
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 73]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Assigned numbers denoting encryption mechanisms.
|
|
EType ::= Int32
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- assigned numbers for encryption schemes
|
|
et-des-cbc-crc EType ::= 1
|
|
et-des-cbc-md4 EType ::= 2
|
|
et-des-cbc-md5 EType ::= 3
|
|
-- [reserved] 4
|
|
et-des3-cbc-md5 EType ::= 5
|
|
-- [reserved] 6
|
|
et-des3-cbc-sha1 EType ::= 7
|
|
et-dsaWithSHA1-CmsOID EType ::= 9
|
|
et-md5WithRSAEncryption-CmsOID EType ::= 10
|
|
et-sha1WithRSAEncryption-CmsOID EType ::= 11
|
|
et-rc2CBC-EnvOID EType ::= 12
|
|
et-rsaEncryption-EnvOID EType ::= 13
|
|
et-rsaES-OAEP-ENV-OID EType ::= 14
|
|
et-des-ede3-cbc-Env-OID EType ::= 15
|
|
et-des3-cbc-sha1-kd EType ::= 16
|
|
-- AES
|
|
et-aes128-cts-hmac-sha1-96 EType ::= 17
|
|
-- AES
|
|
et-aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96 EType ::= 18
|
|
-- Microsoft
|
|
et-rc4-hmac EType ::= 23
|
|
-- Microsoft
|
|
et-rc4-hmac-exp EType ::= 24
|
|
-- opaque; PacketCable
|
|
et-subkey-keymaterial EType ::= 65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 74]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Assigned numbers denoting key usages.
|
|
KeyUsage ::= UInt32
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- Actual identifier names are provisional and subject to
|
|
-- change.
|
|
--
|
|
ku-pa-enc-ts KeyUsage ::= 1
|
|
ku-Ticket KeyUsage ::= 2
|
|
ku-EncASRepPart KeyUsage ::= 3
|
|
ku-TGSReqAuthData-sesskey KeyUsage ::= 4
|
|
ku-TGSReqAuthData-subkey KeyUsage ::= 5
|
|
ku-pa-TGSReq-cksum KeyUsage ::= 6
|
|
ku-pa-TGSReq-authenticator KeyUsage ::= 7
|
|
ku-EncTGSRepPart-sesskey KeyUsage ::= 8
|
|
ku-EncTGSRepPart-subkey KeyUsage ::= 9
|
|
ku-Authenticator-cksum KeyUsage ::= 10
|
|
ku-APReq-authenticator KeyUsage ::= 11
|
|
ku-EncAPRepPart KeyUsage ::= 12
|
|
ku-EncKrbPrivPart KeyUsage ::= 13
|
|
ku-EncKrbCredPart KeyUsage ::= 14
|
|
ku-KrbSafe-cksum KeyUsage ::= 15
|
|
ku-ad-KDCIssued-cksum KeyUsage ::= 19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- The following numbers are provisional...
|
|
-- conflicts may exist elsewhere.
|
|
ku-Ticket-cksum KeyUsage ::= 25
|
|
ku-ASReq-cksum KeyUsage ::= 26
|
|
ku-TGSReq-cksum KeyUsage ::= 27
|
|
ku-ASRep-cksum KeyUsage ::= 28
|
|
ku-TGSRep-cksum KeyUsage ::= 29
|
|
ku-APReq-cksum KeyUsage ::= 30
|
|
ku-APRep-cksum KeyUsage ::= 31
|
|
ku-KrbCred-cksum KeyUsage ::= 32
|
|
ku-KrbError-cksum KeyUsage ::= 33
|
|
ku-KDCRep-cksum KeyUsage ::= 34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 75]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- KeyToUse identifies which key is to be used to encrypt or
|
|
-- sign a given value.
|
|
--
|
|
-- Values of KeyToUse are never actually transmitted over the
|
|
-- wire, or even used directly by the implementation in any
|
|
-- way, as key usages are; it exists primarily to identify
|
|
-- which key gets used for what purpose. Thus, the specific
|
|
-- numeric values associated with this type are irrelevant.
|
|
KeyToUse ::= ENUMERATED {
|
|
-- unspecified
|
|
key-unspecified,
|
|
-- server long term key
|
|
key-server,
|
|
-- client long term key
|
|
key-client,
|
|
-- key selected by KDC for encryption of a KDC-REP
|
|
key-kdc-rep,
|
|
-- session key from ticket
|
|
key-session,
|
|
-- subsession key negotiated via AP-REQ/AP-REP
|
|
key-subsession,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncryptionKey ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
keytype [0] EType,
|
|
keyvalue [1] OCTET STRING
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 76]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- "Type" specifies which ASN.1 type is encrypted to the
|
|
-- ciphertext in the EncryptedData. "Keys" specifies a set of
|
|
-- keys of which one key may be used to encrypt the data.
|
|
-- "KeyUsages" specifies a set of key usages, one of which may
|
|
-- be used to encrypt.
|
|
--
|
|
-- None of the parameters is transmitted over the wire.
|
|
EncryptedData {
|
|
Type, KeyToUse:Keys, KeyUsage:KeyUsages
|
|
} ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
etype [0] EType,
|
|
kvno [1] UInt32 OPTIONAL,
|
|
cipher [2] OCTET STRING (CONSTRAINED BY {
|
|
-- must be encryption of --
|
|
OCTET STRING (CONTAINING Type),
|
|
-- with one of the keys -- KeyToUse:Keys,
|
|
-- with key usage being one of --
|
|
KeyUsage:KeyUsages
|
|
}),
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CksumType ::= Int32
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- The parameters specify which key to use to produce the
|
|
-- signature, as well as which key usage to use. The
|
|
-- parameters are not actually sent over the wire.
