doc: Fix Texinfo docs; remove krb4 references

This commit is contained in:
Nicolas Williams
2022-03-16 17:48:23 -05:00
parent dcef1341d3
commit 0878a568f9
9 changed files with 27 additions and 278 deletions

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
@c $Id$
@node Windows compatibility, Programming with Kerberos, Kerberos 4 issues, Top
@node Windows compatibility, Programming with Kerberos, Things in search for a better place, Top
@comment node-name, next, previous, up
@chapter Windows compatibility
@@ -126,8 +126,7 @@ You also need to add the inter-realm keys to the Heimdal KDC. But take
care to the encryption types and salting used for those keys. There should be
no encryption type stronger than the one configured on Windows side for this
relationship, itself limited to the ones supported by this specific version of
Windows, nor any Kerberos 4 salted hashes, as Windows does not seem to
understand them. Otherwise, the trust will not works.
Windows. Otherwise, the trust will not works.
Here are the version-specific needed information:
@enumerate
@@ -235,11 +234,11 @@ analysing the data.
@comment node-name, next, previous, up
@section Quirks of Windows 2000 KDC
There are some issues with salts and Windows 2000. Using an empty salt---which is the only one that Kerberos 4 supported, and is therefore known
as a Kerberos 4 compatible salt---does not work, as far as we can tell
from out experiments and users' reports. Therefore, you have to make
sure you keep around keys with all the different types of salts that are
required. Microsoft have fixed this issue post Windows 2003.
There are some issues with salts and Windows 2000. Using an empty salt does
not work, as far as we can tell from out experiments and users' reports.
Therefore, you have to make sure you keep around keys with all the different
types of salts that are required. Microsoft have fixed this issue post Windows
2003.
Microsoft seems also to have forgotten to implement the checksum
algorithms @samp{rsa-md4-des} and @samp{rsa-md5-des}. This can make Name