Fix SparesMissing warning for microbel #151

Open
opened 2024-08-30 13:30:34 +02:00 by oysteikt · 2 comments
Owner

Should we add a spare? Microbel is somewhat critical...

email sample
This is an automatically generated mail message from mdadm
running on microbel

A SparesMissing event had been detected on md device /dev/md/2.

Faithfully yours, etc.

P.S. The /proc/mdstat file currently contains the following:

Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid10]
md2 : active raid1 sdd4[0] sdb4[3] sda4[2] sde4[6] sdf4[5]
      46873896 blocks super 1.2 [5/5] [UUUUU]
     
md1 : active raid5 sdd3[0] sda3[2] sdb3[3] sde3[4] sdf3[5]
      7624599552 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [UUUUU]
     
md0 : active raid1 sdd2[0] sdb2[3] sda2[2] sde2[4] sdf2[5]
      478503 blocks super 1.2 [5/5] [UUUUU]
     
unused devices: <none>
Should we add a spare? Microbel is somewhat critical... <details> <summary>email sample</summary> ``` This is an automatically generated mail message from mdadm running on microbel A SparesMissing event had been detected on md device /dev/md/2. Faithfully yours, etc. P.S. The /proc/mdstat file currently contains the following: Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid10] md2 : active raid1 sdd4[0] sdb4[3] sda4[2] sde4[6] sdf4[5] 46873896 blocks super 1.2 [5/5] [UUUUU] md1 : active raid5 sdd3[0] sda3[2] sdb3[3] sde3[4] sdf3[5] 7624599552 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [UUUUU] md0 : active raid1 sdd2[0] sdb2[3] sda2[2] sde2[4] sdf2[5] 478503 blocks super 1.2 [5/5] [UUUUU] unused devices: <none> ``` </details>
oysteikt added the
servers n' hardware
crash report
bug
labels 2024-08-30 13:30:34 +02:00
oysteikt added this to the Kanban project 2024-08-30 13:30:34 +02:00
Owner

Is the solution here to A) Add a spare drive or B) Stop it from sending emails?

I think we should go for B, but with a very specific and careful thought to stop this warning in particular, we really really need to get emails from md when a live drive actually fails.

Is the solution here to A) Add a spare drive or B) Stop it from sending emails? I think we should go for B, but with a very specific and careful thought to stop _this warning in particular_, we really really need to get emails from md when a live drive actually fails.
Owner

i believe microbel used to have a spare

i believe microbel used to have a spare
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.