|
|
Checksum {
|
|
KeyToUse:Keys, KeyUsage:KeyUsages
|
|
} ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
cksumtype [0] CksumType,
|
|
checksum [1] OCTET STRING (CONSTRAINED BY {
|
|
-- signed using one of the keys --
|
|
KeyToUse:Keys,
|
|
-- with key usage being one of --
|
|
KeyUsage:KeyUsages
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 77]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- a Checksum that must contain the checksum
|
|
-- of a particular type
|
|
ChecksumOf {
|
|
Type, KeyToUse:Keys, KeyUsage:KeyUsages
|
|
} ::= Checksum { Keys, KeyUsages } (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
checksum (CONSTRAINED BY {
|
|
-- must be checksum of --
|
|
OCTET STRING (CONTAINING Type)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- parameterized type for wrapping authenticated plaintext
|
|
Signed {
|
|
InnerType, KeyToUse:Keys, KeyUsage:KeyUsages
|
|
} ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
cksum [0] ChecksumOf {
|
|
InnerType, Keys, KeyUsages
|
|
} OPTIONAL,
|
|
inner [1] InnerType,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- *** Tickets
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ticket ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 1] Ticket1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 4] Signed {
|
|
TicketExt, { key-server }, { ku-Ticket-cksum }
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- takes a parameter specifying which type gets encrypted
|
|
TicketCommon { EncPart } ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
tkt-vno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
realm [1] Realm,
|
|
sname [2] PrincipalName,
|
|
enc-part [3] EncryptedData {
|
|
EncPart, { key-server }, { ku-Ticket }
|
|
},
|
|
...,
|
|
extensions [4] TicketExtensions OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 78]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ticket1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF TicketCommon { EncTicketPart1510 }
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
-- explicitly force IA5 in strings
|
|
realm (RealmIA5),
|
|
sname (PrincipalNameIA5)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- APPLICATION tag goes inside Signed{} as well as outside,
|
|
-- to prevent possible substitution attacks.
|
|
TicketExt ::= [APPLICATION 4] TicketCommon {
|
|
EncTicketPartExt
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
-- explicitly force UTF-8 in strings
|
|
realm (RealmExt),
|
|
sname (PrincipalNameExt)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Encrypted part of ticket
|
|
EncTicketPart ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 3] EncTicketPart1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 5] EncTicketPartExt
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncTicketPartCommon ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
flags [0] TicketFlags,
|
|
key [1] EncryptionKey,
|
|
crealm [2] Realm,
|
|
cname [3] PrincipalName,
|
|
transited [4] TransitedEncoding,
|
|
authtime [5] KerberosTime,
|
|
starttime [6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
endtime [7] KerberosTime,
|
|
renew-till [8] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
caddr [9] HostAddresses OPTIONAL,
|
|
authorization-data [10] AuthorizationData OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 79]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncTicketPart1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF EncTicketPartCommon
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
-- explicitly force IA5 in strings
|
|
crealm (RealmIA5),
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameIA5)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncTicketPartExt ::= EncTicketPartCommon (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
-- explicitly force UTF-8 in strings
|
|
crealm (RealmExt),
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameExt),
|
|
-- explicitly constrain caddr to be non-empty if present
|
|
caddr (SIZE (1..MAX)),
|
|
-- forbid empty authorization-data encodings
|
|
authorization-data (SIZE (1..MAX))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- *** Authorization Data
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADType ::= TH-id
|
|
|
|
|
|
AuthorizationData ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
|
|
ad-type [0] ADType,
|
|
ad-data [1] OCTET STRING
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ad-if-relevant ADType ::= int32 : 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Encapsulates another AuthorizationData.
|
|
-- Intended for application servers; receiving application servers
|
|
-- MAY ignore.
|
|
AD-IF-RELEVANT ::= AuthorizationData
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 80]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- KDC-issued privilege attributes
|
|
ad-kdcissued ADType ::= int32 : 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
AD-KDCIssued ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
ad-checksum [0] ChecksumOf {
|
|
AuthorizationData, { key-session },
|
|
{ ku-ad-KDCIssued-cksum }},
|
|
i-realm [1] Realm OPTIONAL,
|
|
i-sname [2] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
|
|
elements [3] AuthorizationData
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ad-and-or ADType ::= int32 : 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
AD-AND-OR ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
condition-count [0] INTEGER,
|
|
elements [1] AuthorizationData
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- KDCs MUST interpret any AuthorizationData wrapped in this.
|
|
ad-mandatory-for-kdc ADType ::= int32 : 8
|
|
AD-MANDATORY-FOR-KDC ::= AuthorizationData
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TrType ::= TH-id -- must be registered
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- encoded Transited field
|
|
TransitedEncoding ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
tr-type [0] TrType,
|
|
contents [1] OCTET STRING
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEType ::= TH-id
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- ticket extensions: for TicketExt only
|
|
TicketExtensions ::= SEQUENCE (SIZE (1..MAX)) OF SEQUENCE {
|
|
te-type [0] TEType,
|
|
te-data [1] OCTET STRING
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 81]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
TicketFlags ::= KerberosFlags { TicketFlagsBits }
|
|
|
|
|
|
TicketFlagsBits ::= BIT STRING {
|
|
reserved (0),
|
|
forwardable (1),
|
|
forwarded (2),
|
|
proxiable (3),
|
|
proxy (4),
|
|
may-postdate (5),
|
|
postdated (6),
|
|
invalid (7),
|
|
renewable (8),
|
|
initial (9),
|
|
pre-authent (10),
|
|
hw-authent (11),
|
|
transited-policy-checked (12),
|
|
ok-as-delegate (13),
|
|
anonymous (14),
|
|
cksummed-ticket (15)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- *** KDC protocol
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 82]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS-REQ ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 10] KDC-REQ-1510
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (10),
|
|
-- AS-REQ must include client name
|
|
req-body (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., cname PRESENT })
|
|
}),
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 6] Signed {
|
|
-- APPLICATION tag goes inside Signed{} as well as
|
|
-- outside, to prevent possible substitution attacks.
|
|
[APPLICATION 6] KDC-REQ-EXT,
|
|
-- not sure this is correct key to use; do we even want
|
|
-- to sign AS-REQ?
|
|
{ key-client },
|
|
{ ku-ASReq-cksum }
|
|
}
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (6),
|
|
-- AS-REQ must include client name
|
|
req-body (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., cname PRESENT })
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TGS-REQ ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 12] KDC-REQ-1510
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (12),
|
|
-- client name optional in TGS-REQ
|
|
req-body (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., cname ABSENT })
|
|
}),
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 8] Signed {
|
|
-- APPLICATION tag goes inside Signed{} as well as
|
|
-- outside, to prevent possible substitution attacks.
