Merge tag 'v0.21.23'
release v0.21.23
This commit is contained in:
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#include "PollGroupWinSelect.hxx"
|
||||
|
||||
constexpr int EVENT_READ = 0;
|
||||
constexpr int EVENT_WRITE = 1;
|
||||
static constexpr int EVENT_READ = 0;
|
||||
static constexpr int EVENT_WRITE = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
static constexpr
|
||||
bool HasEvent(unsigned events, int event_id) noexcept
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -23,6 +23,10 @@
|
||||
#include <cassert>
|
||||
#include <utility>
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef USE_EPOLL
|
||||
#include <cerrno>
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
SocketMonitor::Dispatch(unsigned flags) noexcept
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -81,6 +85,21 @@ SocketMonitor::Schedule(unsigned flags) noexcept
|
||||
|
||||
if (success)
|
||||
scheduled_flags = flags;
|
||||
#ifdef USE_EPOLL
|
||||
else if (errno == EBADF || errno == ENOENT)
|
||||
/* the socket was probably closed by somebody else
|
||||
(EBADF) or a new file descriptor with the same
|
||||
number was created but not registered already
|
||||
(ENOENT) - we can assume that there are no
|
||||
scheduled events */
|
||||
/* note that when this happens, we're actually lucky
|
||||
that it has failed - imagine another thread may
|
||||
meanwhile have created something on the same file
|
||||
descriptor number, and has registered it; the
|
||||
epoll_ctl() call above would then have succeeded,
|
||||
but broke the other thread's epoll registration */
|
||||
scheduled_flags = 0;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
return success;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ public:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ScheduleRead() noexcept {
|
||||
return Schedule(GetScheduledFlags() | READ | HANGUP | ERROR);
|
||||
return Schedule(GetScheduledFlags() | READ);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ScheduleWrite() noexcept {
|
||||
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ public:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void CancelRead() noexcept {
|
||||
Schedule(GetScheduledFlags() & ~(READ|HANGUP|ERROR));
|
||||
Schedule(GetScheduledFlags() & ~READ);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void CancelWrite() noexcept {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user