- Add --keepold/keepallold/pruneall options to various kadmin/ktutil
commands. Default behavior to "prune old keys".
- When setting keys for a service, we need to specify enctypes for it:
- Always use kadm5_randkey_principal_3() instead of the older
kadm5_randkey_principal().
- Add krb5_string_to_keysalts2(), like MIT's krb5_string_to_keysalts(),
but with a context, and simpler.
- Add --enctypes options to various kadmin/ktutil commands.
- Add [libdefaults] supported_enctypes param with enctype[:salttype]
list.
- Add [realms] realm supported_enctypes param with enctype[:salttype]
list.
Default to aes128-cts-hmac-sha1-96:normal.
This patch adds the "enforce_on_admin_set" configuration knob in the
[password_quality] section. When this is enabled, administrative password
changes via the kadmin or kpasswd protocols will be subject to password quality
checks. (An administrative password change is one where the authenticating
principal is different to the principal whose password is being changed.)
Note that kadmin running in local mode (-l) is unaffected by this patch.
From a suggestion by nicowilliams, put double quotes aroung the varaible
$foopassword in case the password contains whitespace or other special
characters.
When we use a custom patch that makes strong passwords required even for
administrators the check-kadmin test will fail because "foo" (the password
used in check-kadmin.in) is not a strong password. So, we make the
password used in check-kadmin.in settable as a parameter. This way, we
only have to change one line of check-kadmin.in rather than a dozen to get
check-kadmin to pass when using the strong-passwords everywhere patch.
Note that this change makes no real change to any of the tests in
check-kadmin.in: no tests are changed, removed, or added.
CVE-2016-2400
kadmind(8) was not checking for 'add' permission to aliases added via
kadm5_modify_principal(). This is a security vulnerability. The impact
of this vulnerability is mostly minor because most sites that use
kadmind(8) generally grant roughly the same level of permissions to all
administrators. However, the impact will be higher for sites that grant
modify privileges to large numbers of less-privileged users.
From what we know of existing deployments of Heimdal, it seems very
likely that the impact of this vulnerability will be minor for most
sites.