|
|
[APPLICATION 8] KDC-REQ-EXT,
|
|
{ key-session }, { ku-TGSReq-cksum }
|
|
}
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (8),
|
|
-- client name optional in TGS-REQ
|
|
req-body (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., cname ABSENT })
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 83]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REQ-COMMON ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
-- NOTE: first tag is [1], not [0]
|
|
pvno [1] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [2] INTEGER (10 -- AS-REQ.rfc1510 --
|
|
| 12 -- TGS-REQ.rfc1510 --
|
|
| 6 -- AS-REQ.ext --
|
|
| 8 -- TGS-REQ.ext -- ),
|
|
padata [3] SEQUENCE OF PA-DATA OPTIONAL
|
|
-- NOTE: not empty
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REQ-1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF KDC-REQ-COMMON,
|
|
req-body [4] KDC-REQ-BODY-1510
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (10 | 12) })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- APPLICATION tag goes inside Signed{} as well as outside,
|
|
-- to prevent possible substitution attacks.
|
|
KDC-REQ-EXT ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF KDC-REQ-COMMON,
|
|
req-body [4] KDC-REQ-BODY-EXT,
|
|
...
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (6 | 8),
|
|
padata (SIZE (1..MAX))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 84]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REQ-BODY-COMMON ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
kdc-options [0] KDCOptions,
|
|
cname [1] PrincipalName OPTIONAL
|
|
-- Used only in AS-REQ --,
|
|
|
|
|
|
realm [2] Realm
|
|
-- Server's realm; also client's in AS-REQ --,
|
|
|
|
|
|
sname [3] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
|
|
from [4] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
till [5] KerberosTime OPTIONAL
|
|
-- was required in rfc1510;
|
|
-- still required for compat versions
|
|
-- of messages --,
|
|
|
|
|
|
rtime [6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
nonce [7] Nonce,
|
|
etype [8] SEQUENCE OF EType
|
|
-- in preference order --,
|
|
|
|
|
|
addresses [9] HostAddresses OPTIONAL,
|
|
enc-authorization-data [10] EncryptedData {
|
|
AuthorizationData, { key-session | key-subsession },
|
|
{ ku-TGSReqAuthData-subkey |
|
|
ku-TGSReqAuthData-sesskey }
|
|
} OPTIONAL,
|
|
|
|
|
|
additional-tickets [11] SEQUENCE OF Ticket OPTIONAL
|
|
-- NOTE: not empty --,
|
|
...
|
|
lang-tags [5] SEQUENCE (SIZE (1..MAX)) OF
|
|
LangTag OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REQ-BODY-1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF KDC-REQ-BODY-COMMON
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameIA5),
|
|
realm (RealmIA5),
|
|
sname (PrincipalNameIA5),
|
|
till PRESENT,
|
|
nonce (UInt32)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 85]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REQ-BODY-EXT ::= KDC-REQ-BODY-COMMON
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameExt),
|
|
realm (RealmExt),
|
|
sname (PrincipalNameExt),
|
|
addresses (SIZE (1..MAX)),
|
|
enc-authorization-data (EncryptedData {
|
|
AuthorizationData (SIZE (1..MAX)),
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession },
|
|
{ ku-TGSReqAuthData-subkey |
|
|
ku-TGSReqAuthData-sesskey }
|
|
}),
|
|
additional-tickets (SIZE (1..MAX))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDCOptions ::= KerberosFlags { KDCOptionsBits }
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDCOptionsBits ::= BIT STRING {
|
|
reserved (0),
|
|
forwardable (1),
|
|
forwarded (2),
|
|
proxiable (3),
|
|
proxy (4),
|
|
allow-postdate (5),
|
|
postdated (6),
|
|
unused7 (7),
|
|
renewable (8),
|
|
unused9 (9),
|
|
unused10 (10),
|
|
unused11 (11),
|
|
unused12 (12),
|
|
unused13 (13),
|
|
requestanonymous (14),
|
|
canonicalize (15),
|
|
disable-transited-check (26),
|
|
renewable-ok (27),
|
|
enc-tkt-in-skey (28),
|
|
renew (30),
|
|
validate (31)
|
|
-- XXX need "need ticket1" flag?
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 86]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS-REP ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 11] KDC-REP-1510 {
|
|
EncASRepPart1510
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (11) }),
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 7] Signed {
|
|
[APPLICATION 7] KDC-REP-EXT { EncASRepPartExt },
|
|
{ key-reply }, { ku-ASRep-cksum }
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (7) })
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TGS-REP ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 13] KDC-REP-1510 {
|
|
EncTGSRepPart1510
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (13) }),
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 9] Signed {
|
|
[APPLICATION 9] KDC-REP-EXT { EncTGSRepPartExt },
|
|
{ key-reply }, { ku-TGSRep-cksum }
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (9) })
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 87]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REP-COMMON { EncPart } ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (11 -- AS-REP.rfc1510 -- |
|
|
13 -- TGS.rfc1510 -- |
|
|
7 -- AS-REP.ext -- |
|
|
9 -- TGS-REP.ext -- ),
|
|
padata [2] SEQUENCE OF PA-DATA OPTIONAL,
|
|
crealm [3] Realm,
|
|
cname [4] PrincipalName,
|
|
ticket [5] Ticket,
|
|
|
|
|
|
enc-part [6] EncryptedData {
|
|
EncPart,
|
|
{ key-reply },
|
|
-- maybe reach into EncryptedData in AS-REP/TGS-REP
|
|
-- definitions to apply constraints on key usages?
|
|
{ ku-EncASRepPart -- if AS-REP -- |
|
|
ku-EncTGSRepPart-subkey -- if TGS-REP and
|
|
-- using Authenticator
|
|
-- session key -- |
|
|
ku-EncTGSRepPart-sesskey -- if TGS-REP and using
|
|
-- subsession key -- }
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
...,
|
|
-- In extensible version, KDC signs original request
|
|
-- to avoid replay attacks against client.
|
|
req-cksum [7] ChecksumOf { CHOICE {
|
|
as-req AS-REQ,
|
|
tgs-req TGS-REQ
|
|
}, { key-reply }, { ku-KDCRep-cksum }} OPTIONAL,
|
|
lang-tag [8] LangTag OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REP-1510 { EncPart } ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF KDC-REP-COMMON { EncPart }
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (11 | 13),
|
|
crealm (RealmIA5),
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameIA5)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 88]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KDC-REP-EXT { EncPart } ::= KDC-REP-COMMON { EncPart }
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (7 | 9),
|
|
crealm (RealmExt),
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameExt)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncASRepPart1510 ::= [APPLICATION 25] EncKDCRepPart1510
|
|
EncTGSRepPart1510 ::= [APPLICATION 26] EncKDCRepPart1510
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncASRepPartExt ::= [APPLICATION 32] EncKDCRepPartExt
|
|
EncTGSRepPartExt ::= [APPLICATION 33] EncKDCRepPartExt
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncKDCRepPartCom ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
key [0] EncryptionKey,
|
|
last-req [1] LastReq,
|
|
nonce [2] Nonce,
|
|
key-expiration [3] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
flags [4] TicketFlags,
|
|
authtime [5] KerberosTime,
|
|
starttime [6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
endtime [7] KerberosTime,
|
|
renew-till [8] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
srealm [9] Realm,
|
|
sname [10] PrincipalName,
|
|
caddr [11] HostAddresses OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncKDCRepPart1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF EncKDCRepPartCom
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
srealm (RealmIA5),
|
|
sname (PrincipalNameIA5),
|
|
nonce UInt32 })
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncKdcRepPartExt ::= EncKDCRepPartCom (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
srealm (RealmExt),
|
|
sname (PrincipalNameExt)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 89]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
LRType ::= TH-id
|
|
LastReq ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
|
|
lr-type [0] LRType,
|
|
lr-value [1] KerberosTime
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- *** preauth
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PaDataType ::= TH-id
|
|
PaDataOID ::= RELATIVE-OID
|
|
|
|
|
|
PA-DATA ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
-- NOTE: first tag is [1], not [0]
|
|
padata-type [1] PaDataType,
|
|
padata-value [2] OCTET STRING
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- AP-REQ authenticating a TGS-REQ
|
|
pa-tgs-req PaDataType ::= int32 : 1
|
|
PA-TGS-REQ ::= AP-REQ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Encrypted timestamp preauth
|
|
-- Encryption key used is client's long-term key.
|
|
pa-enc-timestamp PaDataType ::= int32 : 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP ::= EncryptedData {
|
|
PA-ENC-TS-ENC, { key-client }, { ku-pa-enc-ts }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
PA-ENC-TS-ENC ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
patimestamp [0] KerberosTime -- client's time --,
|
|
pausec [1] Microseconds OPTIONAL
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 90]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Hints returned in AS-REP or KRB-ERROR to help client
|
|
-- choose a password-derived key, either for preauthentication
|
|
-- or for decryption of the reply.
|
|
pa-etype-info PaDataType ::= int32 : 11
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETYPE-INFO ::= SEQUENCE OF ETYPE-INFO-ENTRY
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETYPE-INFO-ENTRY ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
etype [0] EType,
|
|
salt [1] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Similar to etype-info, but with parameters provided for
|
|
-- the string-to-key function.
|
|
pa-etype-info2 PaDataType ::= int32 : 19
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETYPE-INFO2 ::= SEQUENCE (SIZE (1..MAX))
|
|
OF ETYPE-INFO-ENTRY
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETYPE-INFO2-ENTRY ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
etype [0] EType,
|
|
salt [1] KerberosString OPTIONAL,
|
|
s2kparams [2] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Obsolescent. Salt for client's long-term key.
|
|
-- Its character encoding is unspecified.
|
|
pa-pw-salt PaDataType ::= int32 : 3
|
|
-- The "padata-value" does not encode an ASN.1 type.
|
|
-- Instead, "padata-value" must consist of the salt string to
|
|
-- be used by the client, in an unspecified character
|
|
-- encoding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- An extensible AS-REQ may be sent as a padata in a
|
|
-- non-extensible AS-REQ to allow for backwards compatibility.
|
|
pa-as-req PaDataType ::= int32 : 42 -- provisional
|
|
PA-AS-REQ ::= AS-REQ (WITH COMPONENTS ext)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- *** Session key exchange
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 91]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REQ ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 14] AP-REQ-1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 18] Signed {
|
|
AP-REQ-EXT, { key-session }, { ku-APReq-cksum }
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REQ-COMMON ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (14 | 18),
|
|
ap-options [2] APOptions,
|
|
ticket [3] Ticket,
|
|
authenticator [4] EncryptedData {
|
|
Authenticator,
|
|
{ key-session },
|
|
{ ku-APReq-authenticator |
|
|
ku-pa-TGSReq-authenticator }
|
|
},
|
|
...,
|
|
extensions [5] ApReqExtensions OPTIONAL,
|
|
lang-tag [6] SEQUENCE (SIZE (1..MAX))
|
|
OF LangTag OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REQ-1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF AP-REQ-COMMON
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (14),
|
|
authenticator (EncryptedData {
|
|
Authenticator (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
crealm (RealmIA5),
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameIA5),
|
|
seqnum (UInt32)
|
|
}), { key-session }, { ku-APReq-authenticator }})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 92]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REQ-EXT ::= AP-REQ-COMMON
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (18),
|
|
-- The following constraints on Authenticator assume that
|
|
-- we want to restrict the use of AP-REQ-EXT with TicketExt
|
|
-- only, since that is the only way we can enforce UTF-8.
|
|
authenticator (EncryptedData {
|
|
Authenticator (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
crealm (RealmExt),
|
|
cname (PrincipalNameExt),
|
|
authorization-data (SIZE (1..MAX))
|
|
}), { key-session }, { ku-APReq-authenticator }})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ApReqExtType ::= TH-id
|
|
|
|
|
|
ApReqExtensions ::= SEQUENCE (SIZE (1..MAX)) OF SEQUENCE {
|
|
apReqExt-Type [0] ApReqExtType,
|
|
apReqExt-Data [1] OCTET STRING
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APOptions ::= KerberosFlags { APOptionsBits }
|
|
|
|
|
|
APOptionsBits ::= BIT STRING {
|
|
reserved (0),
|
|
use-session-key (1),
|
|
mutual-required (2)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- plaintext of authenticator
|
|
Authenticator ::= [APPLICATION 2] SEQUENCE {
|
|
authenticator-vno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
crealm [1] Realm,
|
|
cname [2] PrincipalName,
|
|
cksum [3] Checksum {{ key-session },
|
|
{ ku-Authenticator-cksum |
|
|
ku-pa-TGSReq-cksum }} OPTIONAL,
|
|
cusec [4] Microseconds,
|
|
ctime [5] KerberosTime,
|
|
subkey [6] EncryptionKey OPTIONAL,
|
|
seq-number [7] SeqNum OPTIONAL,
|
|
authorization-data [8] AuthorizationData OPTIONAL
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 93]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REP ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 15] AP-REP-1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 19] Signed {
|
|
AP-REP-EXT,
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession }, { ku-APRep-cksum }}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REP-COMMON { EncPart } ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (15 | 19),
|
|
enc-part [2] EncryptedData {
|
|
EncPart,
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession }, { ku-EncAPRepPart }},
|
|
...,
|
|
extensions [3] ApRepExtensions OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REP-1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF AP-REP-COMMON { EncAPRepPart1510 }
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (15)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AP-REP-EXT ::= [APPLICATION 19] AP-REP-COMMON {
|
|
EncAPRepPartExt
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (19) })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ApRepExtType ::= TH-id
|
|
|
|
|
|
ApRepExtensions ::= SEQUENCE (SIZE (1..MAX)) OF SEQUENCE {
|
|
apRepExt-Type [0] ApRepExtType,
|
|
apRepExt-Data [1] OCTET STRING
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncAPRepPart ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 27] EncAPRepPart1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 31] EncAPRepPartExt
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 94]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncAPRepPart1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF ENCAPRepPartCom
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
seq-number (UInt32),
|
|
authorization-data ABSENT
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncAPRepPartExt ::= EncAPRepPartCom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncAPRepPartCom ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
ctime [0] KerberosTime,
|
|
cusec [1] Microseconds,
|
|
subkey [2] EncryptionKey OPTIONAL,
|
|
seq-number [3] SeqNum OPTIONAL,
|
|
...,
|
|
authorization-data [4] AuthorizationData OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- *** Application messages
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Do we chew up another tag for KRB-SAFE-EXT? That would
|
|
-- allow us to make safe-body optional, allowing for a GSS-MIC
|
|
-- sort of message.
|
|
KRB-SAFE ::= [APPLICATION 20] SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (20),
|
|
safe-body [2] KRB-SAFE-BODY,
|
|
cksum [3] ChecksumOf {
|
|
KRB-SAFE-BODY,
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession }, { ku-KrbSafe-cksum }},
|
|
... -- ASN.1 extensions must be excluded
|
|
-- when sending to rfc1510 implementations
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 95]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-SAFE-BODY ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
user-data [0] OCTET STRING,
|
|
timestamp [1] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
usec [2] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
|
|
seq-number [3] SeqNum OPTIONAL,
|
|
s-address [4] HostAddress,
|
|
r-address [5] HostAddress OPTIONAL,
|
|
... -- ASN.1 extensions must be excluded
|
|
-- when sending to rfc1510 implementations
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-PRIV ::= [APPLICATION 21] SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (21),
|
|
enc-part [3] EncryptedData {
|
|
EncKrbPrivPart,
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession }, { ku-EncKrbPrivPart }},
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncKrbPrivPart ::= [APPLICATION 28] SEQUENCE {
|
|
user-data [0] OCTET STRING,
|
|
timestamp [1] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
usec [2] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
|
|
seq-number [3] SeqNum OPTIONAL,
|
|
s-address [4] HostAddress -- sender's addr --,
|
|
r-address [5] HostAddress OPTIONAL -- recip's addr --,
|
|
... -- ASN.1 extensions must be excluded
|
|
-- when sending to rfc1510 implementations
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-CRED ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 22] KRB-CRED-1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 24] Signed {
|
|
KRB-CRED-EXT,
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession }, { ku-KrbCred-cksum }}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 96]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-CRED-COMMON ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (22 | 24),
|
|
tickets [2] SEQUENCE OF Ticket,
|
|
enc-part [3] EncryptedData {
|
|
EncKrbCredPart,
|
|
{ key-session | key-subsession }, { ku-EncKrbCredPart }},
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-CRED-1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF KRB-CRED-COMMON
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (22) })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-CRED-EXT ::= [APPLICATION 24] KRB-CRED-COMMON
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (24) })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EncKrbCredPart ::= [APPLICATION 29] SEQUENCE {
|
|
ticket-info [0] SEQUENCE OF KrbCredInfo,
|
|
nonce [1] Nonce OPTIONAL,
|
|
timestamp [2] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
usec [3] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
|
|
s-address [4] HostAddress OPTIONAL,
|
|
r-address [5] HostAddress OPTIONAL
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KrbCredInfo ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
key [0] EncryptionKey,
|
|
prealm [1] Realm OPTIONAL,
|
|
pname [2] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
|
|
flags [3] TicketFlags OPTIONAL,
|
|
authtime [4] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
starttime [5] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
endtime [6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
renew-till [7] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
srealm [8] Realm OPTIONAL,
|
|
sname [9] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
|
|
caddr [10] HostAddresses OPTIONAL
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 97]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
TGT-REQ ::= [APPLICATION 16] SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (16),
|
|
sname [2] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
|
|
srealm [3] Realm OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- *** Error messages
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ErrCode ::= Int32
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-ERROR ::= CHOICE {
|
|
rfc1510 [APPLICATION 30] KRB-ERROR-1510,
|
|
ext [APPLICATION 23] Signed {
|
|
KRB-ERROR-EXT, { ku-KrbError-cksum } }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-ERROR-COMMON ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
|
|
msg-type [1] INTEGER (30 | 23),
|
|
ctime [2] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
|
|
cusec [3] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
|
|
stime [4] KerberosTime,
|
|
susec [5] Microseconds,
|
|
error-code [6] ErrCode,
|
|
crealm [7] Realm OPTIONAL,
|
|
cname [8] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
|
|
realm [9] Realm -- Correct realm --,
|
|
sname [10] PrincipalName -- Correct name --,
|
|
e-text [11] KerberosString OPTIONAL,
|
|
e-data [12] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL,
|
|
...,
|
|
typed-data [13] TYPED-DATA OPTIONAL,
|
|
nonce [14] Nonce OPTIONAL,
|
|
lang-tag [15] LangTag OPTIONAL,
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 98]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-ERROR-1510 ::= SEQUENCE {
|
|
COMPONENTS OF KRB-ERROR-COMMON
|
|
} (WITH COMPONENTS {
|
|
...,
|
|
msg-type (30)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KRB-ERROR-EXT ::= [APPLICATION 23] KRB-ERROR-COMMON
|
|
(WITH COMPONENTS { ..., msg-type (23) })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
METHOD-DATA ::= SEQUENCE OF PA-DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDType ::= TH-id
|
|
|
|
|
|
TYPED-DATA ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF SEQUENCE {
|
|
data-type [0] TDType,
|
|
data-value [1] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 99]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- *** Error codes
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- No error
|
|
kdc-err-none ErrCode ::= 0
|
|
-- Client's entry in database has expired
|
|
kdc-err-name-exp ErrCode ::= 1
|
|
-- Server's entry in database has expired
|
|
kdc-err-service-exp ErrCode ::= 2
|
|
-- Requested protocol version number not supported
|
|
kdc-err-bad-pvno ErrCode ::= 3
|
|
-- Client's key encrypted in old master key
|
|
kdc-err-c-old-mast-kvno ErrCode ::= 4
|
|
-- Server's key encrypted in old master key
|
|
kdc-err-s-old-mast-kvno ErrCode ::= 5
|
|
-- Client not found in Kerberos database
|
|
kdc-err-c-principal-unknown ErrCode ::= 6
|
|
-- Server not found in Kerberos database
|
|
kdc-err-s-principal-unknown ErrCode ::= 7
|
|
-- Multiple principal entries in database
|
|
kdc-err-principal-not-unique ErrCode ::= 8
|
|
-- The client or server has a null key
|
|
kdc-err-null-key ErrCode ::= 9
|
|
-- Ticket not eligible for postdating
|
|
kdc-err-cannot-postdate ErrCode ::= 10
|
|
-- Requested start time is later than end time
|
|
kdc-err-never-valid ErrCode ::= 11
|
|
-- KDC policy rejects request
|
|
kdc-err-policy ErrCode ::= 12
|
|
-- KDC cannot accommodate requested option
|
|
kdc-err-badoption ErrCode ::= 13
|
|
-- KDC has no support for encryption type
|
|
kdc-err-etype-nosupp ErrCode ::= 14
|
|
-- KDC has no support for checksum type
|
|
kdc-err-sumtype-nosupp ErrCode ::= 15
|
|
-- KDC has no support for padata type
|
|
kdc-err-padata-type-nosupp ErrCode ::= 16
|
|
-- KDC has no support for transited type
|
|
kdc-err-trtype-nosupp ErrCode ::= 17
|
|
-- Clients credentials have been revoked
|
|
kdc-err-client-revoked ErrCode ::= 18
|
|
-- Credentials for server have been revoked
|
|
kdc-err-service-revoked ErrCode ::= 19
|
|
-- TGT has been revoked
|
|
kdc-err-tgt-revoked ErrCode ::= 20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 100]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Client not yet valid - try again later
|
|
kdc-err-client-notyet ErrCode ::= 21
|
|
-- Server not yet valid - try again later
|
|
kdc-err-service-notyet ErrCode ::= 22
|
|
-- Password has expired - change password to reset
|
|
kdc-err-key-expired ErrCode ::= 23
|
|
-- Pre-authentication information was invalid
|
|
kdc-err-preauth-failed ErrCode ::= 24
|
|
-- Additional pre-authenticationrequired
|
|
kdc-err-preauth-required ErrCode ::= 25
|
|
-- Requested server and ticket don't match
|
|
kdc-err-server-nomatch ErrCode ::= 26
|
|
-- Server principal valid for user2user only
|
|
kdc-err-must-use-user2user ErrCode ::= 27
|
|
-- KDC Policy rejects transited path
|
|
kdc-err-path-not-accpeted ErrCode ::= 28
|
|
-- A service is not available
|
|
kdc-err-svc-unavailable ErrCode ::= 29
|
|
-- Integrity check on decrypted field failed
|
|
krb-ap-err-bad-integrity ErrCode ::= 31
|
|
-- Ticket expired
|
|
krb-ap-err-tkt-expired ErrCode ::= 32
|
|
-- Ticket not yet valid
|
|
krb-ap-err-tkt-nyv ErrCode ::= 33
|
|
-- Request is a replay
|
|
krb-ap-err-repeat ErrCode ::= 34
|
|
-- The ticket isn't for us
|
|
krb-ap-err-not-us ErrCode ::= 35
|
|
-- Ticket and authenticator don't match
|
|
krb-ap-err-badmatch ErrCode ::= 36
|
|
-- Clock skew too great
|
|
krb-ap-err-skew ErrCode ::= 37
|
|
-- Incorrect net address
|
|
krb-ap-err-badaddr ErrCode ::= 38
|
|
-- Protocol version mismatch
|
|
krb-ap-err-badversion ErrCode ::= 39
|
|
-- Invalid msg type
|
|
krb-ap-err-msg-type ErrCode ::= 40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 101]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Message stream modified
|
|
krb-ap-err-modified ErrCode ::= 41
|
|
-- Message out of order
|
|
krb-ap-err-badorder ErrCode ::= 42
|
|
-- Specified version of key is not available
|
|
krb-ap-err-badkeyver ErrCode ::= 44
|
|
-- Service key not available
|
|
krb-ap-err-nokey ErrCode ::= 45
|
|
-- Mutual authentication failed
|
|
krb-ap-err-mut-fail ErrCode ::= 46
|
|
-- Incorrect message direction
|
|
krb-ap-err-baddirection ErrCode ::= 47
|
|
-- Alternative authentication method required
|
|
krb-ap-err-method ErrCode ::= 48
|
|
-- Incorrect sequence number in message
|
|
krb-ap-err-badseq ErrCode ::= 49
|
|
-- Inappropriate type of checksum in message
|
|
krb-ap-err-inapp-cksum ErrCode ::= 50
|
|
-- Policy rejects transited path
|
|
krb-ap-path-not-accepted ErrCode ::= 51
|
|
-- Response too big for UDP, retry with TCP
|
|
krb-err-response-too-big ErrCode ::= 52
|
|
-- Generic error (description in e-text)
|
|
krb-err-generic ErrCode ::= 60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 102]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Field is too long for this implementation
|
|
krb-err-field-toolong ErrCode ::= 61
|
|
-- Reserved for PKINIT
|
|
kdc-error-client-not-trusted ErrCode ::= 62
|
|
-- Reserved for PKINIT
|
|
kdc-error-kdc-not-trusted ErrCode ::= 63
|
|
-- Reserved for PKINIT
|
|
kdc-error-invalid-sig ErrCode ::= 64
|
|
-- Reserved for PKINIT
|
|
kdc-err-key-too-weak ErrCode ::= 65
|
|
-- Reserved for PKINIT
|
|
kdc-err-certificate-mismatch ErrCode ::= 66
|
|
-- No TGT available to validate USER-TO-USER
|
|
krb-ap-err-no-tgt ErrCode ::= 67
|
|
-- USER-TO-USER TGT issued different KDC
|
|
kdc-err-wrong-realm ErrCode ::= 68
|
|
-- Ticket must be for USER-TO-USER
|
|
krb-ap-err-user-to-user-required ErrCode ::= 69
|
|
-- Reserved for PKINIT
|
|
kdc-err-cant-verify-certificate ErrCode ::= 70
|
|
-- Reserved for PKINIT
|
|
kdc-err-invalid-certificate ErrCode ::= 71
|
|
-- Reserved for PKINIT
|
|
kdc-err-revoked-certificate ErrCode ::= 72
|
|
-- Reserved for PKINIT
|
|
kdc-err-revocation-status-unknown ErrCode ::= 73
|
|
-- Reserved for PKINIT
|
|
kdc-err-revocation-status-unavailable ErrCode ::= 74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
END
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Kerberos and Character Encodings (Informative)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[adapted from KCLAR 5.2.1]
|
|
|
|
|
|
The original specification of the Kerberos protocol in RFC 1510 uses
|
|
GeneralString in numerous places for human-readable string data.
|
|
Historical implementations of Kerberos cannot utilize the full power
|
|
of GeneralString. This ASN.1 type requires the use of designation
|
|
and invocation escape sequences as specified in ISO 2022 | ECMA-35
|
|
[ISO2022] to switch character sets, and the default character set
|
|
that is designated as G0 is the ISO 646 | ECMA-6 [ISO646]
|
|
International Reference Version (IRV) (aka U.S. ASCII), which mostly
|
|
works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISO 2022 | ECMA-35 defines four character-set code elements (G0..G3)
|
|
and two Control-function code elements (C0..C1). DER previously
|
|
[X690-1997] prohibited the designation of character sets as any but
|
|
the G0 and C0 sets. This had the side effect of prohibiting the use
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 103]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
of (ISO Latin) character-sets such as ISO 8859-1 [ISO8859-1] or any
|
|
other character-sets that utilize a 96-character set, since it is
|
|
prohibited by ISO 2022 | ECMA-35 to designate them as the G0 code
|
|
element. Recent revisions to the ASN.1 standards resolve this
|
|
contradiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In practice, many implementations treat RFC 1510 GeneralStrings as if
|
|
they were 8-bit strings of whichever character set the implementation
|
|
defaults to, without regard for correct usage of character-set
|
|
designation escape sequences. The default character set is often
|
|
determined by the current user's operating system dependent locale.
|
|
At least one major implementation places unescaped UTF-8 encoded
|
|
Unicode characters in the GeneralString. This failure to conform to
|
|
the GeneralString specifications results in interoperability issues
|
|
when conflicting character encodings are utilized by the Kerberos
|
|
clients, services, and KDC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This unfortunate situation is the result of improper documentation of
|
|
the restrictions of the ASN.1 GeneralString type in prior Kerberos
|
|
specifications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[the following should probably be rewritten and moved into the
|
|
principal name section]
|
|
|
|
|
|
For compatibility, implementations MAY choose to accept GeneralString
|
|
values that contain characters other than those permitted by
|
|
IA5String, but they should be aware that character set designation
|
|
codes will likely be absent, and that the encoding should probably be
|
|
treated as locale-specific in almost every way. Implementations MAY
|
|
also choose to emit GeneralString values that are beyond those
|
|
permitted by IA5String, but should be aware that doing so is
|
|
extraordinarily risky from an interoperability perspective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some existing implementations use GeneralString to encode unescaped
|
|
locale-specific characters. This is a violation of the ASN.1
|
|
standard. Most of these implementations encode US-ASCII in the left-
|
|
hand half, so as long the implementation transmits only US-ASCII, the
|
|
ASN.1 standard is not violated in this regard. As soon as such an
|
|
implementation encodes unescaped locale-specific characters with the
|
|
high bit set, it violates the ASN.1 standard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other implementations have been known to use GeneralString to contain
|
|
a UTF-8 encoding. This also violates the ASN.1 standard, since UTF-8
|
|
is a different encoding, not a 94 or 96 character "G" set as defined
|
|
by ISO 2022. It is believed that these implementations do not even
|
|
use the ISO 2022 escape sequence to change the character encoding.
|
|
Even if implementations were to announce the change of encoding by
|
|
using that escape sequence, the ASN.1 standard prohibits the use of
|
|
any escape sequences other than those used to designate/invoke "G" or
|
|
"C" sets allowed by GeneralString.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 104]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Kerberos History (Informative)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Adapted from KCLAR "BACKGROUND"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Kerberos model is based in part on Needham and Schroeder's
|
|
trusted third-party authentication protocol [NS78] and on
|
|
modifications suggested by Denning and Sacco [DS81]. The original
|
|
design and implementation of Kerberos Versions 1 through 4 was the
|
|
work of two former Project Athena staff members, Steve Miller of
|
|
Digital Equipment Corporation and Clifford Neuman (now at the
|
|
Information Sciences Institute of the University of Southern
|
|
California), along with Jerome Saltzer, Technical Director of Project
|
|
Athena, and Jeffrey Schiller, MIT Campus Network Manager. Many other
|
|
members of Project Athena have also contributed to the work on
|
|
Kerberos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Version 5 of the Kerberos protocol (described in this document) has
|
|
evolved from Version 4 based on new requirements and desires for
|
|
features not available in Version 4. The design of Version 5 of the
|
|
Kerberos protocol was led by Clifford Neuman and John Kohl with much
|
|
input from the community. The development of the MIT reference
|
|
implementation was led at MIT by John Kohl and Theodore Ts'o, with
|
|
help and contributed code from many others. Since RFC1510 was
|
|
issued, extensions and revisions to the protocol have been proposed
|
|
by many individuals. Some of these proposals are reflected in this
|
|
document. Where such changes involved significant effort, the
|
|
document cites the contribution of the proposer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference implementations of both version 4 and version 5 of Kerberos
|
|
are publicly available and commercial implementations have been
|
|
developed and are widely used. Details on the differences between
|
|
Kerberos Versions 4 and 5 can be found in [KNT94].
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Notational Differences from [KCLAR]
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ possible point for discussion ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
[KCLAR] uses notational conventions slightly different from this
|
|
document. As a derivative of RFC 1510, the text of [KCLAR] uses C-
|
|
language style identifier names for defined values. In ASN.1
|
|
notation, identifiers referencing defined values must begin with a
|
|
lowercase letter and contain hyphen (-) characters rather than
|
|
underscore (_) characters, while identifiers referencing types begin
|
|
with an uppercase letter. [KCLAR] and RFC 1510 use all-uppercase
|
|
identifiers with underscores to identify defined values. This has
|
|
the potential to create confusion, but neither document defines
|
|
values using actual ASN.1 value-assignment notation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is debatable whether it is advantageous to write all identifier
|
|
names (regardless of their ASN.1 token type) in all-uppercase letters
|
|
for the purpose of emphasis in running text. The alternative is to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 105]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
use double-quote characters (") when ambiguity is possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normative References
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ISO646]
|
|
"7-bit coded character set", ISO/IEC 646:1991 | ECMA-6:1991.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ISO2022]
|
|
"Information technology -- Character code structure and
|
|
extension techniques", ISO/IEC 2022:1994 | ECMA-35:1994.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[KCRYPTO]
|
|
K. Raeburn, "Encryption and Checksum Specifications for Kerberos
|
|
5", draft-ietf-krb-wg-crypto-07.txt, work in progress.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[RFC2119]
|
|
S. Bradner, RFC2119: "Key words for use in RFC's to Indicate
|
|
Requirement Levels", March 1997.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[RFC3660]
|
|
H. Alvestrand, "Tags for the Identification of Languages",
|
|
RFC 3660, January 2001.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[SASLPREP]
|
|
Kurt D. Zeilenga, "SASLprep: Stringprep profile for user names
|
|
and passwords", draft-ietf-sasl-saslprep-10.txt, work in
|
|
progress.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[X680]
|
|
"Information technology -- Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1):
|
|
Specification of basic notation", ITU-T Recommendation X.680
|
|
(2002) | ISO/IEC 8824-1:2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[X682]
|
|
"Information technology -- Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1):
|
|
Constraint specification", ITU-T Recommendation X.682 (2002) |
|
|
ISO/IEC 8824-3:2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[X683]
|
|
"Information technology -- Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1):
|
|
Parameterization of ASN.1 specifications", ITU-T Recommendation
|
|
X.683 (2002) | ISO/IEC 8824-4:2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[X690]
|
|
"Information technology -- ASN.1 encoding Rules: Specification
|
|
of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding Rules (CER)
|
|
and Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)", ITU-T Recommendation
|
|
X.690 (2002) | ISO/IEC 8825-1:2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 106]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Informative References
|
|
|
|
|
|
[DS81]
|
|
Dorothy E. Denning and Giovanni Maria Sacco, "Time-stamps in Key
|
|
Distribution Protocols," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 24(8),
|
|
pp. 533-536 (August 1981).
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Dub00]
|
|
Olivier Dubuisson, "ASN.1 - Communication between Heterogeneous
|
|
Systems", Elsevier-Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.
|
|
<http://www.oss.com/asn1/dubuisson.html>
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ISO8859-1]
|
|
"Information technology -- 8-bit single-byte coded graphic
|
|
character sets -- Part 1: Latin alphabet No. 1", ISO/IEC 8859-
|
|
1:1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[KCLAR]
|
|
Clifford Neuman, Tom Yu, Sam Hartman, Ken Raeburn, "The Kerberos
|
|
Network Authentication Service (V5)", draft-ietf-krb-wg-
|
|
kerberos-clarifications-07.txt, work in progress.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[KNT94]
|
|
John T. Kohl, B. Clifford Neuman, and Theodore Y. Ts'o, "The
|
|
Evolution of the Kerberos Authentication System". In
|
|
Distributed Open Systems, pages 78-94. IEEE Computer Society
|
|
Press, 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Lar96]
|
|
John Larmouth, "Understanding OSI", International Thomson
|
|
Computer Press, 1996.
|
|
<http://www.isi.salford.ac.uk/books/osi.html>
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Lar99]
|
|
John Larmouth, "ASN.1 Complete", Elsevier-Morgan Kaufmann,
|
|
1999. <http://www.oss.com/asn1/larmouth.html>
|
|
|
|
|
|
[NS78]
|
|
Roger M. Needham and Michael D. Schroeder, "Using Encryption for
|
|
Authentication in Large Networks of Computers", Communications
|
|
of the ACM, Vol. 21(12), pp. 993-999 (December, 1978).
|
|
|
|
|
|
[RFC1510]
|
|
J. Kohl and B. C. Neuman, "The Kerberos Network Authentication
|
|
Service (v5)", RFC1510, September 1993, Status: Proposed
|
|
Standard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[RFC1964]
|
|
J. Linn, "The Kerberos Version 5 GSS-API Mechanism", RFC 1964,
|
|
June 1996, Status: Proposed Standard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 107]
|
|
Internet-Draft yu-krb-extensions-02 25 Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
[X690-2002]
|
|
"Information technology -- ASN.1 encoding rules: Specification
|
|
of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding Rules (CER)
|
|
and Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)", ITU-T Recommendation
|
|
X.690 (2002) | ISO/IEC 8825-1:2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author's Address
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Yu
|
|
77 Massachusetts Ave
|
|
Cambridge, MA 02139
|
|
USA
|
|
tlyu@mit.edu
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Copyright Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject
|
|
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
|
|
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
|
|
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
|
|
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
|
|
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
|
|
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
|
|
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
|
|
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yu Expires: Apr 2005 [Page 108] |